Abstract
In this commentary to Napoletani et al. (Foundations of Science 16:1–20, 2011), we put agnostic science in a wider historical context of philosophy of mathematics. Secondly, the parallel to Tukey’s “exploratory data analysis” will be discussed. Thirdly, it will be argued that what is new is the mutually interdependent dynamics of data (on which Napoletani et al. focus) and of computational modeling—which puts science closer to engineering and vice versa.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Efron, B. (2005). Bayesians, frequentists, and scientists. Journal of the American Statistical Association 100(469), presidential address, pp. 1–5.
Johnson, A., & Lenhard, J. (2011). Toward a new culture of prediction: Computational modeling in the era of desktop computing. In A. Nordmann, H. Radder, & G. Schiemann, Science transformed? Debating claims of an epochal break (pp. 189–199). Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
Krüger L., Daston L., Heidelberger M. (1987) The probabilistic revolution. vol. 1: Ideas in history. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Krüger L., Gigerenzer G., Morgan M. (1989) The probabilistic revolution, vol. 2: Ideas in the sciences. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Lenhard J. (2006) Models and statistical inference: The controversy between fisher and Neyman– Pearson. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 57: 69–91
Napoletani D., Panza M., Struppa D. C. (2011) Agnostic science: Towards a philosophy of data analysis. Foundations of Science 16: 1–20
Tukey J. W. (1962) The future of data analysis. Annals of Mathematical Statistics 33: 1–67
Tukey J. W. (1977) Exploratory data analysis. Addison-Wesley, Reading (Mass.)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lenhard, J. Coal to Diamonds. Found Sci 18, 583–586 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10699-012-9318-3
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10699-012-9318-3