Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Intra and interspecific competition among invasive and native species during early stages of plant growth

  • Published:
Plant Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Plant competition is a primary ecological process limiting grassland restoration success. Appropriate restoration techniques require an understanding of the degree to which intra and interspecific competition control invasive and native plant growth. The objective of this study was to determine how the intensity of intra and interspecific competition changes during early stages of plant growth. Two invasive (Bromus tectorum and Taeniatherum caput-medusae) and two native (Pseudoroegneria spicata and Poa secunda) species were grown in a diallel competition experiment, either alone or in 1:1 binary combinations and exposed to two levels of N (no N or 400 mg N kg−1 soil added) in a greenhouse. Total biomass for each species was quantified over four harvests and competitive effects were calculated. Our results show that the relative magnitude of intra and interspecific competition changes through time. Intraspecific competition was intense for native species at the initial harvests and therefore important in contributing to the outcome of final size of native species seedlings. Interestingly, bluebunch wheatgrass imposed interspecific competition on annual grasses at the first two harvests and appeared to be a better competitor than Sandberg’s bluegrass. We found that fast growing invasive species became more competitive compared to slow growing native species with increasing N and appear to establish a positive feedback mechanism between size and resource uptake. Opportunities to improve restoration success exist from determining the optimum combination of density, species proportion, and their spatial arrangement in various ecosystems and environments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aarssen LW (1983) Ecological combining ability and competitive combining ability in plants: toward a general evolutionary theory of coexistence in systems of competition. Am Nat 122:707–731

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allen EB (1995) Restoration ecology: limits and possibilities in arid and semiarid lands. In: Roundy BA, MacArthur ED, Durant E, Haley JS, Mann DK (Compilers) Proceedings—wildland shrub and arid land restoration symposium. USDA general technical report INT-GTR-315, Ogden, pp 7–15

  • Berendse F, Aerts R (1987) Nitrogen-use-efficiency: a biological meaningful definition? Funct Ecol 1:293–296

    Google Scholar 

  • Bilbrough CJ, Caldwell MM (1997) Exploitation of springtime ephemeral N pulses by six great basin plant species. Ecology 78:231–243

    Google Scholar 

  • Blank RR (2010) Intraspecific and interspecific pair-wise seedling competition between exotic annual grasses and native perennials: plant–soil relationship. Plant Soil 326:331–343

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brown CS, Anderson VJ, Claassen VP et al (2008) Restoration ecology and invasive plants in the semiarid west. Invasive Plant Sci Manag 1:399–413

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cameron T, Wearing H, Rohani P, Sait S (2007) Two-species asymmetric competition: effects of age structure on intra- and interspecific interactions. J Anim Ecol 76:83–93

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Casper B, Jackson R (1997) Plant competition underground. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 28:254–270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chambers JC, Meyer SE, Whittaker A, Roundy BA, Blank RR (2007) What makes Great Basin sagebrush ecosystems invasible by Bromus tectorum? Ecol Monogr 77:117–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christensen DL, Herwig BR, Schindler DE, Carpenter SR (1996) Impacts of lakeshore residential development on coarse woody debris in north temperate lakes. Ecol Appl 6:665–691

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collier MD, Fotelli MN, Nahm M et al (2003) Regulation of nitrogen uptake by Fagus sylvatica on a whole plant level-interactions between cytokinins and soluble N compounds. Plant Cell Environ 26:1549–1560

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Connell JH (1983) On the prevalence and relative importance of interspecific competition—evidence from field experiments. Am Nat 122:661–696

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Connolly J, Wayne P, Murray R (1990) Time course of plant–plant interactions in experimental mixtures of annuals—density, frequency, and nutrient effects. Oecologia 82:513–526

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crawley MJ (1997) Preface to the first edition. In: Crawley MJ (ed) Plant ecology. Blackwell Science Ltd, London

    Google Scholar 

  • D’Antonio CM, Vitousek PM (1992) Biological invasions by exotic grasses, the grass/fire cycles, and global change. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 23:63–87

    Google Scholar 

  • Daehler CC (2003) Performance comparisons of co-occurring native and alien invasive plants: implications for conservation and restoration. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 34:183–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duncan CA, Jachetta JJ, Brown ML et al (2004) Assessing the economic, environmental, and societal losses from invasive plants on rangeland and wildlands. Weed Technol 18:1411–1416

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farrer EC, Goldberg DE, King AA (2010) Time lags and the balance of positive and negative interactions in driving grassland community dynamics. Am Nat 175:160–173

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Foster BL (1999) Establishment, competition and the distribution of native grasses among Michigan old-fields. J Ecol 87:476–489

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foster BL, Gross KL (1997) Partitioning the effects of plant biomass and litter on Andropogon gerardi in old-field vegetation. Ecology 78:2091–2104

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster BL, Gross KL (1998) Species richness in a successional grassland: effects of nitrogen enrichment and plant litter. Ecology 79:2593–2602

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fowler N (1986) The role of competition in plant communities in arid and semiarid regions. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 17:89–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Germino MJ, Seefeldt SS, Hill J, Weber KT (2004) Ecological syndromes of invasion in semiarid rangelands and their implications for land management and restoration. In: Proceedings of the society for ecological restoration. 16th international conference for ecological restoration, August 24–26, 2004, Victoria, Canada, CDROM

  • Gibson DJ, Connolly J, Hartnett DC, Weidenhamer JD (1999) Designs for greenhouse studies of interactions between plants. J Ecol 87:1–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg DE (1987) Neighborhood competition in an old field plant community. Ecology 66:1211–1223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg DE, Barton AM (1992) Patterns and consequences of interspecific competition in natural communities: a review of field experiments with plants. Am Nat 139:771–801

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg DE, Rajaniemi T, Gurevitch J, Stewart-Oaten A (1999) Empirical approaches to quantifying interaction intensity: competition and facilitation along productivity gradients. Ecology 80:1118–1131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg DE, Turkington R, Olsvig-Whittaker L, Dyer AR (2001) Density dependence in an annual plant community: variation among life history stages. Ecol Monogr 71:423–446

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grime JP (1977) Evidence for existence of three primary strategies in plants and its relevance to ecological and evolutionary theory. Am Nat 111:1169–1194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grime JP (1979) Plant strategies and vegetation processes. Wiley, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  • Gurevitch J, Morrow LL, Wallace A, Walsh JS (1992) A meta-analysis of field experiments on competition. Am Nat 140:539–572

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harper JL (1977) Population biology of plants. Academic Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Hedges LV, Gurevitch J, Curtis PS (1999) The meta-analysis of response ratios in experimental ecology. Ecology 80:1150–1156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herron GJ, Sheley RL, Maxwell BD, Jacobsen JS (2001) Influence of nutrient availability on the interaction between spotted knapweed and bluebunch wheatgrass. Restor Ecol 9:326–332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howard TG, Goldberg DE (2001) Competitive response hierarchies for germination, growth, and survival and their influence on abundance. Ecology 82:979–990

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs JS, Sheley RL, Maxwell BD (1996) Effect of Sclerotinia sclerotiorum on the interference between bluebunch wheatgrass (Agropyron spicatum) and spotted knapweed (Centaurea maculosa). Weed Technol 10:13–21

    Google Scholar 

  • James JJ, Davies KW, Sheley RL, Aanderud ZT (2008) Linking nitrogen partitioning and species abundance to invasion resistance in the great basin. Oecologia 156:637–648

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lambers H, Poorter H (1992) Inherent variation in plant growth. Physiological mechanisms and ecological consequences. Adv Ecol Res 23:187–261

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lowe PN, Lauenroth WK, Burke IC (2003) Effects of nitrogen availability on competition between Bromus tectorum and Bouteloua gracilis. Plant Ecol 167:247–254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luken JO (1997) Management of plant invasions: implicating ecological succession. In: Luken JO, Thieret JW (eds) Assessment and management of plant invasions. Springer, New York, pp 133–144

    Google Scholar 

  • Mack RN (1989) Temperate grasslands vulnerable to plant invasions: characteristics and consequences. In: Drake JA, Mooney HA (eds) Biological invasions: a global perspective. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Mangold JM, Sheley RL, Svejcar TJ (2006) Toward ecologically-based invasive plant management on rangeland. Weed Sci 54:597–605

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mckane RB, Johnson LC, Shaver GR et al (2002) Resource-based niches provide a basis for plant species diversity and dominance in arctic tundra. Nature 415:68–71

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McLendon T, Redente EF (1992) Effects of nitrogen limitation on species replacement dynamics during early secondary succession on a semiarid sagebrush site. Oecologia 91:312–317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Novoplansky A, Goldberg D (2001) Effects of water pulsing on individual performance and competitive hierarchies in plants. J Veg Sci 12:199–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pimentel D, Lach L, Zuniga R, Morrison D (2005) Update on the environmental and economic costs associated with alien-invasive species in the United States. Ecol Econ 52:273–288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Radosevich SR (1987) Methods to study interactions among crops and weeds. Weed Technol 1:190–198

    Google Scholar 

  • Radosevich SR, Holt JS, Ghersa CM (2007) Weed ecology: implications for management, 3rd edn. Wiley, New York, pp 206–207

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoener TW (1983) Field experiments on interspecific competition. Am Nat 122:240–285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seabloom EW, Borer ET, Boucher VL et al (2003) Competition, seed limitation, disturbance, and reestablishment of California native annual forbs. Ecol Appl 13:573–592

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheley RL, Larson LL (1994) Comparative growth and interference between cheatgrass and yellow starthistle seedlings. J Range Manag 47:470–474

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheley RL, Mangold JM (2003) Principles for restoring invasive plant-infested rangeland. Weed Sci 51:260–265

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Simberloff D (2005) Non-native species do threaten the natural environment. J Agric Environ Ethics 18:595–607

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spitters CJT (1983) An alternative approach to the analysis of mixed cropping experiments. 1. Estimation of competition effects. Neth J Agric Sci 31:1–11

    Google Scholar 

  • S-Plus (2005) Version 7.0. Mathsoft, Inc., Seattle

  • Suding KN, Goldberg DE (1999) Variation in the effects of vegetation and litter on recruitment across productivity gradients. J Ecol 87:436–449

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tilman D (1982) Resource competition and community structure. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilman D (1988) Plant strategies and the dynamics and structure of plant communities. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner RB, Poulton CE, Gould WL (1963) Medusahead—a threat to Oregon rangeland. Oregon State University, Agricultural Experiment Station, special report 149

  • Vasquez E, Sheley RL, Svejcar TJ (2008) Creating invasion resistant soils via nitrogen management. Invasive Plant Sci Manag 1:304–314

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Velagala RP, Sheley RL, Jacobs JS (1997) Influence of density on intermediate wheatgrass and spotted knapweed interference. J Range Manag 50:523–529

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vitousek PM, D’Antonio CM, Loope LL, Westbrooks R (1996) Biological invasions as global environmental change. Am Sci 84:179–468

    Google Scholar 

  • Wassmuth BE, Stoll P, Tscharntke T, Thies C (2009) Spatial aggregation facilitates coexistence and diversity of wild plant species in field margins. Perspect Plant Ecol Evol Syst 11:127–135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wedin DA, Tilman D (1990) Species effects on nitrogen cycling: a test with perennial grasses. Oecologia 84:433–441

    Google Scholar 

  • Weigelt A, Jolliffe P (2003) Indices of plant competition. J Ecol 91:707–720

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson SD, Gerry AK (1995) Strategies for mixed-grass prairie restoration: herbicide, tilling, and nitrogen manipulation. Restor Ecol 3:290–298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young K, Mangold JM (2008) Medusahead (Taeniatherum caput-medusae) outperforms squirrel tail (Elymus elymoides) through interference and growth rate. Invasive Plant Sci Manag 1:73–81

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zlatnik E (1999) Pseudoroegneria spicata. In: Fire effects information system. U.S. Dep.Agric. For. Serv., Rocky Mtn. Res. Stn, Fire Sci. Laboratory. http://fs.fed.us/database/feis/. Accessed 20 February 2010

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank Jane Mangold for taking time to review the earlier draft of this manuscript, Brett Bingham and field technicians for assistance in project implementation and data collection. This project was funded by the USDA-Agricultural Research Service as a portion of the area-wide EBIPM of annual grasses project.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Seema Mangla

    Present address: Department of Environmental Science, Policy & Management, University of California Berkeley, 137 Mulford Hall #3114, Berkeley, CA, 94720, USA

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Environmental Science, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, 97331, USA

    Seema Mangla

  2. USDA-Agricultural Research Service, Eastern Oregon Agricultural Research Center, 67826-A Hwy 205, Burns, OR, 97720, USA

    Roger L. Sheley & Jeremy J. James

  3. Forest Ecosystems and Society, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, 97331, USA

    Steven R. Radosevich

Authors
  1. Seema Mangla
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Roger L. Sheley
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jeremy J. James
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Steven R. Radosevich
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Seema Mangla.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mangla, S., Sheley, R.L., James, J.J. et al. Intra and interspecific competition among invasive and native species during early stages of plant growth. Plant Ecol 212, 531–542 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11258-011-9909-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11258-011-9909-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation