Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Prospective study of 310 patients: can early CT predict the severity of acute pancreatitis?

  • Published:
Abdominal Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

This study was designed to determine the most important early CT parameters predictive of acute pancreatitis severity.

Methods

Three hundred and seventy-one consecutive patients with acute abdominal pain and hyperamylasemia were enrolled. Three hundred and ten of the 371 patients met our inclusion criteria. Acute pancreatitis severity was evaluated using the 1992 Atlanta criteria. Different CT parameters were reported from the admission abdominal CT by two radiologists blinded from any clinical parameter, but the patients’ age and gender. These variables were fitted in a binary logistic regression model.

Results

Acute pancreatitis was mild in 80% cases, severe in 20% cases and lethal in 12.69% cases. The following CT parameters were significantly associated with the severity of acute pancreatitis: the objective size of the pancreas (P = 0.001), the peripancreatic fat abnormalities (P = 0.001) and the extent of necrosis (P = 0.007). Moreover, the age of the patient revealed itself a highly significant (P = 0.001) indicator of disease severity. The association of the four CT criteria eventually showed a sensitivity of 73% and a specificity of 81% to predict acute pancreatitis severity.

Conclusion

Although these criteria correlated with disease severity, our study identified that morphological CT criteria cannot be used to triage patients with severe and mild acute pancreatitis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Neoptolemos JP, et al. (2000) Early prediction of severity in acute pancreatitis by urinary trypsinogen activation peptide: a multicentre study. Lancet 355(9219):1955–1960

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Kylanpaa-Back ML, Kemppainen E, Puolakkainen P (2002) Trypsin-based laboratory methods and carboxypeptidase activation peptide in acute pancreatitis. Jop 3(2):34–48

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bradley EL III (1993) A clinically based classification system for acute pancreatitis. Summary of the International Symposium on Acute Pancreatitis, Atlanta, GA, September 11 through 13. Arch Surg 128(5):586–590

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Balthazar EJ (2002) Acute pancreatitis: assessment of severity with clinical and CT evaluation. Radiology 223(3):603–613

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Anglade D, et al. (2000) Is it useful to maintain specific scores for the early determination of the severity of acute pancreatitis? Ann Chir 125(4):325–333

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Wilson C, Heath DI, Imrie CW (1990) Prediction of outcome in acute pancreatitis: a comparative study of APACHE II, clinical assessment and multiple factor scoring systems. Br J Surg 77(11):1260–1264

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Balthazar EJ, et al. (1990) Acute pancreatitis: value of CT in establishing prognosis. Radiology 174(2):331–336

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Ranson JH, et al. (1974) Prognostic signs and the role of operative management in acute pancreatitis. Surg Gynecol Obstet 139(1):69–81

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Blamey SL, et al. (1984) Prognostic factors in acute pancreatitis. Gut 25(12):1340–1346

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Pezzilli R, Billi P, Morselli-Labate AM (1998) Severity of acute pancreatitis: relationship with etiology, sex and age. Hepatogastroenterology 45(23):1859–1864

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Halonen KI, et al. (2000) Severe acute pancreatitis: prognostic factors in 270 consecutive patients. Pancreas 21(3):266–271

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Company L, et al. (2003) Factors predicting mortality in severe acute pancreatitis. Pancreatology 3(2):144–148

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. London NJ, et al. (1991) Rapid-bolus contrast-enhanced dynamic computed tomography in acute pancreatitis: a prospective study. Br J Surg 78(12):1452–1456

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Clavien PA, et al. (1988) Value of contrast-enhanced computerized tomography in the early diagnosis and prognosis of acute pancreatitis. A prospective study of 202 patients. Am J Surg 155(3):457–466

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Vesentini S, et al. (1993) Prospective comparison of C-reactive protein level, Ranson score and contrast-enhanced computed tomography in the prediction of septic complications of acute pancreatitis. Br J Surg 80(6):755–757

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Lankisch PG, et al. (2002) The APACHE II score is unreliable to diagnose necrotizing pancreatitis on admission to hospital. Pancreas 24(3):217–222

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Balthazar EJ, Freeny PC, van Sonnenberg E (1994) Imaging and intervention in acute pancreatitis. Radiology 193(2):297–306

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Hill MC, et al. (1982) Acute pancreatitis: clinical vs. CT findings. Am J Roentgenol 139(2):263–269

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Kemppainen E, et al. (1996) Early localization of necrosis by contrast-enhanced computed tomography can predict outcome in severe acute pancreatitis. Br J Surg 83(7):924–929

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Ranson JH, et al. (1985) Computed tomography and the prediction of pancreatic abscess in acute pancreatitis. Ann Surg 201(5):656–665

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Paulson EK, et al. (1999) Acute pancreatitis complicated by gland necrosis: spectrum of findings on contrast-enhanced CT. Am J Roentgenol 172(3):609–613

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Baron TH, Morgan DE (1999) Acute necrotizing pancreatitis. N Engl J Med 340(18):1412–1417

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Balthazar EJ (2002) Staging of acute pancreatitis. Radiol Clin North Am 40(6):1199–1209

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Lankisch PG, et al. (2001) Do we need a computed tomography examination in all patients with acute pancreatitis within 72 h after admission to hospital for the detection of pancreatic necrosis? Scand J Gastroenterol 36(4):432–436

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Block S, et al. (1986) Identification of pancreas necrosis in severe acute pancreatitis: imaging procedures versus clinical staging. Gut 27(9):1035–1042

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Rau B, et al. (1997) Surgical treatment of infected necrosis. World J Surg 21(2):155–161

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Beger HG, et al. (1997) Natural course of acute pancreatitis. World J Surg 21(2):130–135

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Schmid SW, et al. (1999) The role of infection in acute pancreatitis. Gut 45(2):311–316

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

S. Demuylder

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Radiology, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland

    A. -S. Knoepfli, C. D. Becker & P. -A. Poletti

  2. Institut de Radiologie, Clinique des Grangettes, 7, chemin des Grangettes, 1224 Chêne-Bougeries, Geneva, Switzerland

    K. Kinkel

  3. Department of Surgery, Clinic of Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland

    T. Berney & P. Morel

Authors
  1. A. -S. Knoepfli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. K. Kinkel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. T. Berney
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. P. Morel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. C. D. Becker
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. P. -A. Poletti
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. -S. Knoepfli.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Knoepfli, A.S., Kinkel, K., Berney, T. et al. Prospective study of 310 patients: can early CT predict the severity of acute pancreatitis?. Abdom Imaging 32, 111–115 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-006-9034-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-006-9034-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation