Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Safety and efficacy of fondaparinux as an adjunctive treatment to thrombolysis in patients with high and intermediate risk pulmonary embolism

  • Published:
Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

No data are available on the efficacy and safety of a combination of fondaparinux and thrombolysis in the setting of high to intermediate risk pulmonary embolism (PE). Patients submitted to thrombolysis and fondaparinux, presenting with ≥1 of the following criteria were included: (1) cardiogenic shock, (2) syncope, (3) ≥1 proximal thrombo-embolus at CT scan, (4) positive troponin test, (5) echocardiographic findings indicating right ventricular (RV) dysfunction. In-hospital results included death, recurrent PE, persistent RV dysfunction at 48 h echocardiography, bleeding complications. Twenty seven patients were included; 22 received a 2 h infusion of rt-PA and 5 received a 2 h infusion of streptokinase. Ten patients presented with cardiogenic shock (37%), 8 with syncope (30%), all had RV dysfunction. 82% of patients had an uneventful in-hospital course. One patient died during hospital stay from refractory shock. Thrombolysis failed in 2 patients (7%), requiring successful rescue surgical embolectomy. Bleeding events occurred in 2 patients (7%), of whom 1 required blood transfusion. Despite the small sample size, our data suggest that fondaparinux procures adequate tolerability compared to standard current therapy in combination with thrombolysis in high to intermediate risk PE.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Buller HR, Davidson BL, Decousus H et al (2004) Fondaparinux or enoxaparin for the initial treatment of symptomatic deep venous thrombosis: a randomized trial. Ann Intern Med 140:867–873

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Buller HR, Davidson BL, Decousus H et al (2003) Subcutaneous fondaparinux versus intravenous unfractionated heparin in the initial treatment of pulmonary embolism. N Engl J Med 349:1695–1702. doi:10.1056/NEJMe038112

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Turpie AG, Bauer KA, Eriksson BI et al (2002) Fondaparinux vs enoxaparin for the prevention of venous thromboembolism in major orthopedic surgery: a meta-analysis of 4 randomized double-blind studies. Arch Intern Med 162:1833–1840. doi:10.1001/archinte.162.16.1833

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Torbicki A, Perrier A, Konstantinides S et al (2008) Guidelines on the diagnosis and management of acute pulmonary embolism: the Task Force for the Diagnosis and Management of Acute Pulmonary Embolism of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J 29:2276–2315

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Yusuf S, Mehta SR, Chrolavicius S et al (2006) Effects of fondaparinux on mortality and reinfarction in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: the OASIS-6 randomized trial. JAMA 295:1519–1530. doi:10.1001/jama.295.13.joc60038

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Meyer G, Collignon MA, Guinet F et al (1990) Comparison of perfusion lung scanning and angiography in the estimation of vascular obstruction in acute pulmonary embolism. Eur J Nucl Med 17:315–319. doi:10.1007/BF01268022

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Meneveau N, Schiele F, Metz D et al (1998) Comparative efficacy of a two-hour regimen of streptokinase versus alteplase in acute massive pulmonary embolism: immediate clinical and hemodynamic outcome and one-year follow-up. J Am Coll Cardiol 31:1057–1063. doi:10.1016/S0735-1097(98)00068-0

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Meneveau N, Seronde MF, Blonde MC et al (2006) Management of unsuccessful thrombolysis in acute massive pulmonary embolism. Chest 129:1043–1050. doi:10.1378/chest.129.4.1043

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Wan S, Quinlan DJ, Agnelli G et al (2004) Thrombolysis compared with heparin for the initial treatment of pulmonary embolism: a meta-analysis of the randomized controlled trials. Circulation 110:744–749. doi:10.1161/01.CIR.0000137826.09715.9C

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Konstantinides S, Geibel A, Heusel G et al (2002) Heparin plus alteplase compared with heparin alone in patients with submassive pulmonary embolism. N Engl J Med 347:1143–1150. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa021274

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

This study was supported by an unrestricted grant from Glaxo Smith Kline laboratories.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nicolas Meneveau.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Janin, S., Meneveau, N., Mahemuti, A. et al. Safety and efficacy of fondaparinux as an adjunctive treatment to thrombolysis in patients with high and intermediate risk pulmonary embolism. J Thromb Thrombolysis 28, 320–324 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11239-008-0288-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11239-008-0288-9

Keywords

Navigation