Skip to main content
Log in

Enhancing autonomy-supportive I–Thou dialogue in schools: conceptualization and socio-emotional effects of an intervention program

  • Published:
Social Psychology of Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We present a conceptualization and a 2 year program of autonomy-supportive I–Thou dialogue among teachers and students that is based on self-determination theory (Deci and Ryan in Psychol Inq 11(4):227–268, 2000) and Buber’s (1960) philosophy. The program was applied in 18 seventh grade classes (420 students). Findings showed: (a) increases in positive emotions and in perceptions of teachers as conducting more dialogue on the relevance of studies to students’ lives, and (b) decreases in negative emotions and in classroom violence. The findings highlight the importance of autonomy-supportive I–Thou dialogue and suggest that such dialogue might help adolescents to experience studying and school as more pleasant and secure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderman E. M., Maehr M. L., Midgley C. (1999) Declining motivation after the transition to middle school: Schools can make a difference. Journal of Research and Development in Education 32: 131–147

    Google Scholar 

  • Assor A. (1995) Promoting personal and social growth in schools: A motivational analysis. In: Danilov J. (eds) Rethinking the goals of education. Position papers issued by the Pedagogical Secretariat. Ministry of Education (Hebrew), Jerusalem, pp 195–282

    Google Scholar 

  • Assor A. (1999) Value accessibility and teachers’ ability to encourage independent and critical thought in students. Social Psychology of Education 2: 1–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Assor A. (2001) Promoting intrinsic motivation for learning in schools. In: Kaplan A., Assor A. (eds) Education for thinking, 20, motivation for learning: New conceptions. Branco-Wise Institute (Hebrew), Jerusalem, pp 167–190

    Google Scholar 

  • Assor, A. (2002, May). Teacher-based, class-based, and self-based determinants of aggression in the classroom. In Paper presented at the 2nd international seminar on violence and adolescence, Tel Aviv, Israel.

  • Assor A. (2003) A model of a school that supports psychological needs and fosters emotional competence. In: Aviram R. (eds) Schools of the future. Masada (Hebrew), Tel Aviv, pp 165–210

    Google Scholar 

  • Assor, A., Alfi, O., Kaplan, H., Katz, I., Roth, G., Kaplan. A., & Tzuleng, K. (2000). Applying current motivational theories to promote extensive school reforms. In Symposium at the conference of the Israeli Educational Research Association (AYALA) in Tel Aviv.

  • Assor, A., Alfi, O., Kaplan, H., Roth, G., & Katz, I. (2000). The autonomy relatedness—competence (ARC) program. In Paper presented at the 7th workshop on achievement and task motivation, Lueven, Belgium.

  • Assor A., Eilot K. (2001) Values of Jewish Israeli children: Measurement, development, and gender effects. Megamot, special issue on “Children in Israel” 41: 148–179 (Hebrew)

    Google Scholar 

  • Assor A., Kaplan H. (2001) Mapping the domain of autonomy support: Five important ways to enhance or undermine student’s experience of autonomy in learning. In: Effklides A., Kuhl J., Sorrentino R. (eds) Trends and prospects in motivational research. Kluwer, Boston, pp 101–120

    Google Scholar 

  • Assor A., Kaplan H., Roth G., Kanat-Maymon Y. (2005) Directly controlling teacher behaviors as predictors of poor motivation and engagement in girls and boys: The role of anger and anxiety. Learning and Instruction 15: 397–413

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Assor A., Kaplan H., Roth G. (2002) Choice is good, but relevance is excellent: Autonomy-enhancing and suppressing teacher behaviors predicting students’ engagement in schoolwork. British Journal of Educational Psychology 72: 261–278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Assor A., Kaplan H., Feinberg O., Tal K. (2009) Promoting teachers’ internalization of practices combining vision with voice. A learning and implementation structure based on self-determination theory. Theory and Research in Education 7(2): 234–243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Assor A., Roth G., Deci E. L. (2004) The emotional costs of parents’ conditional regard: A self-determination theory analysis. Journal of Personality 72: 47–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buber, M. (1960). I and Thou (2nd edn.). (R. G. Smith, Trans.) New York: Scribner.

