Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Appropriateness of selection criteria for CT examinations performed at an emergency department

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Emergency Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the diagnosis of traumatic and nontraumatic emergencies, computed tomography (CT) is the most frequently performed procedure. The aims of this study were to find out whether CT report results can be used as a reliable tool for the diagnosis and management of patients at an emergency department and to evaluate the appropriateness of the selection criteria for CT examinations. For this reason, we analysed the emergency CT procedures according to the diagnostic hypothesis written on CT request forms, the results of the CT reports and the final diagnosis of the patients. One thousand consecutive CT procedures in the emergency department of a research hospital were retrospectively analysed. When the CT reports and the final diagnosis were evaluated, the sensitivity and specifity of the CT were found to be 0.81 and 0.85. According to the analysis of the CT reports, 55.8 % of all the patients were reported to be normal. When the patient files were examined for the final diagnosis of the patients, 55.7 % of the patients did not receive a final diagnosis related to the diagnostic hypothesis. The lowest correlation was found between the diagnostic hypothesis, the CT reports and the final diagnosis of the patients who underwent cranial CT procedure for trauma. The results of the CT reports can be used as a reliable parameter for the diagnosis and management of the patients at emergency departments. On the other hand, a high negative rate of CT reports was noted especially for the cranial CT examinations. CT selection criteria for the head trauma patients should be reconsidered. Since CT is a procedure involving ionising radiation, it is important that it is performed with the correct indications and the relevant clinical information is specified on the CT request forms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Harris JH Jr (2002) Reflections: emergency radiology. Radiology 218:309–316

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Hauser H, Bohndorf K (1998) Radiologic emergency management in multiple trauma cases. Radiologe 38:637–644

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Prokop M (2003) General principles of MDCT. Eur J Radiol 45:4–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Philipp MO, Kubin K, Mang T, Hormann M, Metz VM (2003) Three-dimensional volume rendering of multidector-row CT data: applicable for emergency radiology. Eur J Radiol 48:33–38

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kligenbeck-Regn K, Schaller S, Flohr T, Ohnesorge B, Kopp AF, Baum U (1999) Subsecond multi-slice computed tomography: basics and applications. Eur J Radiol 31:110–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Lee EY, Siegel MJ, Hildebolt CF, Gutierrez FR, Bhalla S, Fallah JH (2004) MDCT evaluation of thoracic aortic anomalies in pediatric patients and young adults: comparison of axial, multiplanar, and 3D images. AJR 182:777–784

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Mahesh M (2002) Search for isotropic resolution in CT from conventional through multiple-row detector. RadioGraphics 22:949–962

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kelly DM, Hasegawa I, Borders R, Hatabu H, Boiselle PM (2004) High-resolution CT using MDCT: comparison of degree of motion artifact between volumetric and axial methods. AJR 182:757–759

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Philipp MO, Kubin K, Hormann M, Metz VM (2003) Radiological emergency room management with emphasis on multidector row CT. Eur J Radiol 48:2–4

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Leidner B, Adiels M, Aspelin P, Gullstrand P, Wallen S (1998) Standardized CT examination of the multitraumatized patient. Eur Radiol 8:1630–1638

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Novelline RA, Rhea JT, Rao PM, Stuk JL (1999) Helical CT in emergency radiology. Radiology 213:321–339

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Nunez DB Jr, Ledbetter MS, Farrell L (2002) Dedicated CT scanner in an emergency department: quantification of factors that contribute to lack of use. AJR 179:859–862

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. National Institute for Clinical Excellence (2002) Head injury in infants, children and adults: triage, assessment, investigation and early management (Nice guideline). December 2002 Second Consultation Draft, London

    Google Scholar 

  14. Stiell IG, Wells GA, Vandemheen K et al (2001) The Canadian CT head rule for patients with minor head injury. Lancet 357:1391–1396

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kay A, Teasdle G (2001) Head injury in the United Kingdom. World J Surg 25:1210–1220

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Society of British Neuroradiological Surgeons (2000) Safe neurosurgery. A report from the society of British neuroradiological surgeons. In: Nelson MJ (ed) SBNS. Lincoln’s Fields, London, pp 35–43

    Google Scholar 

  17. Harris A, Williams D, Jain N, Lockey A (2006) Management of minor head injuries according to NICE guidelines and changes in the number of patients requiring computerised tomography imaging in a district general hospital: a retrospective study. Int J Clin Pract 60:1120–1122

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Macgregor DM, Mckie L (2005) CT or not CT-that is the question. Whether it’s better to evaluate clinically and x ray than to undertake a CT head scan. Emerg Med J 22:541–543

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Novak EM, Terabe F, Nasimoto AL et al (2001) Correlation between diagnostic hypothesis and result of cranial computed axial tomography. Arq Neuropsiquiatr 59:761–767

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Teunen D (1998) The European directive on health protection of individuals against the dangers of ionising radiation in relation to medical exposures (97/43/EURATOM). J Radiol Prot 18:133–137

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Walker A, Tuck JS (2001) The ionising radiation (medical exposure) regulations: impact on clinical radiology. Br J Radiol 74:571–574

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Zacharia TT, Kanekar SG, Nguyen DT, Moser K (2011) Optimization of patient dose and image quality with z-axis dose modulation for computed tomography (CT) head in acute head trauma and stroke. Emerg Radiol 18:103–107

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Ardley ND, Lau KK, Buchan K (2013) Radiation dose reduction using a neck detection algorithm for single spiral brain and cervical spine CT acquisition in the trauma setting. Emerg Radiol 20:493–497

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Sierink JC, Saltzherr TP, Wirtz MR, Streekstra GJ, Beenen LF, Goslings JC (2013) Radiation exposure before and after the introduction of a dedicated total-body CT protocol in multitrauma patients. Emerg Radiol 20:507–512

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Radiology, Diskapi Yildirim Beyazit Training and Research Hospital, 06110, Diskapi-Altındag/Ankara, Turkey

    Idil Gunes Tatar, Hasan Aydin, Volkan Kizilgoz & Baki Hekimoglu

  2. Department of General Surgery, Diskapi Yildirim Beyazit Training and Research Hospital, 06110, Diskapi-Altındag/Ankara, Turkey

    Kerim Bora Yilmaz

Authors
  1. Idil Gunes Tatar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Hasan Aydin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Volkan Kizilgoz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Kerim Bora Yilmaz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Baki Hekimoglu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Idil Gunes Tatar.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gunes Tatar, I., Aydin, H., Kizilgoz, V. et al. Appropriateness of selection criteria for CT examinations performed at an emergency department. Emerg Radiol 21, 583–588 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10140-014-1234-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10140-014-1234-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation