Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

An Indigenous Drought-Tolerant Strain of Glomus intraradices Associated with a Native Bacterium Improves Water Transport and Root Development in Retama sphaerocarpa

  • Published:
Microbial Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The effects of interactions between Bacillus thuringiensis, a drought-adapted bacterium, and two isolates of Glomus intraradices, an arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungus, on Retama sphaerocarpa, a drought-adapted legume, were investigated. The fungal isolates were an indigenous drought-tolerant and a nonindigenous drought-sensitive isolate. Shoot length and root growth, symbiotic parameters, water transport (in terms of percent relative plant water uptake), and volumetric soil moisture and soil enzymatic activities in response to microbial inoculations were evaluated. Retama plants colonized by G. intraradices plus Bacillus possessed similar shoot length after 30 days from sowing compared with noninoculated Retama plants after 150 days. Inoculation with drought-adapted bacterium increased root growth by 201%, but maximum root development was obtained by co-inoculation of B. thuringiensis and the indigenous G. intraradices. Nodules were formed only in plants colonized by autochthonous AM fungi. Relative water uptake was higher in inoculated than in noninoculated Retama plants, and these inoculants depleted soil water content concomitantly. G. intraradices-colonized Retama reached similar shoot length irrespective of the fungal origin, but there were strong differences in relative water uptake by plants colonized by each one of the fungi. Indigenous G. intraradices-colonized roots (evaluated as functional alkaline phosphatase staining) showed the highest intensity and arbuscule richness when associated with B. thuringiensis. The interactive microbial effects on Retama plants were more relevant when indigenous microorganisms were involved. Co-inoculation of autochthonous microorganisms reduced by 42% the water required to produce 1 mg of shoot biomass. This is the first evidence of the effectiveness of rhizosphere bacterium, singly or associated with AM fungus, in increasing plant water uptake, which represents a positive microbial effect on plants grown under drought environments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Allen, EB, Allen, MF (1986) Water relations of xeric grasses in the field: interactions of mycorrhizas and competition. New Phytol 104: 559–571

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Augé, RM (2001) Water relations, drought and vesicular–arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis. Mycorrhiza 11: 3–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Azcón, R (1993) Growth and nutrition of nodulated mycorrhizal and non-mycorrhizal Hedysarum coronarium as a result of treatments with fractions from a plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria. Soil Biol Biochem 25: 1037–1042

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Barea, JM (1997) Mycorrhiza/bacteria interactions on plant growth promotion. In: Ogoshi, A, Kobayashi, L, Homma, Y, Kodama, F, Kondon, N, Akino, S (Eds.) Plant Growth-Promoting Rhizobacteria, Present Status and Future Prospects. OCDE, Paris, pp 150–158

    Google Scholar 

  5. Barea, JM (2000) Rhizosphere and mycorrhiza of field crops. In: Balázs, E, Galante, E, Lynch, JM, Schepers, JS, Toutant, JP, Werner, D, Werry, PATJ (Eds.) Biological Resource Management: Connecting Science and Policy. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp 110–125

    Google Scholar 

  6. Barea, JM, Gryndler, M, Lemanceau, Ph, Schüepp, H, Azcón, R (2002) The rhizosphere of mycorrhizal plants. In: Gianinazzi, S, Schüepp, H, Barea, JM, Haselwandter, K (Eds.) Mycorrhiza Technology in Agriculture: From Genes to Bioproducts. Birkhäuser Verlag, Basel, Switzerland, pp 1–18

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bearden, BN, Petersen, L (2000) Influence of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on soil structure and aggregate stability of vertisols. Plant Soil 218: 173–183

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Bryla, DR, Duniway, JM (1997) Growth, phosphorus uptake, and water relations of safflower and wheat infected with an arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus. New Phytol 136: 581–590

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Caravaca, F, Alguacil, MD, Díaz, G, Roldán, A (2003) Use of nitrate reductase activity for assessing effectiveness of mycorrhizal symbiosis in Dorycnium pentaphyllum under induced water deficit. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 34: 2291–2302

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Caravaca, F, Figueroa, D, Alguacil, MM, Roldan, A (2003) Application of composted urban residue enhanced the performance of afforested shrub species in a degraded semiarid land. Bioresour Technol 90: 65–70

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Galleguillos, C, Aguirre, C, Barea, JM, Azcón, R (2000) Growth promoting effect of two Sinorhizobium meliloti strains (a wild type and its genetically modified derivative) on a non-legume plant species in specific interaction with two arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Plant Sci 159: 57–63

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. García, C, Hernández, MT, Costa, F (1997) Potential use of dehydrogenase activity as an index of microbial activity in degraded soils. Commun Soil Sci Plant Nutr 28: 123–134

    Google Scholar 

  13. Giovannetti, L, Ventura, S, Bazzicalupo, M, Fani, R, Materassi, R (1990) DNA restriction fingerprint analysis of the soil bacterium Azospirillum. J Gen Microbiol 136: 1161–1166

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Gordon, SA, Weber, RP (1950) Colorimetric estimation of indole acetic acid. Plant Physiol 26: 192–195

    Google Scholar 

  15. Hall, JA, Pierson, D, Ghosh, S, Glick, BR (1996) Root elongation in various agronomic crops by the plant growth promoting rhizobacteria Pseudomonas putida GR 12-2. Isr J Plant Sci 44: 37–42

    Google Scholar 

  16. Jastrow, JD, Miller, RM (1991) Methods for assessing the effects of biota on soil structure. Agric Ecosyst Environ 34: 279–303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Jeffries, P, Barea, JM (2001) Arbuscular Mycorrhiza—a key component of sustainable plant–soil ecosystems. In: Hock, B (Ed.) The Mycota. Vol. IX, Fungal Associations. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp 95–113

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kennedy, AC, Smith, KL (1995) Soil microbial diversity and the sustainability of agricultural soils. Plant Soil 170: 75–86

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Koide, RT (1993) Physiology of the mycorrhizal plant. Adv Plant Pathol 9: 33–54

    Google Scholar 

  20. Kramer, PJ, Boyer, JS (1993) Water Relations of Plants and Soils. Academic Press, San Diego, CA

    Google Scholar 

  21. Lachica, M, Aguilar, A, Yañez, J (1973) Análisis foliar, métodos utilizados en la Estación Experimental del Zaidín. An Edafol Agrobiol 32: 1033–1047

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Linderman, RG, Davis, EA (2001) Comparative response of selected grapevine rootstocks and cultivars to inoculation with different mycorrhizal fungi. Am J Enol Vitic 52: 8–11

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Marulanda, A, Azcón, R, Ruíz-Lozano, JM (2003) Contribution of six arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal isolates to water uptake by Lactuca sativa plants under drought stress. Physiol Plant 119: 526–533

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Masciandaro, G, Ceccanti, B, García, C (1994) Anaerobic digestion of straw and piggery wastewater: II. Optimization of the process. Agrochimica 3: 195–203

    Google Scholar 

  25. Miller, RM, Jastrow, JD (1990) Hierarchy of root and mycorrhizal fungi interactions with soil aggregation. Soil Biol Biochem 22: 579–584

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Mitchell, JW, Brunstetter, BC (1939) Colorimetric methods for the quantitative estimation of indole-3-acetic acid. Bot Gaz 100: 802–816

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Monzón, A, Azcón, R (1996) Relevance of mycorrhizal fungal origin and host plant genotype to inducing growth and nutrient uptake in Medicago species. Agric Ecosyst Environ 60: 9–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Monzón, A, Azcón, R (2001) Growth responses and N and P use efficiency of three Alnus species as affected by arbuscular–mycorrhizal colonisation. Plant Growth Regul 35: 97–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Moreno-Ortego, JL, Falchini, L, Renella, G, Landi, L, Nannipieri, P (1999) Use of the ecological dose (ED50) to assess to toxicity of Cd on soil microbial and biochemical parameters. In: Dick, RP (Ed.) Enzymes in the Environment: Activity Ecology & Applications, Granada, Spain, July 12–15, p 129

  30. Naseby, DC, Lynch, JM (1997) Rhizosphere soil enzymes as indicators of perturbations caused by enzyme substrate addition and inoculation of a genetically modified strain of Pseudomonas fluorescens on wheat seed. Soil Biol Biochem 29: 1353–1362

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Phillips, JM, Hayman, DS (1970) Improved procedure of clearing roots and staining parasitic and vesicular–arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi for rapid assessment of infection. Trans Br Mycol Soc 55: 159–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Requena, N, Jeffries, P, Barea, JM (1996) Assessment of natural mycorrhizal potential in a desertified semiarid ecosystem. Appl Environ Microbiol 62: 842–847

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Requena, N, Jiménez, I, Barea, JM (1996) Bacteria–mycorrhiza interactions in land restoration. In: Azcón-Aguilar C, Barea JM (Eds.) Mycorrhizas in Integrated Systems. From Genes to Plant Development. COST 821, Bruselas, pp 657–660

  34. Requena, N, Jimenez, I, Toro, M, Barea, JM (1997) Interactions between plant-growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR), arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and Rhizobium spp. in the rhizosphere of Anthyllis cytisoides, a model legume for revegetation in Mediterranean semi-arid ecosystems. New Phytol 136: 667–677

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Roth, CH, Malicki, MA, Plagge, R (1992) Empirical evaluation of the relationship between soil dielectric constant and volumetric water content as the basis for calibrating soil moisture measurements. J Soil Sci 43: 1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Ruíz-Lozano, JM, Azcón, R (1995) Hyphal contribution to water uptake in mycorrhizal plants as affected by the fungal species and water status. Physiol Plant 95: 472–478

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Ruíz-Lozano, JM, Gómez, M, Azcón, R (1995) Influence of different Glomus species on the time-course of physiological plant-responses of lettuce to progressive drought stress periods. Plant Sci 110: 37–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Smith, SE, Gianinazzi-Pearson, V (1990) Phosphate uptake and arbuscular activity in mycorrhizal Allium cepa L. Effects of photon irradiance and phosphate nutrition. Aust J Plant Physiol 17: 177–188

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Tabatabai, MA (1982) Soil enzymes. In: Page, AL, Miller, EM, Keeney, DR (Eds.) Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 2, 2nd edn, Agronomy Monograph 9. ASA and SSSA, Madison, WI, pp 501–538

  40. Tabatabai, MA, Bremner, JM (1969) Use of p-nitrophenyl phosphate for assay of soil phosphatase activity. Soil Biol Biochem 1: 301–307

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Tisserant, B, Gianinazzi-Pearson, V, Gianinazzi, S, Gollotte, A (1993) In planta histochemical staining of fungal alkaline phosphatase activity for analysis of efficient arbuscular mycorrhizal infections. Mycol Res 97: 245–250

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Trouvelot, A, Fardeau, JC, Plenchette, C, Gianinazzi, S, Gianinazzi-Pearson, V (1986) Nutritional balance and symbiotic expression in mycorrhizal wheat. Physiol Veg 24: 300

    Google Scholar 

  43. Valdenegro, M, Barea, JM, Azcón, R (2001) Influence of arbuscular–mycorrhizal fungi, Rhizobium meliloti strains and PGPR inoculation on the growth of Medicago arborea used as model legume for re-vegetation and biological reactivation in a semi-arid Mediterranean area. Plant Growth Regul 34: 233–240

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Varma, A, Hoock, B (1998) Mycorrhiza: Structure, Function, Molecular Biology and Biotechnology. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  45. Vilariño, A, Arines, J (1990) An instrumental modification of Gerdeman and Nicolson's method for extracting VAM fungal spores from soil samples. Plant Soil 121: 211–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Vivas, A, Biró, B, Ruíz-Lozano, JM, Barea, JM, Azcón, R (2006) Two bacterial strains isolated from a Zn-polluted soil enhance plant growth and mycorrhizal efficiency under Zn-toxicity. Chemosphere 62: 1523–1533

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Vivas, A, Marulanda, A, Ruíz-Lozano, JM, Barea, JM, Azcón, R (2003) Influence of a Bacillus sp. on physiological activities of two arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and on plant responses to PEG-induced drought stress. Mycorrhiza 13: 249–256

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. White, I, Knight, JH, Zegelin, SJ, Topp, GC (1994) Comments to ‘considerations on the use of time-domain reflectometry (TDR) for measuring soil water content’ by WR Whalley. J Soil Sci 45: 503–508

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Wöhler, I (1997) Auxin-indole derivatives in soils determined by a colorimetric method and by high performance liquid chromatography. Microbiol Res 152: 399–405

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. Azcón.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Marulanda, A., Barea, J.M. & Azcón, R. An Indigenous Drought-Tolerant Strain of Glomus intraradices Associated with a Native Bacterium Improves Water Transport and Root Development in Retama sphaerocarpa . Microb Ecol 52, 670–678 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00248-006-9078-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00248-006-9078-0

Keywords

Navigation