Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

CT-guided percutaneous neurolytic celiac plexus block technique

  • Published:
Abdominal Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Up to now, the studies in the world have demonstrated that CT-guided percutaneous neurolytic celiac plexus block (PNCPB) is an invaluable therapeutic modality in the treatment of refractory abdominal pain caused by cancer. Its efficacy of pain relief varied in reported studies. The main technical considerations which would affect the analgesic effects on abdominal pain included the patients’ cooperation, needle entry approaches, combined use of blocking approaches, localization of the target area, dosage of the blocker, and so on. A success of PNCPB depends greatly on close cooperation with patients. The patient should be educated about the purpose and steps of the procedure, and trained of breathing in and breathing hold. The needle entry can be divided into the posterior approach and the anterior approach. The former one is the most commonly used in clinical practice, but the latter one is rarely used except in the cases that the posterior approach becomes technically difficult. Bilateral multiple blocking of celiac plexus and splanchnic nerves is often required to achieve optimal analgesia. The needle entry site, insertion course, and depth should be preselected and simulated on CT monitor prior to the procedure in order to ensure an accurate and safe celiac plexus block. The magnitude of analgesic effect is closely related to the degree of degeneration and necrosis of the celiac plexus. Maximally filling with blocker in the retropancreatic space is an indication of sufficient blocking. We also provided an overview of indications and contraindications, preoperative preparations, complications and its treatment of PNCPB.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 6.
Fig. 7.
Fig. 8.
Fig. 9.
Fig. 10.
Fig. 11.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Iki K, Fujita Y, Inada H, et al. (2003) Celiac plexus block: evaluation of injectate spread by three-dimensional computed tomography. Abdom Imaging 28(4):571–573

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Busch EH, Kay D, Branting SB (2003) Low volume neurolytic celiac plexus block with computed tomography guidance. Anesthesiology 99(5):1243–1244

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Pusceddu C, Mameli S, Pili A, et al. (2003) Percutaneous neurolysis of the celiac plexus under CT guidance in the invasive treatment of visceral pain caused by cancer. Tumori 89(4 Suppl):286–291

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. De Cicco M, Matovic M, Bortolussi R, et al. (2001) Celiac plexus block: injectate spread and pain relief in patients with regional anatomic distortions. Anesthesiology 94(4):561–565

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Hong YY (1996) Neurolytic celiac plexus block should include contrast media. Anesthesiology 84(3):748–749

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Ina H, Kitoh T, Kobayashi M, et al. (1996) New technique for the neurolytic celiac plexus block: the transintervertebral disc approach. Anesthesiology 85(1):212–217

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Toraiwa S, Ohara T, Yamanaka H, et al. (2004) The transintervertebral disc approach for educational practice of the neurolytic celiac plexus block. Masui 53(7):820–824

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Plancarte-Sanchez R, Mayer-Rivera F, del Rocio Guillen Nunez M, et al. (2003) Transdiscal percutaneous approach of splanchnic nerves. Cir Cir 71(3):192–203

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Takahashi M, Yoshida A, Ohara T, et al. (2003) Silent gastric perforation in a pancreatic cancer patient treated with neurolytic celiac plexus block. J Anesth 17(3):196–198

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. de Oliveira R, dos Reis MP, Prado WA (2004) The effects of early or late neurolytic sympathetic plexus block on the management of abdominal or pelvic cancer pain. Pain 110(1, 2):400–408

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Staats PS, Hekmat H, Sauter P, et al. (2001) The effects of alcohol celiac plexus block, pain, and mood on longevity in patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study. Pain Med 2(1):28–34

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Firdousi FH, Sharma D, Raina VK (2002) Palliation by celiac plexus block for upper abdominal visceral cancer pain. Trop Doct 32(4):224–226

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Polati E, Finco G, Gottin L, et al. (1998) Prospective randomized double-blind trial of neurolytic celiac plexus block in patients with pancreatic cancer. Br J Surg 85(2):199–201

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Mercadante S, Nicosia F (1998) Celiac plexus block: a reappraisal. Reg Anesth Pain Med 23(1):37–48

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Yamamuro M, Kusaka K, Kato M, et al. (2000) Celiac plexus block in cancer pain management. Tohoku J Exp Med 192(1):1–18

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Weber JG, Brown DL, Stephens DH, et al. (1996) Celiac plexus block. Retrocrural computed tomographic anatomy in patients with and without pancreatic cancer. Reg Anesth 21(5):407–413

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. De Cicco M, Matovic M, Balestreri L, et al. (1997) Single-needle celiac plexus block: is needle tip position critical in patients with no regional anatomic distortions? Anesthesiology 87(6):1301–1308

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Prasanna A (1996) Unilateral celiac plexus block. J Pain Symptom Manage 11(3):154–157

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Eisenberg E, Carr DB, Chalmers TC (1995) Neurolytic celiac plexus block for treatment of cancer pain: a meta-analysis. Anesth Analg 80(2):290–295

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Bodley J (1995) Celiac plexus block for patients with cancer pain. Prof Nurse 10(5):278–280

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Iftikhar S, Loftus EV Jr (1998) Gastroparesis after celiac plexus block. Am J Gastroenterol 93(11):2223–2225

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Ischia S, Polati E, Finco G, et al. (2000) Celiac block for the treatment of pancreatic pain. Curr Rev Pain 4(2):127–133

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Davies (1993) Incidence of major complication of neurolytic celiac plexus block. J R Soc Med 86:264–266

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Navarro-Martinez J, Montes A, Comps O, et al. (2003) Retroperitoneal abscess after neurolytic celiac plexus block from the anterior approach. Reg Anesth Pain Med 28(6):528–530

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to P. J. Wang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wang, P.J., Shang, M.Y., Qian, Z. et al. CT-guided percutaneous neurolytic celiac plexus block technique. Abdom Imaging 31, 710–718 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-006-9153-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-006-9153-5

Keywords

Navigation