Abstract
There are gaps in the governance of phosphorus (P) across the value chain components (from “mine to fork”), within the monitoring and regulation of these components, and surrounding the role of stakeholders in the process. As a result the intrinsic objectives of a governance system for P are not well formulated and yet to be implemented. Phosphorus is a mineral and is produced and marketed much like other minerals. But since P is also an essential element in our food systems, critical for all forms of life and very dispersed in different products, it requires special attention concerning data collaboration especially regarding rock phosphate (RP) commercial reserves and potential resources. Policy leadership in this area is lacking and the world has no independent source of data or a governance system set up to provide independent monitoring of the knowledge and resource base. The science of P governance benefits from a review of how other minerals have been governed but also by taking a multi-level governance perspective to unpack the complexities. This study reviews key interacting factors affecting the need for governance including common perceptions surrounding P and fertilizers among producers and consumers, the highly skewed distribution of the global resource, the absence of the UN system in monitoring availability and consumption of RP resulting in uncertainty about the size of the commercial reserves, and the inefficiencies in various steps in the phosphate value chain from “mine to fork”. The paper provides an overview of governance opportunities including the realms of mining, agriculture and waste management, the respective parameters worth monitoring and regulating, the stakeholders involved and the associated objectives of the resulting improved governance. It provides some suggestions for policy priorities and a staged process of steps to achieve progress.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bache I, Flinders MV (eds) (2004) Multi-level governance. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Barnett LJ, Morse M (1963) The economics of natural resource availability. Johns Hopkins University Press for Resources for the Future, Baltimore
Beckerman W (1974) In defense of economic growth. Jonathan Cape, London
Brown AD (2003) Feed or feedback. Agriculture, population dynamics and the state of the planet. International Books, Utrecht
Butusov M, Jernelöv A (2013) Phosphorus—an element that could have been called Lucifer. Springer, London
Campbell J (2004) Institutional change and globalization. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Cole HSD, Freeman C, Jahoda M, Pavittet KLR (1973) Models of doom. Universe Books, New York
Cordell D (2010) The story of phosphorus: sustainability implications of global phosphorus scarcity for food security. Ph.D. thesis, University of Technology Sydney and Linköping University, 220 p
Cordell D, Drangert JO, White S (2009) The story of phosphorus: global food security and food for thought. Glob Environ Chang 19:292–305
de Ridder M, de Jong S, Polchar J, Lingemann S (2012) Risks and opportunities in the global phosphate rock market. Robust strategies in times of uncertainty. Center for Strategic Studies, Hague
EC (2014) Report on critical raw materials for the EU. Report of the ad hoc working group on defining critical raw materials, 41 p. http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/policies/raw-materials/files/docs/crm-report-on-critical-raw-materials_en.pdf. (Accessed 14 Mar 2015)
Edixhoven JD, Gupta J, Savenije HHG (2014) Recent revisions of phosphate rock reserves and resources: a critique. Earth Syst Dyn 5:491–507
Elser JJ, Elser TJ, Carpenter SR, Brock WA (2014) Regime shift in fertilizer commodities indicates more turbulence ahead for food security. PLoS One 9(5):1–7
FAO (2009) Declaration of the world summit on food security. FAO, Rome, 7 p. http://www.fao.org/fileadmin/templates/wsfs/Summit/Docs/Final_Declaration/WSFS09_Declaration.pdf. (Accessed 13 Mar 2015)
FAO (2015) Current world fertilizer trends and outlook to 2018. Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations, Rome
Foxon TJ (2008) Technological lock-in and the role of innovation. In: Atkinson G, Dietz S, Neumayer E (eds) Handbook of sustainable development. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp 140–152
Gibson C, Ostrom E, Ahn T (2000) The concept of scale and the human dimensions of global changes: a survey. Ecol Econ 32:217–239
Heckenmüller M, Narita D, Klepper G (2014) Global availability of phosphorus and its implications for global food supply: an economic overview. Kiel Working paper no. 1897, Kiel Institute for the World Economy, Kiel, 26 p
Hooghe L, Marks G (2001) Types of multi-level governance. Eur Integr Online Pap (EIoP) 5(11):1–24. http://eiop.or.at/eiop/texte/2001-011a.htm
Hooghe L, Marks G (2003) Unraveling the central state, but how? Types of multi-level governance. Am Polit Sci Rev 97(2):233–243
Hotelling H (1931) The economics of exhaustible resources. J Polit Econ 39:137–175
IFDC (2010) World phosphate reserves and resources. Technical bulletin T-75, 48 p
