Abstract
Background
The retrojugular approach is promoted as an alternative to traditional antejugular carotid endarterectomy. Absence of named posterior venous branches and ease of distal internal carotid dissection reduce time for carotid exposure together with improved distal exposure. However, a higher incidence of local nerve injury and persistent hoarse voice has been reported. We compare the incidence of these and other complications for the antejugular and retrojugular approaches.
Design
This is a nonrandomised retrospective review of prospectively collected data on consecutive patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy.
Results
Our 178 patients formed two groups who were homogeneous in terms of sex and age. Mean operative times, patch usage, and general/local anaesthesia did not differ significantly for the two groups. Postoperative complications including transient ischemic attack (TIA), major stroke, or death; hypertension; miosis; and hypoglossal injury were similar for the two groups. However, there was a significantly increased incidence of persistent hoarse voice (p < 0.05) in the retrojugular group.
Conclusions
Reports of increased incidence of persistent hoarse voice associated with the retrojugular approach to carotid endarterectomy are supported by our findings, which point to a learning curve effect. A randomized controlled trial would be necessary before any strong recommendation could be made for or against the retrojugular approach.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Loftus CM, Kresowik TF (2000) Anatomic basis and technique of carotid endarterectomy. In: Loftus CM, Kresowik TF (eds) Carotid artery surgery. Thieme Medical Publishers Inc., New York
Safar HA, Doobay B, Evans G, Kazemi K, Jahromi A, Cina CS (2002) Retrojugular approach for carotid endarterectomy: a prospective cohort study. J Vasc Surg 35:737–740
North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial Collaborators (1991) Beneficial effect of carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients with high grade stenosis. N Engl J Med 325:445–453
MRC European Carotid Surgery Trial (1991) Interim results for symptomatic patients with severe (70–99%) or with mild (0–29%) carotid stenosis. Lancet 337:1235–1243
Beasley WD, Gibbons CP (2008) Cranial nerve injuries and the retrojugular approach in carotid endarterectomy. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 90:685–688
Menon NJ, Krijgsman B, Sciacca L, Arena G, Hamilton G (2005) The retrojugular approach to carotid endarterectomy—a safer technique. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 29:608–610
Assadian A, Senekowitsch C, Pfaffelmeyer N, Assadian O, Ptakovsky J, Hagmuller GW (2004) Incidence of cranial nerve injuries after carotid eversion endarterectomy with a transverse skin incision under regional anaesthesia. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2004:421–424
Neri E, Giubbolini M, Setacci F, Baldi I, Setacci C (2003) The retrojugular route: the ideal exposure for carotid endarterectomy performed under locoregional anaesthesia. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 26:250–255
Onwudike M (2006) Letter: the retrojugular approach to carotid endarterectomy—a safer technique. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 31:336
Stehr A, Scodacek D, Wustrack H, Steinbauer M, Topel I, Pfister K, Kasprzak PM (2008) Retrojugular versus ventrojugular approach to carotid bifurcation for eversion endarterectomy: a prospective randomized trial. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 35:190–195
AburRahma AF, Lim RY (1996) Management of vagus nerve injury after carotid endarterectomy. Surgery 119:245–247
Ballotta E, Da Giau G, Renon L, Narne S, Saladini M, Abruzzese E et al (1999) Cranial and cervical nerve injuries after carotid endarterectomy: a prospective study. Surgery 125:85–91
Schauber MD, Fontenelle LJ, Solomon JW, Hanson TL (1997) Cranial/ cervical nerve dysfunction after carotid endarterectomy. J Vasc Surg 25:481–487
Aldoori MI, Baird RN (1988) Local neurological complication during carotid endarterectomy. J Cardiovasc Surg 29:432–436
Naylor AR (2008) Invited commentary on retrojugular versus ventrojugular approach to carotid bifurcation for eversion endarterectomy: a prospective trial. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 35:196–197
Bevan K, Griffiths MV, Morgan MH (1988) Superior laryngeal nerve injury: an overlooked entity in the surgery of the head and neck. Br J Surg 75:817
Skillman JJ, Kent KC, Anninos E (1994) Do neck incisions influence nerve deficits after carotid endarterectomy? Arch Surg 129:748–752
Weaver K, Huang J, Tamargo RJ, Bernard EJ Jr (2004) Preoperative localization of the carotid bifurcation for carotid endarterectomy using magnetic resonance angiography without tomography: technical note. Neurosurgery 55:1227
Scavee V, Theys S, Schoevaerdts JC (2006) Does retrojugular route for carotid endarterectomy increase the risk of internal jugular vein thrombosis? Acta Chir Belg 106:397–399
Claydon M, Sieunarine K, Abbas M, Ponosh S, Tripathi R (2004) Letter. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 27:565–566
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kluk, J., Grainger, S. & Nyamekye, I.K. Is the Retrojugular Approach Safer Than the Conventional Approach for Carotid Endarterectomy?. World J Surg 33, 1533–1537 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-009-0052-0
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-009-0052-0