Abstract
Pure interpretations of quantum theory, which throw away the classical part of the Copenhagen interpretation without adding new structure to its quantum part, are not viable. This is a consequence of a non-uniqueness result for the canonical operators.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Schmelzer, I.: Why the Hamilton operator alone is not enough. Found. Phys. 39, 486–498 (2009). arXiv:0901.3262
Ablowitz, M.J., Clarkson, P.A.: Solitons, nonlinear evolution equations and inverse scattering. London Mathematical Society Lecture Note Series, vol. 149. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1991)
Bell, J.S.: Beables for quantum field theory. Phys. Rep. 137, 49–54 (1986)
Bohm, D.: A suggested interpretation of the quantum theory in terms of “hidden” variables. Phys. Rev. 85, 166–193 (1952)
de Broglie, L.: La nouvelle dynamique des quanta, in Electrons et Photons: Rapports et Discussions du Cinquieme Conseil de Physique, ed. J. Bordet, Gauthier-Villars, Paris, pp. 105–132 (1928). English translation in: Bacciagaluppi, G., Valentini, A.: Quantum theory at the crossroads: reconsidering the 1927 Solvay Conference, Cambridge University Press. arXiv:quant-ph/0609184 (2006)
Brown, H.R.: Comment on Valentini “De Broglie-Bohm pilot-wave theory: many worlds in denial?” arXiv:0901.1278
Brown, H.R., Wallace, D.: Solving the measurement problem: de Broglie-Bohm loses out to Everett. Found. Phys. 35(4), 517 (2005). arXiv:quant-ph/0403094
Deutsch, D.: Comment on Lockwood. Br. J. Philos. Sci. 47, 222–228 (1996)
Everett, H.: “Relative state” formulation of quantum mechanics. Rev. Mod. Phys. 29(3), 454–462 (1957)
Ghirardi, G.C.: Collapse theories. In: Zalta, E.N. (ed.) The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2002 edition), available online at http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2002/entries/qm-collapse, 2002
Ghirardi, G., Rimini, A., Weber, T.: Unified dynamics for micro and macro systems. Phys. Rev. D 34, 470–491 (1986)
Griffiths, R.B.: Consistent histories and the interpretation of quantum mechanics. J. Stat. Phys. 36(12), 219–272 (1984)
Griffiths, R.B.: Quantum mechanics without measurements. arXiv:quant-ph/0612065 (2006)
Kent, A.: Real world interpretations of quantum theory. arXiv:0708.3710 (2007)
Mermin, N.D.: The Ithaca interpretation of quantum mechanics. Pramana 51, 549–565 (1998). arXiv:quant-ph/9609013
Nelson, E.: Derivation of the Schrödinger equation from Newtonian mechanics. Phys. Rev. 150, 1079–1085 (1966)
Saunders, S.: Time, decoherence and quantum mechanics. Synthese 102, 235–266 (1995)
Schmelzer, I.: A condensed matter interpretation of sm fermions and gauge fields. Found. Phys. 39(1), 73 (2009). arXiv:0908.0591
Tegmark, M.: The mathematical universe. Found. Phys. 38, 101–150 (2008)
Valentini, A.: De Broglie-Bohm pilot-wave theory: many worlds in denial? In: [22]. arXiv:0811.0810
Brown, H.R.: Comment on Valentini “De Broglie-Bohm pilot-wave theory: many worlds in denial?” In: [22]. arXiv:0901.1278
Saunders, S., Barrett, J., Kent, A., Wallace, D. (eds.) Many Worlds? Realism, Everett, and Quantum Mechanics. University Press, Oxford (2009)
Wallace, D.: Worlds in the Everett interpretation, studies in the history and philosophy of modern. Physics 33, 637–661 (2002). arXiv:quant-ph/0103092
Weinberg, S.: Living in the multiverse. arXiv:hep-th/0511037v1
Zeh, H.D.: Why Bohms quantum theory? arXiv:quant-ph/9812059
An exchange of letters in Physics Today on “Quantum theory without observers”, February 1999. www.math.rutgers.edu/~oldstein/papers/qtwoe/qtwoe.html
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Schmelzer, I. Pure Quantum Interpretations Are not Viable. Found Phys 41, 159–177 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10701-010-9484-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10701-010-9484-5