  • Buber M. (1959) The secret of dialogue: On man and his existential stance. The Bialik Institute (Hebrew), Jerusalem, Israel

    Google Scholar 

  • Buber M. (1955) Between man and man. Beacon Press, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Buck R. (1988) Human motivation and emotion. Wiley, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Connell, J. P., & Broom, J. (2004). ‘The toughest nut to crack: First things first’s (FTF) approach to improving teaching and learning. Report prepared for the US Department of Education. Philadelphia: Institute for Research and Reform in Education. Available at http://irre.org/publications/

  • Cook-Sather A. (2002) Authorizing students’ perspectives: Toward trust, dialogue and change in education. Educational Researcher 31(4): 3–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deci E. L. (2009) Large-scale school reform as viewed from the self-determination theory perspective. Theory and Research in Education 7: 244–252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deci E. L., Ryan R. M. (1985) Intrinsic motivation and self determination in human behavior. Plenum Press, New-York

    Google Scholar 

  • Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1991). A motivational approach to self: Integration in personality. In R. Dienstbier (Ed.), Nebraska symposium on motivation: Perspectives on motivation (Vol. 38, pp. 237–288). Lincoln, NE: University Of Nebraska Press.

  • Deci E. L., Ryan R. M. (2000) The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry 11(4): 227–268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deci, E. L., Ryan, R. M. (eds) (2002) Handbook of self-determination research. University of Rochester Press, Rochester, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Deci E. L., Ryan R. M. (2008) Facilitating optimal motivation and psychological well-being across life’s domains. Canadian Psychology 49: 14–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deci E. L., Ryan R. M., Gagné M., Leone D. R., Usunov J., Kornazheva B. P. (2001) Need satisfaction, motivation, and well-being in the work organizations of a former Eastern Bloc country. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 27: 930–942

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eccles J. S., Midgley C. (1989) Stage-environment fit: Developmentally appropriate classrooms for young adolescents. In: Ames C., Ames R. (eds) Research on motivation in education. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 139–188

    Google Scholar 

  • Eccles J. S., Lord S., Buchanan C. M. (1996) School transitions in early adolescence: What are we doing to our young people?. In: Graber J., Brooks-Gunn J., Petersen A. (eds) Transitions though adolescence: Interpersonal Domains and Context. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, N.J.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feinberg, O., Kaplan, H., Assor, A., & Kanat-Maymon, Y. (2005, August). SDT as a basis for a comprehensive school reform: Principles, description, and some outcomes. In Paper presented at EARLI conference, University of Cyprus, Nicosia.

  • Feinberg, O., Kaplan, H., Assor, A., & Kanat-Maymon, Y. (2006, September). Internalization of the SDT’ concepts and approach as a basis for a comprehensive school reform. In Paper presented at the 10th international conference on motivation, University of Koblenz-Landau, Landau, Germany.

  • Feinberg, A., Kaplan, H., Assor, A., & Kanat-Maymon, Y. (2008). Personal growth in a caring community: An autonomy-supportive program for reducing violence and enhancing considerateness. Dapim, 46, 21–61, Mofet Institute, Tel Aviv (Hebrew).

    Google Scholar 

  • Frijda N. H. (1999) Emotions and hedonic experience. In: Kahneman D., Diener E., Schwarz N. (eds) Well-being: The foundations of hedonic psychology. Russell Sage Foundation, New York, NY, pp 190–210

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein J. D., Iso-Ahola S. E. (2008) Determinants of parents’ “sideline rage” emotions and behaviors at youth soccer games. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 38: 1442–1462

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grolnick W. C., Deci E. L., Ryan R. M. (1997) Internalization within the family: The self-determination theory perspective. In: Grusec J. E., Kuczynski L. (eds) Parenting and children’s internalization of values: A handbook of contemporary theory. Wiley, New-York, pp 135–161

    Google Scholar 

  • Grolnick W. S., Ryan R. M. (1989) Parent styles associated with children’s self-regulation and competence in school. Journal of Educational Psychology 81: 143–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harter, S. (1981). A model of mastery motivation in children: Individual differences and development change. In W. A. Collins (Ed.), In The Minnesota symposium on child psychology (Vol. 14, pp. 215–255). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

  • Huberman M. (1993) The lives of teachers. Teachers College Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, H., & Assor, A. (1998a, January). Teachers’ response to students’ needs as a predictor of internalization of the value of learning. In Paper presented at the international research workshop on values, psychological structure, behavioral outcomes and inter generalization transmission of the Israel Science Foundation and Ben Gurion University, Maale Hachamisha, Israel.

