Skip to main content
Log in

Nonlinearity and complexity in gravel bed dynamics

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The dynamics of river bed evolution are known to be notoriously complex affected by near-bed turbulence, the collective motion of clusters of particles of different sizes, and the formation of bedforms and other large-scale features. In this paper, we present the results of a study aiming to quantify the inherent nonlinearity and complexity in gravel bed dynamics. The data analyzed are bed elevation fluctuations collected via submersible sonar transducers at 0.1 Hz frequency in two different settings of low and high discharge in a controlled laboratory experiment. We employed surrogate series analysis and the transportation distance metric in the phase-space to test for nonlinearity and the finite size Lyapunov exponent (FSLE) methodology to test for complexity. Our analysis documents linearity and underlying dynamics similar to that of deterministic diffusion for bed elevations at low discharge conditions. These dynamics transit to a pronounced nonlinearity and more complexity for high discharge, akin to that of a multiplicative cascading process used to characterize fully developed turbulence. Knowing the degree of nonlinearity and complexity in the temporal dynamics of bed elevation fluctuations can provide insight into model formulation and also into the feedbacks between near-bed turbulence, sediment transport and bedform development.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aberle J, Nikora V (2006) Statistical properties of armored gravel bed surfaces. Water Resour Res 42:W11414. doi:10.1029/2005WR004674

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arneodo A, Muzy JF, Roux SG (1997) Experimental analysis of self-similarity and random cascade processes: application to fully developed turbulence data. J Phys II 7:363–370

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Aurell E, Boffetta G, Crisanti A, Paladin G, Vulpiani A (1996a) Growth of noninfinitesimal perturbations in turbulence. Phys Rev Lett 77:1262–1265

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Aurell E, Boffetta G, Crisanti A, Paladin G, Vulpiani A (1996b) Predictability in systems with many characteristic times: the case of turbulence. Phys Rev E 53:2337–2349

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Aurell E, Boffetta G, Crisanti A, Paladin G, Vulpiani A (1997) Predictability in the large: an extension of the concept of Lyapunov exponent. J Phys A Math Gen 30:1–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Basu S, Foufoula-Georgiou E (2002) Detection of nonlinearity and chaoticity in time series using the transportation distance function. Phys Lett A 301:413–423

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Basu S, Foufoula-Georgiou E, Porté-Agel F (2002) Predictabilty of atmospheric boundary-layer flow as function of scale. Geophys Res Lett 29:2038. doi:10.1029/2002GL015497

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Best JL (1993) On the interactions between turbulent flow structure, sediment transport and bedform development: some considerations from recent experimental research. In: Clifford NJ, French JR, Hardisty J (eds) Turbulence: perspectives on flow and sediment transport. Wiley, NY

  • Blom A, Ribberink JS, de Vriend HJ (2003) Vertical sorting in bed forms: flume experiments with a natural and a trimodal sediment mixture. Water Resour Res 39:1025. doi:10.1029/2001WR001088

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boffetta G, Crisanti A, Paparella F, Provenzale A, Vulpiani A (1998) Slow and fast dynamics in coupled systems: a time series analysis view. Phys D 116:301–312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boffetta G, Cencini M, Falconi M, Vulpiani A (2002) Predictability: a way to characterize complexity. Phys Rep 356:367–474

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drake TG, Shreve RL, Dietrich WE, Whiting PJ, Leopold LB (1988) Bedload transport of fine gravel observed by motion pictures. J Fluid Mech 192:193–217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frisch U (1995) Turbulence: the legacy of A.N. Kolmogorov. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Gomez B, Phillips JD (1999) Deterministic uncertainty in bed load transport. J Hydraul Eng 125:305–308

    Google Scholar 

  • Gomez B, Naff RL, Hubbel DW (1989) Temporal variations in bedload transport rates associated with the migration of bedforms. Earth Surf Proc Land 14:135–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamamori A (1962) A theoretical investigation on the fluctuation of bedload transport. Delft Hydraulics Lab. Rep R4. Delft Hydraulics Laboratory, Delft

