Abstract
Thermal physics is in the realm of everyday experience, underlies current environmental concerns, and underpins studies in sciences, health and engineering. In the state of NSW in Australia, the coverage of thermal topics in high school is minimal, and, hence, so is the conceptual understanding of students. This study takes a new approach at exploring conceptions of students with a qualitative analysis facilitated by NVivo complemented with reference to sociocultural ideas of learning. A 2-part pen and paper question was given to 598 first year university students of different educational backgrounds (and therefore physics expertise). ‘The Question’ was based on 2 familiar scenarios and required the selection of a concept first, followed by an explanation. The results showed that concepts were favoured based on a student’s everyday experience and their curriculum through high school, and some were more effective than others in making scientifically congruent responses. The reported thermal physics alternative conceptions were also examined in our sample, and students’ reasoning behind such conceptions indicate that some conceptions do not inhibit scientifically congruent responses whilst others do. The results implicate language and the everyday experiences of the student in the teaching and learning of thermal physics.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adey, P. & Shayer, M. (1994). Really raising standards: Cognitive intervention and academic achievement. London: Routledge.
Bazeley, P. (2007). Qualitative data analysis with NVivo (2nd ed.). Los Angeles: Sage.
Brookes, D. T. (2006). The role of language in learning physics. PhD thesis, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick.
Chang, J., Lee, H. & Yen, C. (2010). Alternative conceptions about burning held by Atayal indigene students in Taiwan. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 8, 24.
Chiou, G.-L. & Anderson, R. (2010). A multi-dimensional cognitive analysis of undergraduate physics students’ understanding of heat conduction. International Journal of Science Education, 32(16), 29.
Christiansen, F. V. & Rump, C. (2007). Getting it right: Conceptual development from student to experienced engineer. European Journal of Engineering Education, 32(4), 12.
Clark, D. B. (2006). Longitudinal conceptual change in students’ understanding of thermal equilibrium: An examination of the process of conceptual restructuring. Cognition and Instruction, 24(4), 467–563.
di Sessa, A. A. (2008). A bird’s eye view of the ‘pieces’ vs. ‘coherence’ controversy (from the pieces side of the fence). In S. Vosniadou (Ed.), International handbook of research ion conceptual change (p. 13). New York: Routledge.
Driver, R., Asoko, H., Leach, J., Mortimer, E. & Scott, P. (1994). Constructing scientific knowledge in the classroom. Educational Researcher, 23(7), 5–12.
Duit, R. (2009). STCSE-Bibliography: Students’ and teachers’ conceptions and science education. Kiel: IPN Leibniz Institute for Science Education.
Erickson, G. L. (1979). Children’s conceptions’ of heat and temperature. Science Education, 63(2), 221–230.
Erickson, G. L. (1980). Children’s viewpoints of heat: A second look. Science Education, 64(3), 323–336.
Feldon, D. F. (2007). The implications of research on expertise for curriculum and pedagogy. Educational Psychology Review, 19(2), 91–110.
Georgiou, H. & Sharma, M. D. (2010). A report on a preliminary diagnostic for identifying thermal physics conceptions of tertiary students. International Journal of Innovation in Science and Mathematics Education, 18(2).
Granville, M. F. (1985). Student misconceptions in thermodynamics. Journal of Chemical Education, 62(10), 847–848.
Herrmann, F. (2004). Entropy from the beginning. Paper presented at the GIREP, Ostrava.
Hestenes, D., Wells, M. & Swackhamer, G. (1992). Force concept inventory. Physics Teacher, 30(March), 141–158.
Hewson, M. G. A. & Hamlyn, D. (1984). The influence of intellectual environment on conceptions of heat. European Journal of Science Education, 6(3), 245–262.
John-Steiner, V. & Mahn, H. (1996). Sociocultural approaches to learning and development: A Vygotskian framework. Educational Psychologist, 31(3/4), 191–206.
Leach, J. T. & Scott, P. H. (2008). Teaching for conceptual understanding: An approach drawing on individual and sociocultural perspectives. In S. Vosniadou (Ed.), International handbook of research on conceptual change. New York, NY: Routledge.
Lewis, E. L. & Linn, M. C. (1994). Heat energy and temperature concepts of adolescents, adults, and experts: Implications for curricular improvements. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31(6), 657–677.
Lombard, M., Snyder-Duch, J. & Bracken, C. C. (2002). Content analysis in mass communication: Assessment and reporting of intercoder reliability. Human Communication Research, 28(4), 587–604.
Loverude, M. E., Kautz, C. H. & Heron, P. R. L. (2002). Student understanding of the first law of thermodynamics: Relating work to the adiabatic compression of an ideal gas. American Journal of Physics, 70(2), 137–148.
Marin, E. (2006). Thermal physics concepts: The role of thermal effusivity. The Physics Teacher, 44(October), 432–434.
Meltzer, D.E. (2005). Investigation of student reasoning regarding concepts in thermal physics. American Physical Society Forum of Education Newsletter (Spring).
Moreira, M. A. & Santos, C. A. (1981). The influence of content organization on student’s cognitive structure in thermodynamics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 18(6), 525–531.
Morris, R. J. (1972). Lavoisier and the caloric theory. The British Journal for the History of Science, 6(21), 39.
New South Wales Board of Studies (2003). Science stages 4–5 syllabus. Sydney.
Özdemir, G. & Clark, D. B. (2007). An overview of conceptual change theories. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 3(4), 351–361.
Romer, R. H. (2001). Heat is not a noun. American Journal of Physics, 69(2), 3.
Strand-Cary, M. & Klahr, D. (2008). Developing elementary science skills: Instructional effectiveness and path independence. Cognitive Development, 23, 488–511.
Yeo, S. & Zadnik, M. (2001). Introductory thermal concept evaluation: Assessing students’ understanding. The Physics Teacher, 39, 496–504.
Zemansky, M. W. (1970). The use and misuse of the word ‘heat’ in physics teaching. The Physics Teacher, 8(6), 295–300.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Georgiou, H., Sharma, M.D. UNIVERSITY STUDENTS’ UNDERSTANDING OF THERMAL PHYSICS IN EVERYDAY CONTEXTS. Int J of Sci and Math Educ 10, 1119–1142 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-011-9320-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-011-9320-1