Abstract
Within the published empirical record, a limited number of investigations exist that study the association between socio-political ideologies of preservice teachers and their attitudes toward disability-related matters within schools. To the extent that individual socio-political ideology and discomfort with disability remain mostly unexplored, this state of affairs may unwittingly compromise the capacity of future educators to assist students with special needs. The purpose of our study was to test relationships between preservice teachers’ conservative ideologies and discomfort with disability on the one hand and perceived negative attitudes toward students with disabilities and opposition to inclusion on the other. Our correlational findings indicate that preservice educators who report being higher in social dominance orientation, right-wing authoritarianism, economic and cultural conservatism, and discomfort with disabilities are more likely to oppose inclusion and to hold negative attitudes toward students with disabilities. Regression analyses revealed that social dominance orientation and discomfort with disability were stronger predictors of negative attitudes toward students with disabilities and opposition to inclusion than cultural conservatism/right-wing authoritarianism. These findings lend support to teacher preparation programs assisting preservice teachers in understanding (a) their attitudes toward inclusion and students with disabilities and (b) the impact their dispositions may have on their future effectiveness in supporting these students in their efforts to become productive and independent members of society.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Akrami N., Ekehammar B. (2006) Right-wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation: Their roots in Big Five personality factors and facets. Journal of Individual Differences 27: 117–126. doi:10.1027/1614-0001.27.3.117
Altemeyer B. (1996) The authoritarian specter. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA
Altemeyer, B. (1998). The other “authoritarian personality.” In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 30, pp. 47–92). San Diego: Academic Press.
Bäckström M., Björklund F. (2007) Structural modeling of generalized prejudice: The role of social dominance, authoritarianism, and empathy. Journal of Individual Differences 28: 10–17. doi:10.1027/1614-0001.28.1.10
Baron R.M., Kenny D.A. (1986) The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 51: 1173–1182. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173
Butler J.C.R. (2000) Personality and emotional correlates of right-wing authoritarianism. Social Behavior and Personality 28: 1–14. doi:10.2224/sbp.2000.28.1.1
Champlin D.P., Knoedler J.T. (2005) Wither, or wither, the good society?. Journal of Economic Issues 39: 455–463
Cohen J. (1988) Statistical power for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Erlbaum, Hillside, NJ
Cohrs J.C., Moschner B., Maes J., Kielmann S. (2005) The motivational bases of right-wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation: Relations to values and attitudes in the aftermath of September 11, 2001. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 31: 1425–1434. doi:10.1177/0146167205275614
Cornelis I., Van Hiel A. (2006) The impact of cognitive styles on authoritarianism based conservatism and racism. Basic and Applied Social Psychology 28: 37–50. doi:10.1207/s15324834basp2801_4
Crowson H.M., Brandes J.A. (2008) Explaining opposition to rights for individuals with disabilities: The roles of cultural conservatism, religious openness (versus closed-ness), and dangerous world beliefs. In: Becker M.S., Schneider J.N. (eds) Human Rights in the 21st Century. Nova Publishers, Hauppauge, NY, pp 151–166
Crowson H.M., Thoma S.J., Hestevold N. (2005) Is political conservatism synonymous with authoritarianism?. The Journal of Social Psychology 145: 571–592. doi:10.3200/SOCP.145.5.571-592
Council for Exceptional Children. (2008, January). News and issues—inclusion. Arlington, VA: Author. Retrieved January 18, 2008, from http://www.cec.sped.org/Content/NavigationMenu/NewsIssues/TeachingLearningCenter/ProfessionalPracticeTopicsInfo/Inclusion/default.htm.
De Witte, H. (1990). Conformisme, radicalisme en machteloosheid: Een onderzoek naar de sociaal-culturele en sociaal-economische opvattingen van arbeiders in Vlaanderen [Conformism, radicalism and powerlessness: Examining Flemish workers’ socio-cultural and socio-economical opinions]. Leuven, Belgium: HIVA, K.U. Leuven.
Duckitt, J. (2001). A dual-process cognitive-motivational theory of ideology and prejudice. In M.P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 33, pp. 41–113). San Diego: Academic Press.
Duckitt J. (2006) Differential effects of right-wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation on out-group attitudes and their mediation by threat from competitiveness to out-groups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 32: 684–696. doi:10.1177/0146167205284282
Duckitt J., Wagner C., du Plessis I., Birum I. (2002) The psychological bases of ideology and prejudice: Testing a dual process model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 83: 75–93. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.83.1.75
Duriez B., Van Hiel A. (2002) The march of modern fascism. A comparison of social dominance orientation and authoritarianism. Personality and Individual Differences 32: 1199–1213. doi:10.1016/S0191-8869(01)00086-1
Duriez B., Van Hiel A., Kossowska M. (2005) Authoritarianism and social dominance in Western and Eastern Europe: The importance of the sociopolitical context and of political interest and involvement. Political Psychology 26: 299–320. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9221.2005.00419.x
Ekehammar B., Akrami N., Gylje M., Zakrisson I. (2004) What matters most to prejudice: Big five personality, social dominance orientation, or right-wing authoritarianism?. European Journal of Personality 18: 463–482. doi:10.1002/per.526
Facts at a Glance. (2005). Association of State Units on Aging. Washington, D.C.
Feldman S.L. (2003) Enforcing social conformity: A theory of authoritarianism. Political Psychology 24: 41–74. doi:10.1111/0162-895X.00316
Johnson S.D., Tamney J.B. (2001) Social traditionalism and economic conservatism: Two conservative political ideologies in the United States. The Journal of Social Psychology 14: 233–243
Kavale K.A. (2002) Mainstreaming to full inclusion: From orthogenesis to pathogenesis of an idea. International Journal of Disability 49: 201–214. doi:10.1080/103491220141776
Kossowska M., Van Hiel A. (2003) The relationship between need for closure and conservative beliefs in Western and Eastern Europe. Political Psychology 24: 501–518. doi:10.1111/0162-895X.00338
Kreindler S.A. (2005) A dual group process model of individual differences in prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology Review 9: 90–107. doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr0902_1
Praisner C.L. (2003) Attitudes of elementary school principals toward the inclusion of students with disabilities. Exceptional Children 69: 135–143
Pratto F., Sidanius J., Stallworth L.M., Malle B.F. (1994) Social dominance orientation: A personality variable predicting social and political attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 67: 741–763. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.67.4.741
Ray J.J. (1973) Dogmatism in relation to sub-types of conservatism: Some Australian data. European Journal of Social Psychology 3: 221–232. doi:10.1002/ejsp.2420030302
Ray J.J. (1985) Defective validity in the Altemeyer authoritarianism scale. The Journal of Social Psychology 125: 271–272
Saucier G. (2000) Isms and the structure of social attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 78: 366–385. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.78.2.366
Sibley C.G., Wilson M.S., Duckitt J. (2007) Effects of dangerous and competitive worldviews on right-wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation over a five-month period. Political Psychology 28: 357–371. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9221.2007.00572.x
Sidanius J., Pratto F. (1999) Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK
U.S. Department of Education.(2005). To assure the free appropriate public, education of all children with disabilities: Twenty-fifth annual report to Congress on the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act. Washington, DC: Author.
U.S. Department of Education, Office of Special Education Programs, Data Analysis System (DANS), OMB# 1820-0043 (2006). Children with disabilities receiving special education under Part B of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, 2005.
Van Hiel A., Cornelis I., Roets A. (2007) Intervention role of social worldviews in the relationship between the Five-Factor Model of personality and social attitudes. European Journal of Personality 21: 131–148. doi:10.1002/per.618
Van Hiel A., Kossowska M. (2007) Contemporary attitudes and their ideological representation in Flanders (Belgium), Poland, and the Ukraine. International Journal of Psychology 42: 16–26. doi:10.1080/00207590500411443
Van Hiel A., Mervielde I. (2004) Openness to experience and boundaries in the mind: Relationships with cultural and economic conservative beliefs. Journal of Personality 72: 659–686. doi:10.1111/j.0022-3506.2004.00276.x
Van Hiel A., Pandelaere M., Duriez B. (2004) The impact of need for closure on conservative beliefs and racism: Differential mediation by authoritarian submission and authoritarian dominance. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 30: 824–837. doi:10.1177/0146167204264333
Watson D., Clark L.A., Tellegen A. (1988) Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 54: 1063–1070. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063
Wolfson A. (2004) Conservatives and neo-conservatives. The Public Interest 154: 32–48
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Brandes, J.A., Crowson, H.M. Predicting dispositions toward inclusion of students with disabilities: the role of conservative ideology and discomfort with disability. Soc Psychol Educ 12, 271–289 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-008-9077-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-008-9077-8