  • Hardy RJ, Lane SR, Ferguson RI, Parsons DR (2007) Emergence of coherent flow structures over a gravel surface: a numerical experiment. Water Resour Res 43:W03422. doi:10.1029/2006WR004936

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hegger R, Kantz H, Schreiber T (1999) Practical implementation of nonlinear time series methods: the Tisean package. Chaos 9:413–435

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hubbell DW, HH Stevens, JV Skinner and JP Beverage (1987) Laboratory data on coarse-sediment transport for bedload-sampler calibrations, U.S. Geological Survey Water-Supply Paper 2299. U.S. Geological Survey, Washington DC

  • Kantz H, Schreiber T (1997) Nonlinear time series analysis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

  • Kennel MB, Brown R, Abarbanel HDI (1992) Determining embedding dimension for phase-space reconstruction using a geometrical construction. Phys Rev A 45:3403–3411

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirkbride A (1993) Observations of the influence of bed roughness on turbulence structure in depth limited flows over gravel beds. In: Clifford NJ, French JR, Hardisty J (eds) Turbulence: perspectives on flow and sediment transport. Wiley, NY

  • Klaassen GJ (1990) Sediment transport in armoured rivers during floods-literature survey. Tech. Rep. Q790, Delft Hydraulics, Delft, The Netherlands

  • Kleinfelter N, Moroni M, Cushman JH (2005) Application of finite-size lyapunov exponent to particle tracking velocitmetry in fluid mechanics experiments. Phys Rev E 72:056306

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lorenz EN (1969) The predictability of a flow which possesses many scales of motion. Tellus 21:289–307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moeckel R, Murray B (1997) Measuring the distance between time series. Phys D 102:187–194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson JM, Shreve RL, McLean R, Drake TG (1995) Role of near-bed turbulence structure in bed load transport and bed form mechanics. Water Resour Res 31:2071–2086

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nikora V, Walsh J (2004) Water-worked gravel surfaces: high-order structure functions at the particle scale. Water Resour Res 40:W12601. doi:10.1029/2004WR003346

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parker G (1991) Some random notes on grain sorting. In: Proceedings of grain sorting seminar IAHR, pp 20–76

  • Schreiber T, Schmitz A (1996) Improved surrogate data for nonlinearity tests. Phys Rev Lett 77:635–638

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Seminara G (1998) Stability and morphodynamics. Meccanica 33:59–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh A, Fienberg K, Jerolmack DJ, Marr JG, Foufoula-Georgiou E (2008) Experimental evidence for statistical scaling and intermittency in sediment transport rates. J Geophys Res Earth (in press)

  • Theiler J, Eubank S, Longtin A, Galdrikian B, Farmer JD (1992) Testing for nonlinearity in time series: the method of surrogate data. Phys D 58:77–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilcock PR, McArdell BW (1993) Surface-based fractional transport rates: mobilization thresholds and partial transport of a sand-gravel sediment. Water Resour Res 29:1297–1312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilcock PR, McArdell BW (1997) Partial transport of sand/gravel sediment. Water Resour Res 33:235–245

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the National Center for Earth-surface Dynamics (NCED), a Science and Technology Center funded by NSF under agreement EAR-0120914. The support by the Joseph T. and Rose S. Ling Professorship in Environmental Engineering at the University of Minnesota is also gratefully acknowledged. A series of experiments (known as StreamLab06) were conducted at the St. Anthony Falls Laboratory as part of an NCED program to examine physical-biological aspects of sediment transport (http://www.nced.umn.edu). Computer resources were provided by the Minnesota Supercomputing Institute, Digital Technology Center at the University of Minnesota. The authors are grateful to David Olsen for his assistance in the preparation of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Arvind Singh.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Singh, A., Lanzoni, S. & Foufoula-Georgiou, E. Nonlinearity and complexity in gravel bed dynamics. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 23, 967–975 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-008-0269-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-008-0269-8

Keywords

Navigation