Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

S3-Leitlinie Extracranielle Carotisstenose

Kapitel 8.6: Wie ist das periprozedurale (Operation, endovaskulär) Risiko bei Patienten mit asymptomatischen, symptomatischen oder bilateralen Stenosen? – Welche klinischen und morphologischen Faktoren sind mit einem erhöhten Risiko assoziiert?

  • Leitlinien
  • Published:
Gefässchirurgie Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Abb. 1
Abb. 2

Literatur

  1. Rothwell PM (2006) Symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid stenosis: How, when, and who to treat? Curr Atheroscler Rep 8:290–297

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Rothwell PM, Eliasziw M, Gutnikov SA et al (2003) Analysis of pooled data from the randomised controlled trials of endarterectomy for symptomatic carotid stenosis. Lancet 361:107–116

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Chambers BR, Donnan GA (2005) Carotid endarterectomy for asymptomatic carotid stenosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev:CD001923

    Google Scholar 

  4. Rothwell PM (2004) Effective stroke prevention in patients with symptomatic carotid stenosis. Cerebrovasc Dis 17(Suppl 1):89–104

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Naylor R, Cuffe RL, Rothwell PM et al (2003) A systematic review of outcome following synchronous carotid endarterectomy and coronary artery bypass: influence of surgical and patient variables. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 26:230–241

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Rerkasem K, Rothwell PM (2009) Temporal trends in the risks of stroke and death due to endarterectomy for symptomatic carotid stenosis: an updated systematic review. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 37:504–511

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Karkos CD, Hernandez-Lahoz I, Naylor AR (2009) Urgent carotid surgery in patients with crescendo transient ischaemic attacks and stroke-in-evolution: a systematic review. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 37:279–288

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Bonati LH, Dobson J, Algra A et al (2010) Short-term outcome after stenting versus endarterectomy for symptomatic carotid stenosis: a preplanned meta-analysis of individual patient data. Lancet 376:1062–1073

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Brott TG, Hobson RW, Howard G et al (2010) Stenting versus endarterectomy for treatment of carotid-artery stenosis. N Engl J Med 363:11–23

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Findlay JM, Tucker WS, Ferguson GG et al (1997) Guidelines for the use of carotid endarterectomy: current recommendations from the Canadian Neurosurgical Society. CMAJ 157:653–659

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Brott TG, Halperin JL, Abbara S et al (2011) ASA/ACCF/AHA/AANN/AANS/ACR/ASNR/CNS/SAIP/SCAI/SIR/SNIS/SVM/SVS Guideline on the Management of Patients With Extracranial Carotid and Vertebral Artery Disease: Executive Summary A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines, and the American Stroke Association, American Association of Neuroscience Nurses, American Association of Neurological Surgeons, American College of Radiology, American Society of Neuroradiology, Congress of Neurological Surgeons, Society of Atherosclerosis Imaging and Prevention, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Interventional Radiology, Society of NeuroInterventional Surgery, Society for Vascular Medicine, and Society for Vascular Surgery Developed in Collaboration With the American Academy of Neurology and Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 57:1002–1044

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Ricotta JJ, AbuRahma A, Ascher E et al (2011) Updated society for vascular surgery guidelines for management of extracranial carotid disease. J Vasc Surg 54:e1–31

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Bond R, Rerkasem K, Cuffe R, Rothwell PM (2005) A systematic review of the associations between age and sex and the operative risks of carotid endarterectomy. Cerebrovasc Dis 20:69–77

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Rerkasem K, Rothwell PM (2009) Systematic review of the operative risks of carotid endarterectomy for recently symptomatic stenosis in relation to the timing of surgery. Stroke 40:e564–e572

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Tallarita T, Oderich GS, Lanzino G et al (2011) Outcomes of carotid artery stenting versus historical surgical controls for radiation-induced carotid stenosis. J Vasc Surg 53:629–636

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Mozes G, Sullivan TM, Torres-Russotto DR et al (2004) Carotid endarterectomy in SAPPHIRE-eligible high-risk patients: Implications for selecting patients for carotid angioplasty and stenting. J Vasc Surg 39:958–966

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Abou-Zamzam AM Jr, Moneta GL, Landry GJ et al (2002) Carotid surgery following previous carotid endarterectomy is safe and effective. Vasc Endovascular Surg 36:263–270

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Bowser AN, Bandyk DF, Evans A et al (2003) Outcome of carotid stent-assisted angioplasty versus open surgical repair of recurrent carotid stenosis. J Vasc Surg 38:432–438

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Cho JS, Pandurangi K, Conrad MF et al (2004) Safety and durability of redo carotid operation: an 11-year experience. J Vasc Surg 39:155–161

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Jain S, Jain KM, Kumar SD et al (2007) Operative intervention for carotid restenosis is safe and effective. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 34:561–568

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Sadideen H, Taylor PR, Padayachee TS (2006) Restenosis after carotid endarterectomy. Int J Clin Pract 60:1625–1630

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Rothwell PM (2007) Making the most of secondary prevention. Stroke 38:1726

