Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Historic landscape change and habitat loss: the case of black grouse in Lower Saxony, Germany

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Landscape Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The declines of many specialist bird species in the agricultural landscapes of Central Europe have resulted in small and isolated populations. In the case of the black grouse, a ground-nesting bird species with large spatial requirements, empiric evidence about underlying landscape changes is scarce. In this study, we examined land cover and land cover changes in a farmland-forest mosaic in eastern Lower Saxony, Germany and how they affect occurrence and persistence of black grouse. Spatial information came from historic topographic maps from 1958 to 1975. The results show profound conversions of habitat to forest and farmland but also an increase in settlement area. Habitat conversions and suburbanization were negative correlates of black grouse persistence. Habitat models from before and after a decline period differed in some of the predictors and suggest black grouse habitat to be more diverse before the land cover changes. Our study confirms that land use factors at a landscape scale extent contribute to explain black grouse occurrence and thus can complement important small scale factors like the quality and size of individual habitat patches. Results also show that landscape factors affect black grouse distribution predominantly from an area much greater than an individual black grouse home range. Our models may be further evaluated on present-day landscapes and might be used to evaluate large-scale habitat availability for black grouse.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Addicott JF, Aho JM, Antolin MF, Padilla DK, Richardson JS, Soluk DA (1987) Ecological neighborhoods: scaling environmental patterns. Oikos 49(3):340–346. doi:10.2307/3565770

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benton TG, Vickery JA, Wilson JD (2003) Farmland biodiversity: is habitat heterogeneity the key? Trends Ecol Evol 18(4):182–188. doi:10.1016/S0169-5347(03)00011-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BirdLife International (2004) Birds in Europe: population estimates, trends and conservation status. BirdLife International, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Brüll H (1961) Birkwildforschung und Birkwildhege in Schleswig-Holstein. Zeitschr f Jagdwiss 7:104–126. doi:10.1007/BF01956526

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brüning K (ed) (1972) Der Landkreis Gifhorn, Lüneburg. Amtliche Kreisbeschreibung mit statistischem Anhang. Die Deutschen Landkreise. Handbuch für Verwaltung, Wirtschaft und Kultur. Reihe D. Die Landkreise in Niedersachsen, Bd. 26. Bremen-Horn, Dorn. Niedersächsisches Landesverwaltungsamt, Hannover

  • Donald PF, Green RE, Heath MF (2001) Agricultural intensification and the collapse of Europe’s farmland bird populations. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 268:25–29. doi:10.1098/rspb.2000.1325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gates S, Donald PF (2000) Local extinction of British farmland birds and the prediction of further loss. J Appl Ecol 37:806–820. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2664.2000.00549.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glänzer UW (1980) Über die Auswirkung von Landnutzungsänderungen auf Tierbiotope, dargestellt am Beispiel des Birkhuhns (Tetrao tetrix) in Bayern. Verhandlungen der Gesellschaft für Ökologie (Freising-Weihenstephan) Band VIII:151–162

  • Graf RF, Bollmann K, Suter W, Bugmann H (2005) The importance of spatial scale in habitat models: capercaillie in the Swiss Alps. Landscape Ecol 20:703–717. doi:10.1007/s10980-005-0063-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guisan A, Zimmermann NE (2000) Predictive habitat distribution models in ecology. Ecol Modell 135:147–186. doi:10.1016/S0304-3800(00)00354-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heckenroth H (1985) Birkhuhn Tetrao tetrix. In: Knolle F, Heckenroth H (eds). Die Vögel Niedersachsens—Hühner und Kranichvögel. Naturschutz und Landschaftspflege in Niedersachsen B 2.4:23–29

  • Heckenroth H, Laske V (1997) Atlas der Brutvögel Niedersachsens 1981–1995. Naturschutz Landschaftspflege Niedersachsen 37:1–329

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamieniarz R (1997) Changes in distribution and population size of black grouse in poland during 1982–1983 and 1993–1994. J Wildl Res 2(1):82–85

    Google Scholar 

  • Kasprzykowski Z (2002) Decline of the black grouse Tetrao tetrix population in east-central Poland. Vogelwelt 123:253–258

    Google Scholar 

  • Klaus S (1998) Zur Situation der waldbewohneneden Raufußhuhnarten Haselhuhn Bonasa bonasa, Auerhuhn Tetrao urogallus und Birkhuhn Tetrao tetrix in Deutschland. Ber z Vogelschutz 35:27–48

    Google Scholar 

  • Klaus S, Bergmann HH, Marti C, Müller F, Vitovic OA, Wiesner J (1990) Die Birkhühner. Neue Brehm-Bücherei. Ziemsen Verlag, Wittenberg Lutherstadt, p 288

    Google Scholar 

  • Krüger T, Herzog S (2000) Zur Entwicklung des Birkhuhnbestandes (Tetrao tetrix Linné) im sächsischen Erzgebirge von 1980 bis 2000. Zeitschr f Jagdwiss 46:180–187. doi:10.1007/BF02241356

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kurki S, Lindén H (1995) Forest fragmentation due to agriculture affects the reproductive success of the ground-nesting black grouse Tetrao tetrix. Ecography 18:109–113. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0587.1995.tb00330.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kurki S, Nikula A, Helle P, Lindén H (2000) Landscape fragmentation and forest composition effects on grouse breeding success in boreal forests. Ecology 81(7):1985–1997

