Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Predicting dispositions toward inclusion of students with disabilities: the role of conservative ideology and discomfort with disability

  • Published:
Social Psychology of Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Within the published empirical record, a limited number of investigations exist that study the association between socio-political ideologies of preservice teachers and their attitudes toward disability-related matters within schools. To the extent that individual socio-political ideology and discomfort with disability remain mostly unexplored, this state of affairs may unwittingly compromise the capacity of future educators to assist students with special needs. The purpose of our study was to test relationships between preservice teachers’ conservative ideologies and discomfort with disability on the one hand and perceived negative attitudes toward students with disabilities and opposition to inclusion on the other. Our correlational findings indicate that preservice educators who report being higher in social dominance orientation, right-wing authoritarianism, economic and cultural conservatism, and discomfort with disabilities are more likely to oppose inclusion and to hold negative attitudes toward students with disabilities. Regression analyses revealed that social dominance orientation and discomfort with disability were stronger predictors of negative attitudes toward students with disabilities and opposition to inclusion than cultural conservatism/right-wing authoritarianism. These findings lend support to teacher preparation programs assisting preservice teachers in understanding (a) their attitudes toward inclusion and students with disabilities and (b) the impact their dispositions may have on their future effectiveness in supporting these students in their efforts to become productive and independent members of society.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akrami N., Ekehammar B. (2006) Right-wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation: Their roots in Big Five personality factors and facets. Journal of Individual Differences 27: 117–126. doi:10.1027/1614-0001.27.3.117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Altemeyer B. (1996) The authoritarian specter. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Altemeyer, B. (1998). The other “authoritarian personality.” In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 30, pp. 47–92). San Diego: Academic Press.

  • Bäckström M., Björklund F. (2007) Structural modeling of generalized prejudice: The role of social dominance, authoritarianism, and empathy. Journal of Individual Differences 28: 10–17. doi:10.1027/1614-0001.28.1.10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baron R.M., Kenny D.A. (1986) The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 51: 1173–1182. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butler J.C.R. (2000) Personality and emotional correlates of right-wing authoritarianism. Social Behavior and Personality 28: 1–14. doi:10.2224/sbp.2000.28.1.1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Champlin D.P., Knoedler J.T. (2005) Wither, or wither, the good society?. Journal of Economic Issues 39: 455–463

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen J. (1988) Statistical power for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Erlbaum, Hillside, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohrs J.C., Moschner B., Maes J., Kielmann S. (2005) The motivational bases of right-wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation: Relations to values and attitudes in the aftermath of September 11, 2001. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 31: 1425–1434. doi:10.1177/0146167205275614

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cornelis I., Van Hiel A. (2006) The impact of cognitive styles on authoritarianism based conservatism and racism. Basic and Applied Social Psychology 28: 37–50. doi:10.1207/s15324834basp2801_4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crowson H.M., Brandes J.A. (2008) Explaining opposition to rights for individuals with disabilities: The roles of cultural conservatism, religious openness (versus closed-ness), and dangerous world beliefs. In: Becker M.S., Schneider J.N. (eds) Human Rights in the 21st Century. Nova Publishers, Hauppauge, NY, pp 151–166

    Google Scholar 

  • Crowson H.M., Thoma S.J., Hestevold N. (2005) Is political conservatism synonymous with authoritarianism?. The Journal of Social Psychology 145: 571–592. doi:10.3200/SOCP.145.5.571-592

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Council for Exceptional Children. (2008, January). News and issues—inclusion. Arlington, VA: Author. Retrieved January 18, 2008, from http://www.cec.sped.org/Content/NavigationMenu/NewsIssues/TeachingLearningCenter/ProfessionalPracticeTopicsInfo/Inclusion/default.htm.

  • De Witte, H. (1990). Conformisme, radicalisme en machteloosheid: Een onderzoek naar de sociaal-culturele en sociaal-economische opvattingen van arbeiders in Vlaanderen [Conformism, radicalism and powerlessness: Examining Flemish workers’ socio-cultural and socio-economical opinions]. Leuven, Belgium: HIVA, K.U. Leuven.

  • Duckitt, J. (2001). A dual-process cognitive-motivational theory of ideology and prejudice. In M.P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 33, pp. 41–113). San Diego: Academic Press.