ISRIC (2012) Global distribution of soil phosphorus retention potential. ISRIC, Wageningen
Jordan-Meille L, Rubæk GH, Ehlert PAI, Genot V, Hofman G, Goulding K, Recknagel J, Provolo G, Barraclough P (2012) An overview of fertilizer-P recommendations in Europe: soil testing, calibration and fertilizer recommendations. Soil Use Manag 28(4):419–435
Keohane R, Ostrom E (eds) (1995) Local commons an global interdependence. Heterogeneity and cooperation in two domains. Sage, London
Marks G (1993) Structural policy and multi-level governance in the EC: In: Cafruny A, Rosenthal G (eds) The state of the European Community, vol 2: the Maastricht debates and beyond. Lynne Riener, Boulder, pp 402–403
Marks G, Hooghe L (2000) Optimality and authority: a critique of neo-classical theory. J Common Mark Stud 38:795–816
Meadows DH, Meadows DL, Randers J, Behrens WW III (1972) The limits to growth. Signet, New York
North D (1990) Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge University Press, New York
Ostrom E (1990) Governing the commons. The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Ott C, Rechberger H (2012) The European phosphorus balance. Resour Conserv Recycl 60:159–172
Pierson P (2000) Increasing returns, path dependence, and the study of politics. Am Polit Sci Rev 94(2):251–267
Pierson P (2004) Politics in time. History, institutions, and social analysis. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Radetzki M (1992) The decline and rise of the multinational corporation in the metal mineral industry. Resour Policy 18(1):2–8
Rosemarin A (2004) In a fix: the precarious geopolitics of phosphorus. Down to earth. Center for Science and Environment, Delhi, pp 27–31
Rosemarin A, de Bruijne G, Caldwell I (2009) Peak phosphorus: the next inconvenient truth. Broker 15:6–9
Schipper W (2014) Phosphorus: too big to fail. Eur J Inorg Chem 2014:1567–1571
Schröder JJ, Cordell D, Smit AL, Rosemarin A (2010) Sustainable use of phosphorus. Plant research international report no. 357. Wageningen University and Stockholm Environment Institute, Wageningen, 124 p
Sharpley AN, Bergström L, Aronsson H, Bechmann M, Bolster CH, Börling K, Djodjic F, Jarvie HP, Schoumans OF, Stamm C, Tonderski KS, Ulén B, Uusitalo R, Withers PJA (2015) Future agriculture with minimized phosphorus losses to waters: research needs and direction. Ambio 44(Suppl. 2):163–179. doi:10.1007/s13280-014-0612-x
Shields DJ, Šolar SV (2006) The nature and evolution of mineral supply choices. In: Proceedings of the 15th international symposium on mine planning and equipment selection, Torino, 20–22 September, pp 902–907
Simons A, Solomon D, Chibssa W, Blalock G, Lehmann J (2014) Filling the phosphorus fertilizer gap in developing countries. Nat Geosci. doi:10.1038/ngeo2049
Solar SV, Shields DJ, Miller MD (2009) Mineral policy in the era of sustainable development: historical context and future content. RMZ 56:304–321
Steffen W, Richardson K, Rockström J, Cornell SE, Fetzer I, Bennett EM, Biggs R, Carpenter SR, de Vries W, de Wit CA, Folke C, Gerten D, Heinke J, Mace GM, Persson LM, Ramanathan V, Reyers B, Sörlin S (2015) Planetary boundaries: guiding human development on a changing planet. Science. doi:10.1126/science.1259855
UN (2013) World population projected to reach 9.6 billion by 2050. www.un.org/en/development/desa/news/population/un-report-world-population-projected-to-reach-9-6-billion-by-2050.html. (Accessed 27 Aug 2015)
UNEP (2010) Building the foundations for sustainable nutrient management. GPNM. UNEP, Nairobi, 30 p
UNEP (2011) Phosphorus and food production. Year book. UNEP, Nairobi, pp 34–45
UNEP (2012) Responsible resource management for a sustainable world: findings from the international resource panel. UNEP, Paris, 36 p
USGS (2015) Rock phosphate. USGS, Washington, 2 p. http://minerals.usgs.gov/minerals/pubs/commodity/phosphate_rock/mcs-2015-phosp.pdf
Vaccari DA (2011) Phosphorus cycle issue—introduction. Chemosphere 84(6):735–736
Van Kauwenbergh S, Stewart M, Mikkelsen R (2013) World reserves of phosphate rock, a dynamic and unfolding story. Better Crops 97(3):19–20
Wellmer F, Becker-Platen J (2013) Global nonfuel mineral resources and sustainability. In: Proceedings of the workshop on deposit modeling, mineral resource assessment, and sustainable development. USGS, 16 p. http://pubs.usgs.gov/circ/2007/1294/paper1.html
Withers PJA, van Dijk KC, Neset T-SS, Nesme T, Oenema O, Rubæk GH, Schoumans OF, Smit B, Pellerin S (2015a) Stewardship to tackle global phosphorus inefficiency: the case of Europe. Ambio 44(Suppl. 2):S193–S206. doi:10.1007/s13280-014-0614-8
Withers PJA, Schipper WJ, Elser JJ, Hilton J, van Dijk KC, Ohtake H (2015b) Greening the global phosphorus cycle: how green chemistry can help achieve planetary P sustainability. Green Chem 17:2087–2099
Wyant KA, Corman JR, Elser JJ (eds) (2013) Phosphorus, food, and our future. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rosemarin, A., Ekane, N. The governance gap surrounding phosphorus. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 104, 265–279 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10705-015-9747-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10705-015-9747-9