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Rothwell PM (2004) ACST: which subgroups will benefit most from carotid endarterectomy? Lancet 364:1122–1123

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Henderson RD, Eliasziw M, Fox AJ et al (2000) Angiographically defined collateral circulation and risk of stroke in patients with severe carotid artery stenosis. North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial (NASCET) Group. Stroke 31:128–132

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Kappelle LJ, Eliasziw M, Fox AJ et al (1999) Importance of intracranial atherosclerotic disease in patients with symptomatic stenosis of the internal carotid artery. The North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trail. Stroke 30:282–286

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Inzitari D, Eliasziw M, Sharpe BL et al (2000) Risk factors and outcome of patients with carotid artery stenosis presenting with lacunar stroke. North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial Group. Neurology 54:660–666

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Streifler JY, Eliasziw M, Benavente OR et al (1995) Lack of relationship between leukoaraiosis and carotid artery disease. The North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial. Arch Neurol 52:21–24

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Cywinski JB, Koch CG, Krajewski LP et al (2006) Increased risk associated with combined carotid endarterectomy and coronary artery bypass graft surgery: a propensity-matched comparison with isolated coronary artery bypass graft surgery. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 20:796–802

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Debing E, Van den BP (2006) Does the type, number or combinations of traditional cardiovascular risk factors affect early outcome after carotid endarterectomy? Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 31:622–626

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Stoner MC, Abbott WM, Wong DR et al (2006) Defining the high-risk patient for carotid endarterectomy: an analysis of the prospective National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. J Vasc Surg 43:285–295

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. (o A) (2008) Management of atherosclerotic carotid artery disease: clinical practice guidelines of the Society for Vascular Surgery. 480–486

  32. Ferguson GG, Eliasziw M, Barr HW et al (1999) The North American symptomatic carotid endarterectomy trial: surgical results in 1415 patients. Stroke 30:1751–1758

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Cao P, Giordano G, De Rango P et al (2000) Eversion versus conventional carotid endarterectomy: late results of a prospective multicenter randomized trial. J Vasc Surg 31:19–30

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Assadian A, Senekowitsch C, Pfaffelmeyer N et al (2004) Incidence of cranial nerve injuries after carotid eversion endarterectomy with a transverse skin incision under regional anaesthesia. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 28:421–424

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Kluk J, Grainger S, Nyamekye IK (2009) Is the retrojugular approach safer than the conventional approach for carotid endarterectomy? World J Surg 33:1533–1537

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Stehr A, Scodacek D, Wustrack H et al (2008) Retrojugular versus ventrojugular approach to carotid bifurcation for eversion endarterectomy: a prospective randomized trial. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 35:190–195

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Coscas R, Rhissassi B, Gruet-Coquet N et al (2010) Open surgery remains a valid option for the treatment of recurrent carotid stenosis. J Vasc Surg 51:1124–1132

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Asciutto G, Geier B, Marpe B et al (2007) A case of contained ruptured aortitis due to Clostridium septicum infection in a patient with a colon malignancy. Chir Ital 59:743–746

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Bond R, Rerkasem K, Naylor R, Rothwell PM (2004) Patches of different types for carotid patch angioplasty. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (electronic resource):CD000071

    Google Scholar 

  40. Borazjani BH, Wilson SE, Fujitani RM et al (2003) Postoperative complications of carotid patching: pseudoaneurysm and infection. Ann Vasc Surg 17:156–161

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Greenstein AJ, Chassin MR, Wang J et al (2007) Association between minor and major surgical complications after carotid endarterectomy: results of the New York carotid artery surgery study. J Vasc Surg 46:1138–1144

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Zanini MA, Gabarra RC, Faleiros AT et al (2000) Cerebral aneurysm and arachnoid cyst: about a case with intracystic hemorrhage. Arq Neuropsiquiatr 58:330–335

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Bangalore S, Kumar S, Wetterslev J et al (2011) Carotid artery stenting vs carotid endarterectomy: meta-analysis and diversity-adjusted trial sequential analysis of randomized trials. Arch Neurol 68:172–184

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Touze E, Trinquart L, Chatellier G, Mas JL (2009) Systematic review of the perioperative risks of stroke or death after carotid angioplasty and stenting. Stroke 40:e683–e693

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Fairman R, Gray WA, Scicli AP et al (2007) The CAPTURE registry: analysis of strokes resulting from carotid artery stenting in the post approval setting: timing, location, severity, and type. Ann Surg 246:551–556

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Gray WA, Yadav JS, Verta P et al (2007) The CAPTURE registry: predictors of outcomes in carotid artery stenting with embolic protection for high surgical risk patients in the early post-approval setting. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 70:1025–1033

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Matsumura JS, Gray W, Chaturvedi S et al (2010) CAPTURE 2 risk-adjusted stroke outcome benchmarks for carotid artery stenting with distal embolic protection. J Vasc Surg 52:576–583, 83

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Theiss W, Hermanek P, Mathias K et al (2008) Predictors of death and stroke after carotid angioplasty and stenting: a subgroup analysis of the Pro-CAS data. Stroke 39:2325–2330

