Skip to main content
Log in

Asymmetrical intraspecific competition in Echinochloa crus-galli is related to differences in the timing of seedling emergence and seedling vigour

  • Published:
Plant Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Individual size is an important factor that determines fitness in annual plants. Variation in size originates at the seedling stage based on differences in seedling vigour and time of emergence, ensuing asymmetrical intraspecific competition between early- and late-established plants. The effects of the order of seedling emergence on characteristics of barnyard grass (Echinochloa crus-galli) were studied. In the first experiment, competition between pairs of plants, one of which was sown and emerged 0, 3, 6 or 12 days earlier than the other, was determined. In the second experiment, competition between two plants that were sown at the same time, but emerged at different times because of variation in seed quality, was determined. Competition decreased plant mass, tillering, height and the number of caryopses per panicle, but not time to earing or root/shoot ratio. Plants that were sown 3 days after the first plants in competing pairs grew to 32% of the size of solitary control plants, with the effect of competition accounting for 40% and asymmetrical competition 28% of the total reduction in size. When a 3-day lag in germination was determined intrinsically, plant size was reduced to 19% of the control, with the effect of competition accounting for 34%, asymmetrical competition 15% and poor intrinsic quality of the plant 32% of the total reduction in size. Small environmentally induced delays and more importantly, intrinsically induced delays in the time of emergence result in a considerable decrease in final plant size and fitness.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anten NPR, Hirose T (1998) Biomass allocation and light partitioning among dominant and subordinate individuals in Xanthium canadense stands. Ann Bot 82:665–673

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baskin CC, Baskin JM (1998) Seeds: ecology, biogeography, and evolution of dormancy and germination. Academic Press, San Diego

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger U, Piou C, Schiffers K, Grimm V (2008) Competition among plants: concepts, individual based modelling approaches, and a proposal for a future research strategy. Persp Plant Ecol Evol Syst 9:121–135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bretagnolle F, Thompson JD, Lumaret R (1995) The influence of seed size variation on seed germination and seedling vigor in diploid and tetraploid Dactylis glomerata L. Ann Bot 76:607–615

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Casper BB, Jackson RB (1997) Plant competition underground. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 28:545–570

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castro J (1999) Seed mass versus seedling performance in scots pine: a maternally dependent trait. New Phytol 144:153–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Damgaard C (2004) Modelling individual plant growth at a variable mean density or at a specific spatial setting. CR Biol 327:255–260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Damgaard C, Weiner J (2008) Modelling the growth of individuals in crowded plant populations. J Plant Ecol 1:111–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Damgaard C, Weiner J, Nagashima H (2002) Modelling individual growth and competition in plant populations: growth curves of Chenopodium album at two densities. J Ecol 90:666–671

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giles BE (1990) The effects of variation in seed size on growth and reproduction in the wild barley Hordeum vulgare ssp. spontaneum. Heredity 64:239–250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gross KL, Smith AD (1991) Seed mass and emergence time effects on performance of Panicum dichotomiflorum Michx. across environments. Oecologia 87:270–278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harper JL (1977) Population biology of plants. Academic Press, London, New York, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Hendrix SD, Trapp EJ (1992) Population demography of Pastinaca sativa (Apiaceae): effects of seed mass on emergence, survival, and recruitment. Am J Bot 79:365–375

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Honek A, Martinkova Z (1991) Competition between maize and barnyard grass Echinochloa crus-galli, and its effect on aphids and their predators. Acta Oecol Oecol Appl 12:741–751

    Google Scholar 

  • Houssard C, Escarre J (1991) The effects of seed weight on growth and competitive ability of Rumex acetosella from two successional old-fields. Oecologia 86:236–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kohyama T, Takada T (2009) The stratification theory for plant coexistence promoted by one sided competition. J Ecol 97:463–471

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu J, Wang GX, Wei L, Wang CM (2008) Reproductive allocation patterns in different density populations of spring wheat. J Integr Plant Biol 50:141–146

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mangla S, Sheley RL, James JJ, Radosevich SR (2011) Intra and interspecific competition among invasive and native species during early stages of plant growth. Plant Ecol 212:531–542

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martinkova Z, Honek A (1992) Effect of plant size on the number of caryopses in barnyard grass, Echinochloa crus-galli (Poaceae). Preslia 64:171–176

    Google Scholar 

  • Martinkova Z, Honek A (1993) The effects of sowing depth and date on emergence and growth of barnyard grass, Echinochloa crus-galli. Ochrana Rostlin 29:251–257

    Google Scholar 

  • Martinkova Z, Honek A (1998) Competition between maize and barnyard grass (Echinochloa crus-galli) at different moisture regime. Rostlinna Vyroba 44:65–69

    Google Scholar 

  • Nord-Larsen T, Damgaard C, Weiner J (2006) Quantifying size-asymmetric growth among individual beech trees. Can J Forest Res 36:418–425

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norris RF, Elmore C, Rejmanek M, Akey WC (2001) Spatial arrangement, density, and competition between barnyardgrass and tomato: II Barnyardgrass growth and seed production. Weed Sci 49:69–76

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pierik R, Voesenek LACJ, de Kroon H, Visser EJV (2004) Density-induced plant size reduction and size inequalities in ethylene-sensing and ethylene-insensitive tobacco. Plant Biol 6:201–205

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rees M, Brown VA (1991) The effect of established plants on recruitment in the annual forb Sinapis arvensis. Oecologia 87:58–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds HL, Rajaniemi TK (2007) Plant interactions: competition. In: Pugnaire FI, Valladares F (eds) Functional plant ecology. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 457–480

    Google Scholar 

  • Rossini MA, Maddonni GA, Otegui ME (2011) Inter-plant competition for resources in maize crops grown under contrasting nitrogen supply and density: variability in plant and ear growth. Field Crop Res 121:373–380

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salonen V, Suhonen J (1995) Effects of seed weight on growth, reproduction and competitive ability of Linum usitatissimum seedlings. Ann Bot Fenn 32:101–106

    Google Scholar 

  • Susko DJ, Cavers PB (2008) Seed size effects and competitive ability in Thlaspi arvense L. (Brassicaceae). Botany 86:259–267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Susko DJ, Lovett Doust J (2000) Patterns of seed mass variation and their effects on seedling traits in Alliaria petiolata (Brassicaceae). Am J Bot 87:56–66

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vange V, Heuch I, Vandvik V (2004) Do seed mass and family affect germination and juvenile performance in Knautia arvensis? A study using failure-time method. Acta Oecol 25:169–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • von Wettberg EJ, Weiner J (2003) Larger Triticum aestivum plants do not preempt nutrient-rich patches in a glasshouse experiment. Plant Ecol 169:85–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weiner J (1986) How competition for light and nutrients affects size variability in Ipomea tricolor populations. Ecology 67:1425–1427

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weiner J, Thomas SC (1986) Size variability and competition in plant monocultures. Oikos 47:211–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yuan ZY, Li LH, Han XG, Jiang FH, Zhao MX, Lin GH (2004) Effects of plant size on the nitrogen use strategy in an annual herb, Helianthus annuus (Sunflower). Acta Bot Sinica 46:889–895

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Professor A.F.G. Dixon and American Journal Experts Company for reading and making helpful suggestions for the manuscript and improving the English. The study was supported under Grant no. 002700604 by the Ministry of Agriculture of the Czech Republic.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alois Honek.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Martinkova, Z., Honek, A. Asymmetrical intraspecific competition in Echinochloa crus-galli is related to differences in the timing of seedling emergence and seedling vigour. Plant Ecol 212, 1831–1839 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11258-011-9953-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11258-011-9953-8

Keywords

Navigation