  • Duckitt J. (2006) Differential effects of right-wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation on out-group attitudes and their mediation by threat from competitiveness to out-groups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 32: 684–696. doi:10.1177/0146167205284282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duckitt J., Wagner C., du Plessis I., Birum I. (2002) The psychological bases of ideology and prejudice: Testing a dual process model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 83: 75–93. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.83.1.75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duriez B., Van Hiel A. (2002) The march of modern fascism. A comparison of social dominance orientation and authoritarianism. Personality and Individual Differences 32: 1199–1213. doi:10.1016/S0191-8869(01)00086-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duriez B., Van Hiel A., Kossowska M. (2005) Authoritarianism and social dominance in Western and Eastern Europe: The importance of the sociopolitical context and of political interest and involvement. Political Psychology 26: 299–320. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9221.2005.00419.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ekehammar B., Akrami N., Gylje M., Zakrisson I. (2004) What matters most to prejudice: Big five personality, social dominance orientation, or right-wing authoritarianism?. European Journal of Personality 18: 463–482. doi:10.1002/per.526

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Facts at a Glance. (2005). Association of State Units on Aging. Washington, D.C.

  • Feldman S.L. (2003) Enforcing social conformity: A theory of authoritarianism. Political Psychology 24: 41–74. doi:10.1111/0162-895X.00316

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson S.D., Tamney J.B. (2001) Social traditionalism and economic conservatism: Two conservative political ideologies in the United States. The Journal of Social Psychology 14: 233–243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kavale K.A. (2002) Mainstreaming to full inclusion: From orthogenesis to pathogenesis of an idea. International Journal of Disability 49: 201–214. doi:10.1080/103491220141776

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kossowska M., Van Hiel A. (2003) The relationship between need for closure and conservative beliefs in Western and Eastern Europe. Political Psychology 24: 501–518. doi:10.1111/0162-895X.00338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kreindler S.A. (2005) A dual group process model of individual differences in prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology Review 9: 90–107. doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr0902_1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Praisner C.L. (2003) Attitudes of elementary school principals toward the inclusion of students with disabilities. Exceptional Children 69: 135–143

    Google Scholar 

  • Pratto F., Sidanius J., Stallworth L.M., Malle B.F. (1994) Social dominance orientation: A personality variable predicting social and political attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 67: 741–763. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.67.4.741

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ray J.J. (1973) Dogmatism in relation to sub-types of conservatism: Some Australian data. European Journal of Social Psychology 3: 221–232. doi:10.1002/ejsp.2420030302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ray J.J. (1985) Defective validity in the Altemeyer authoritarianism scale. The Journal of Social Psychology 125: 271–272

    Google Scholar 

  • Saucier G. (2000) Isms and the structure of social attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 78: 366–385. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.78.2.366

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sibley C.G., Wilson M.S., Duckitt J. (2007) Effects of dangerous and competitive worldviews on right-wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation over a five-month period. Political Psychology 28: 357–371. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9221.2007.00572.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sidanius J., Pratto F. (1999) Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Education.(2005). To assure the free appropriate public, education of all children with disabilities: Twenty-fifth annual report to Congress on the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act. Washington, DC: Author.

  • U.S. Department of Education, Office of Special Education Programs, Data Analysis System (DANS), OMB# 1820-0043 (2006). Children with disabilities receiving special education under Part B of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, 2005.

  • Van Hiel A., Cornelis I., Roets A. (2007) Intervention role of social worldviews in the relationship between the Five-Factor Model of personality and social attitudes. European Journal of Personality 21: 131–148. doi:10.1002/per.618

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Hiel A., Kossowska M. (2007) Contemporary attitudes and their ideological representation in Flanders (Belgium), Poland, and the Ukraine. International Journal of Psychology 42: 16–26. doi:10.1080/00207590500411443

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Hiel A., Mervielde I. (2004) Openness to experience and boundaries in the mind: Relationships with cultural and economic conservative beliefs. Journal of Personality 72: 659–686. doi:10.1111/j.0022-3506.2004.00276.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Hiel A., Pandelaere M., Duriez B. (2004) The impact of need for closure on conservative beliefs and racism: Differential mediation by authoritarian submission and authoritarian dominance. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 30: 824–837. doi:10.1177/0146167204264333

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watson D., Clark L.A., Tellegen A. (1988) Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 54: 1063–1070. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolfson A. (2004) Conservatives and neo-conservatives. The Public Interest 154: 32–48

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joyce A. Brandes.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Brandes, J.A., Crowson, H.M. Predicting dispositions toward inclusion of students with disabilities: the role of conservative ideology and discomfort with disability. Soc Psychol Educ 12, 271–289 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-008-9077-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-008-9077-8

Keywords

Navigation