  • Kaplan, H., & Assor, A. (1998b, March). The meaning and consequences of autonomy related teachers-actions for students: A developmental perspective. In Paper presented at the 6th international workshop on achievement and task motivation, Saloniki, Greece.

  • Kaplan H., Danino M. (2002) Diversity as challenge and opportunity for growth in school: Developing a caring community for students with learning disabilities. Hayeoz Hachinchi, the Journal of the Israeli Association of Educational Counselors, 11: 64–87 (Hebrew)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, H., Orenstein, E., Assor, A., Starkman., & Tzuleng, K. (2000). The call for dialogue: Exploring the qualities of meaningful dialogue between students and teachers concerning needs, satisfaction and its effect on students’ intrinsic motivation. In Paper presented at the 7th WATM, at Lueven University, Belgium.

  • Kaplan, H., Assor, A., & Roth, G. (2003a, April). Is autonomy important for children? Examining the effects of autonomy support and autonomy suppression at different ages. In Paper presented at the Society for Research in Child Development conference, Tampa, Florida.

  • Kaplan, H., Assor, A., & Roth, G. (2003b, April). Is autonomy important for all students? Evidence from a longitudinal study with children of different parental education. In Paper presented at the 84th annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago.

  • Katz I., Assor A. (2007) When choice motivates and when it does not. Educational Psychology Review 19: 429–442

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koestner R., Ryan R.M., Bernieri F., Holt K. (1984) Setting limits on children’s behavior: The differential effects of controlling versus informational styles on children’s intrinsic motivation and creativity. Journal of Personality 54: 233–248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kortzwiel D. (1978) Martin Buber and modern educational thought. Mofet. (Hebrew), Tel Aviv

    Google Scholar 

  • Kron T. (1994) Dialogical dimension in therapist–client and supervisor’s relations. In: Kron T., Yeroshalmi H. (eds) Supervision in psychotherapy. Magnes (Hebrew), Jerusalem, pp 18–19

    Google Scholar 

  • La Guardia J. G., Ryan R. M., Couchman C. E., Deci E. L. (2000) Within-person variation in security of attachment: A self-determination theory perspective on attachment, need fulfillment, and well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 79: 367–384

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levin H., Belfield C., Muennig P., Rouse C. (2006) The costs and benefits of an excellent education for all of America’s children. Teachers College, Columbia University, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Neighbors C., Vietor N.A., Knee C.R. (2002) A motivational model of driving anger and aggression. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 28: 324–335

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orenstein E., Openhimer D., Katz I., Feldman A., Binyamini D., & Shadmi H. (1996) Between teachers and learners: Part 2. The learning, investigating community. Ministry of Education. (Hebrew), Jerusalem

  • Reeve J. (2006) Teachers as facilitators: What autonomy-supportive teachers do and why their students benefit. Elementary School Journal 106: 225–236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reeve J., Assor A. (2011) Do social institutions necessarily suppress individuals’ need for autonomy? The possibility of schools as autonomy promoting contexts across the globe. In: Chirkov R., Ryan R. M., Sheldon K. (eds) Human autonomy in cross-cultural context: Global perspectives on the psychology of freedom and people’s well-being. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Reeve J., Jung H. (2006) What teachers say and do to support students’ autonomy during a learning activity. Journal of Educational Psychology 98: 209–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson P. W., WattH. M. G. (2006) Who chooses teaching and why? Profiling characteristics and motivations across three Australian universities. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 34(1): 27–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roth G., Assor A., Kanat-Maymon Y., Kaplan H. (2007) Perceived autonomy in teaching: How self-determined teaching may lead to self-determined learning. Journal of Educational Psychology 99: 761–774

