Abstract
Bellocchi, Ritchie, Tobin, Sandhu and Sandhu’s (2013) study highlights the crucial role that emotions play in learning at the university level in a preservice secondary science teacher education class. They examine the classroom structures that tended to lead to both a positive valence and a high level of intensity of the emotional climate (EC). This article explores the implications of their study for better understanding how to foster a positive classroom emotional climate for elementary level preservice teachers, given the specifics of elementary school environments. Drawing on theories of interactional solidarity. I explore the implications of EC for increasing pre-service teachers’ capacity to avoid order-giving rituals and to create science-centered communities in their classrooms. I also suggest possible areas for future research, such as the role of expectations in EC, the different EC outcomes of lectures, EC and the development of confidence in science, and the ways in which teacher candidates are positioned within interaction rituals in elementary science methods classes.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aikenhead, G. S. (1996). Science education: Border crossing into the subculture of science. Studies in Science Education, 27, 1–52.
Barton, A. C., & Yang, K. (2000). The culture of power and science education: Learning from Miguel. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37, 871–889.
Bellocchi, A., Ritchie, S., Tobin, K., Sandhu, M., & Sandhu, S. (2013). Exploring emotional climate in preservice science teacher education. Cultural Studies of Science Education.
Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. G. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241–258). NY: Greenwood Press.
Calabrese Barton, A., Tan, E., & Rivet, A. (2008). Creating hybrid spaces for engaging school science among urban middle school girls. American Educational Research Journal, 45(1), 68–103.
Collins, R. (2004). Interaction ritual chains. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Eshach, H. (2003). Inquiry-events as a tool for changing science teaching efficacy belief of kindergarten and elementary school teachers. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 12(4), 495–501.
Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. New York: Anchor Books.
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Lemke, J. L. (1990). Talking science: Language, learning and values. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Company.
Olitsky, S. (2007a). Facilitating identity formation, group membership, and learning in science classrooms: What can be learned from out of field teaching in an urban school? Science Education, 91(2), 201–221.
Olitsky, S. (2007b). Identity, interaction ritual, and students’ strategic use of science language. In W.-M. Roth & K. Tobin (Eds.), Science, learning, identity: Sociocultural and cultural-historical perspectives (pp. 41–62). Rotterdam, Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
Olitsky, S. (2007c). Promoting student engagement in science: Interaction rituals and the pursuit of a community of practice. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(1), 33–56.
Zeichner, K. (1999). The new scholarship in teacher education. Educational Researcher, 28(9), 4–15.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Lead Editor: A. Tan.
This is a forum review of A. Bellocchi, S. Ritchie, K. Tobin, M. Sandhu & S. Sandhu (2013) “Exploring emotional climate in preservice science teacher education” doi:10.1007/s11422-013-9526-3.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Olitsky, S. We teach as we are taught: exploring the potential for emotional climate to enhance elementary science preservice teacher education. Cult Stud of Sci Educ 8, 561–570 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-013-9530-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-013-9530-7