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindström J, Rintamäki PT, Storch I (1998) Black grouse—BWP update. The journal of birds of the Western Palearctic (Oxford University Press, Oxford) 2:173–191

  • Loneux M, Ruwet JC (1997) Evolution des populations du tétras lyre Tetrao tetrix L. en Europe—un essai de synthčse. Cahiers d’Ethologie 17(2–4):287–343

    Google Scholar 

  • Ludwig T, Wübbenhorst J, Storch I (2005) Extinction patterns of black grouse subpopulations in Lower Saxony and an approach to their current matrix landscape composition. In: Proceedings of the 3rd European conference: black grouse endangered species of Europe. Ruthin/North Wales 2005

  • Ludwig T, Storch I, Wübbenhorst J (2008) How the black grouse was lost: historic reconstruction of its status and distribution in Lower Saxony (Germany). J Ornithol 149:587–596. doi:10.1007/s10336-008-0306-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGarigal K, Marks BJ (1995) FRAGSTATS: spatial pattern analysis program for quantifying landscape structure. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwestern Research Station, Portland

    Google Scholar 

  • Mikusinski G, Angelstam P (1997) Economic geography, forest distribution, and woodpecker diversity in central Europe. Conserv Biol 12(1):200–208. doi:10.1046/j.1523-1739.1998.96310.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monserud RA, Leemans R (1992) Comparing global vegetation maps with the kappa statistic. Ecol Modell 62:275–293. doi:10.1016/0304-3800(92)90003-W

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Müller M, Spaar R, Schifferli L, Jenni L (2005) Effects of changes in farming of subalpine meadows on a grassland bird, the whinchat (Saxicola rubetra). J Ornithol 146(1):14–23. doi:10.1007/s10336-004-0059-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nagelkerke NJD (1991) A note on a general definition of the coefficient of determination. Biometrika 78:691–692. doi:10.1093/biomet/78.3.691

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niebuhr O (1967) Der Elbe-Seitenkanal eine Gefahr für das größte Birkhuhnvorkommen der Bundesrepublik. Beitr Naturk Nieders 20:70

    Google Scholar 

  • Niewold FJJ (1990) The decline of the black grouse in The Netherlands. In: Lumeij JT, Hoogeveen YR (eds) The future of wild galliformes in The Netherlands. Organisatie Nederlandse Wilde Hoenders, Amersfoort, pp 71–81

    Google Scholar 

  • Niewold FJJ, Nijland H (1979) Zur Situation des Birkwildes (Lyrurus tetrix L.) in den Niederlanden. Zeitschr f Jagdwiss 25(4):207–211. doi:10.1007/BF02242492

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niewold FJJ, Nijland H (1987) Die Chancen des westeuropäischen Moor—und Heidebirkhuhns. Zeitschr f Jagdwiss 33:227–241. doi:10.1007/BF02241447

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pearce-Higgins JW, Grant MC, Robinson MC, Haysom SL (2007) The role of forest maturation in causing the decline of black grouse Tetrao tetrix. Ibis 149:143–155

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearson SM, Turner MG, Drake JB (1999) Landscape change and habitat availability in the southern appalachian highlands and olympic peninsula. Ecol Appl 9(4):1288–1304. doi:10.1890/1051-0761(1999)009[1288:LCAHAI]2.0.CO;2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sodeikat G (1997) Zur Bestandssituation des Birkwildes in drei niedersächsischen Projektgebieten nach mehrjährigen Auswilderungsaktionen. Sächsische Akademie für Natur und Umwelt. Internationale Fachtagung, Weißwasser, 18–20 April 1996

  • Soderström B, Part T (2000) Influence of landscape scale on farmland birds breeding in semi-natural pastures. Conserv Biol 14(2):522–533. doi:10.1046/j.1523-1739.2000.98564.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Storch I (2000) Conservation status and threats to grouse worldwide: an overview. Wildl Biol 6(4):195–204

    Google Scholar 

  • Storch I (2007) Grouse status survey and conservation action plan 2006–2010. WPA/BirdLife/SSC Grouse Specialist Group. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK and World Pheasant Association, Reading, UK. http://www.wildlife.uni-freiburg.de/downloads/Grouse%20AP-en/view. Accessed 4 Feb 2009

  • Utermark W (1956) Das Birkwild in der Lüneburger Heide. Der Bestand im Frühling 1956, die Ursachen seiner Abnahme und die Möglichkeiten zum Schutz der Restbestände [term paper], p 36

  • Wübbenhorst J, Prüter J (2007) Grundlagen für ein Artenhilfsprogramm “Birkhuhn in Niedersachsen”. Naturschutz Landschaftspflege Niedersachsen 42:1–114

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by PhD scholarships from Konrad-Adenauer-Foundation and FAZIT-Stiftung to Tobias Ludwig. Digitizing of the topographic maps would not have been possible without the support from Janosch Arnold, Thorsten Baier, and Vukan Lavadinovic. We very much acknowledge technical advice from Ulrich Michel.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tobias Ludwig.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ludwig, T., Storch, I. & Graf, R.F. Historic landscape change and habitat loss: the case of black grouse in Lower Saxony, Germany. Landscape Ecol 24, 533–546 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-009-9330-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-009-9330-3

Keywords

Navigation