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roth G., Kanat-Maymon Y., Bibi U. (2011) Prevention of school bullying: The important role of autonomy-supportive teaching and internalization of pro-social values. British Journal of Educational Psychology 81(4): 654–666

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan R. M. (1989) Social ontology and its relevance for psychological theory. New Ideas in Psychology 7: 115–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan R. M. (1991) The nature of the self in autonomy and relatedness. In: Strauss J., Goethals G. R. (eds) The self: Interdisciplinary approaches. Springer, New York, pp 208–238

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, R. M. (1993). Agency and organization: Intrinsic motivation, autonomy and the self in psychological development. In J. Jacobs (Ed.), Nebraska symposium on motivation: Developmental perspectives on motivation (Vol. 40, pp. 1–56). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.

  • Ryan R. M. (1995) Psychological needs and the facilitation of integrative processes. Journal of Personality 63(3): 397–427

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan R. M., Deci E. L. (2000) The darker and brighter sides of human existence: Basic psychological needs as a unifying concept. Psychological Inquiry 11: 319–338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan R. M., Deci E. L. (2000) Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist 55: 68–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan R. M., Deci E. L. (2002) An overview of self-determination theory: An organismic-dialectical perspective. In: Deci E. L., Ryan R. M. (eds) Handbook of self-determination research. University of Rochester Press, Rochester, NY, pp 3–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan R. M., Deci E. L. (2004) Autonomy is no illusion: Self-determination theory and the empirical study of authenticity, awareness, and will. In: Greenberg J., Koole S. L., Pyszczynski T. (eds) Handbook of experimental existential psychology. Guilford Press, New York, NY, pp 449–479

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan R. M., Grolnick W. S. (1986) Origins and pawns in the classroom: Self-report and projective assessments of children’s perceptions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 50: 550–558

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan R. M., Sheldon K. M., Kasser T., Deci E. L. (1996) All goals are not created equal: An organismic perspective on the nature of goals and their regulation. In: Gollwitzer P. M., Bargh J. A. (eds) The psychology of action: Linking cognition and motivation to behavior. Guilford Press, New York, pp 7–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Sher-Censor E., Parke R. D., Coltrane S. (2011) Parents’ promotion of psychological autonomy, psychological control, and Mexican–American adolescents’ adjustment. Journal of Youth & Adolescence 40: 620–632

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sfard A. (1998) On the two metaphors for learning and the dangers of choosing just one. Educational Researcher 27(2): 4–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner E. A., Belmont M. J. (1993) Motivation in the classroom: Reciprocal effects of teacher behavior and student engagement across the school year. Journal of Educational Psychology 85(4): 571–581

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soenens B., Vansteenkiste M., Niemiec C. P. (2009) Should parental prohibition of adolescents’ peer relationships be prohibited? The role of parental autonomy-support and control. Personal Relationships 16: 507–530

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solomon D., Battistisch V., Watson M., Schaps E., Lewis C. (2000) A six-district study of educational change: Direct and mediated effects of the child development project. Social Psychology of Education 4: 3–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watt M. G., Richardson P. W. (2008) Motivations, perceptions, and aspirations concerning teaching as a career for different types of beginning teachers. Learning and Instruction: Special Issue Motivation for Teaching 18: 408–428

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinstein N., Hodgins H. S., Ostvik-White E. (2011) Humor as aggression: Effects of motivation on hostility expressed in humor appreciation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 100: 1043–1055

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weinstock M., Assor A., Broide G. (2009) Schools as promoters of moral development: The essential role of teachers’ encouragement of critical thinking. Social Psychology of Education. 12: 137–151

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Haya Kaplan or Avi Assor.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kaplan, H., Assor, A. Enhancing autonomy-supportive I–Thou dialogue in schools: conceptualization and socio-emotional effects of an intervention program. Soc Psychol Educ 15, 251–269 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-012-9178-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-012-9178-2

Keywords

Navigation