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Grant A, White C, Ansel G et al (2010) Safety and efficacy of carotid stenting in the very elderly. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 75:651–655

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Stingele R, Berger J, Alfke K et al (2008) Clinical and angiographic risk factors for stroke and death within 30 days after carotid endarterectomy and stent-protected angioplasty: a subanalysis of the SPACE study. Lancet Neurol 7:216–222

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Howard VJ, Lutsep HL, Mackey A et al (2011) Influence of sex on outcomes of stenting versus endarterectomy: a subgroup analysis of the Carotid Revascularization Endarterectomy versus Stenting Trial (CREST). Lancet Neurol 10:530–537

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Liapis CD, Bell PR, Mikhailidis D et al (2009) ESVS guidelines. Invasive treatment for carotid stenosis: indications, techniques. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 37:1–19

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Naggara O, Touze E, Beyssen B et al (2011) Anatomical and technical factors associated with stroke or death during carotid angioplasty and stenting: results from the endarterectomy versus angioplasty in patients with symptomatic severe carotid stenosis (EVA-3S) trial and systematic review. Stroke 42:380–388

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Zahn R, Ischinger T, Hochadel M et al (2009) Carotid artery stenting: do procedural complications relate to the side intervened upon?: results from the Carotid Artery Stent (CAS)-Registry of the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Leitende Kardiologische Krankenhausarzte (ALKK). Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 74:1–8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Faggioli G, Ferri M, Rapezzi C et al (2009) Atherosclerotic aortic lesions increase the risk of cerebral embolism during carotid stenting in patients with complex aortic arch anatomy. J Vasc Surg 49:80–85

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Ohki T, Marin ML, Lyon RT et al (1998) Ex vivo human carotid artery bifurcation stenting: correlation of lesion characteristics with embolic potential. J Vasc Surg 27:463–471

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Reiter M, Bucek RA, Effenberger I et al (2006) Plaque echolucency is not associated with the risk of stroke in carotid stenting. Stroke 37:2378–2380

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Timaran CH, Rosero EB, Martinez AE et al (2010) Atherosclerotic plaque composition assessed by virtual histology intravascular ultrasound and cerebral embolization after carotid stenting. J Vasc Surg 52:1188–1194

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Yamada K, Yoshimura S, Kawasaki M et al (2011) Embolic complications after carotid artery stenting or carotid endarterectomy are associated with tissue characteristics of carotid plaques evaluated by magnetic resonance imaging. Atherosclerosis 215:399–404

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. Gonzalez A, Gil-Peralta A, Mayol A et al (2011) Internal carotid artery stenting in patients with near occlusion: 30-day and long-term outcome. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 32:252–258

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Kastrup A, Groschel K (2007) Carotid endarterectomy versus carotid stenting: an updated review of randomized trials and subgroup analyses. Acta Chir Belg 107:119–128

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. Moulakakis KG, Mylonas SN, Sfyroeras GS, Andrikopoulos V (2009) Hyperperfusion syndrome after carotid revascularization. J Vasc Surg 49:1060–1068

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Yavin D, Roberts DJ, Tso M et al (2011) Carotid endarterectomy versus stenting: a meta-analysis of randomized trials. Can J Neurol Sci 38:230–235

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Economopoulos KP, Sergentanis TN, Tsivgoulis G et al (2011) Carotid artery stenting versus carotid endarterectomy: a comprehensive meta-analysis of short-term and long-term outcomes. Stroke 42:687–692

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Silver FL, Mackey A, Clark WM et al (2011) Safety of stenting and endarterectomy by symptomatic status in the Carotid Revascularization Endarterectomy Versus Stenting Trial (CREST). Stroke 42:675–680

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Mas JL, Chatellier G, Beyssen B et al (2006) Endarterectomy versus stenting in patients with symptomatic severe carotid stenosis. N Engl J Med 355:1660–1671

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  67. Taha MM, Sakaida H, Asakura F et al (2007) Access site complications with carotid angioplasty and stenting. Surg Neurol 68:431–437

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Interessenkonflikt

Der korrespondierende Autor gibt für sich und seine Koautoren an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Klinik und Poliklinik für Vaskuläre und Endovaskuläre Chirurgie, Klinikum rechts der Isar der Technischen Universität München, Ismaninger Straße 22, 81675, München, Deutschland

    H.-H. Eckstein

  2. Zentrum der Neurologie und Neurochirurgie, Hirngefäßzentrum, Klinikum und Fachbereich Medizin der Johann Wolfgang Goethe-Universität Frankfurt, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590, Frankfurt am Main, Deutschland

    J. Berkefeld

Authors
  1. H.-H. Eckstein
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. J. Berkefeld
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to H.-H. Eckstein.

Additional information

Die Leitlinie Extracranielle Carotisstenose; Diagnostik, Therapie und Nachsorge wird bei der AWMF unter der Register-Nummer 004-028 geführt.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Eckstein, HH., Berkefeld, J. S3-Leitlinie Extracranielle Carotisstenose. Gefässchirurgie 17, 550–562 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00772-012-1058-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00772-012-1058-8

Search

Navigation