Skip to main content
Log in

Use of selected sourdough lactic acid bacteria to hydrolyze wheat and rye proteins responsible for cereal allergy

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
European Food Research and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This work was aimed at showing the capacity of selected sourdough lactic acid bacteria to hydrolyze wheat and rye allergens. Hydrolysis was investigated after wheat sourdough fermentation and after treatment of wheat and rye sourdough breads with pepsin, trypsin and pancreatin, which mimicked the digestive process. As shown by immunoblotting with sera from allergic patients, wheat sourdough fermentation caused the disappearance of some IgE-binding proteins (albumins/globulins and gliadins mainly) with respect to the chemically acidified dough used as the control. The IgE-binding protein profile of wheat and rye sourdough breads differed from those of baker's yeast breads. The signals of the IgE-binding proteins contained in the sourdough breads disappeared after in vitro digestion with pepsin, trypsin and pancreatin. The same effect by digestive enzymes was not found for baker's yeast breads which showed persistent IgE-binding proteins. As shown by ELISA inhibition assays, the presence of IgE-binding low molecular weight proteins/peptides in sourdough breads significantly decreased with respect to baker's yeast breads. Proteolytic activity by selected sourdough lactic acid bacteria may have an importance during food processing to produce pre-digested wheat and rye dough which contains IgE-binding proteins degradable by digestive enzymes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kay AB (2001) J Med 344:30–37

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Kay AB (2001) J Med 344:109–113

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Sampson HA, Sicherer SH, Birnbaum AH (2001) Gastroenterology 120:1026–1040

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Nowak-Wegrzyn A, Conover-Walker MK, Wood RA (2001) Arch Pediatr 155:790–795

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Schafer T, Bohler E, Ruhdorfer S, Weigi L, Wessner D, Heinrich J, Filipiak B, Wichmann HE, Ring J (2001) Allergy 56:1172–1179

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Johansson SG, Hourihane JO, Bousquet J, Bruijnzeel-Coomen C, Dreborg S, Haahtela T, Cowalski ML, Myjind N, Ring J, van Cauwenberge P, van Hage-Hamsten M, Wuthrich B (2001) Allergy 56:813–824

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Palosuo K, Alenius H, Varjonen N, Kalkkinen N, Reunala T (2001) Clin Exp Allergy 31:466–473

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Battais F, Pineau F, Popineau Y, Aparicio C, Kanny G, Guerin L, Moneret-Vautrin DA, Denery-Papini S (2003) Clin Exp Allergy 33:962–970

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Singh J, Blundell M, Tanner G, Skerritt J (2001) J Cereal Sci 34:85–103

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Varjonen E, Vainio E, Kalimo K (1997) Clin Exp Allergy 27:162–166

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Weiss W, Vogelmeier C, Gorg A (1993) Electrophoresis 14:805–816

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization, Rome, Italy) (1998) FAOSTAT Statistical database. http://faostat.fao.org/faostat/

  13. Shewry PR, Parmar S, Milfin BJ (1983) Cereal Chem 60:1–6

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Bischoff S, Crowe SE (2005) Gastroenterology 128:1089–1113

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Garcìa-Casado G, Armentia A, Sànchez-Monge R, Malpica JM, Salcedo G (1996) Clin Exp Allergy 26:428–435

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. International Union of Immunological Societies (2005) Allergen Nomenclature Subcommittee. http://www.allergen.org

  17. Baldo BA, Wringley CW (1978) Clin Allergy 8:109–124

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Ortolani C, Ispano M, Scibilia J, Pastorello EA (2001) Allergy 56:5–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Astwood DJ, Leach JN, Fuchs RL (1996) Nat Biotechnol 14:1269–1273

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Davis PJ, Smales CM, James DC (2001) Allergy 67:56–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Di Cagno R, De Angelis M, Auricchio S, Greco L, Clarke C, De Vincenzi M, Giovannini C, D'Archivio M, Landolfo F, Parrilli G, Minervini F, Arendt E, Gobbetti M (2004) Appl Environ Microbiol 70:1088–1096

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Di Cagno R, De Angelis M, Lavermicocca P, De Vincenzi M, Giovannini C, Faccia M, Gobbetti M (2002) Appl Environ Microbiol 68:623–633

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Bindslev-Jensen C (2004) Allergy 56:75–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Simonato B, Pasini G, Giannattasio M, Peruffo ADB, De Lazzari F, Curioni A (2001) J Agric Food Chem 49:5668–5673

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Simonato B, Pasini G, De Zorzi M, Vegro M, Curioni A (2004) Ital J Food Sci 16:151–163

    Google Scholar 

  26. Laemmli UK (1970) Nature 227:680–685

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Bradford MM (1976) Anal Biochem 72:248–254

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Pasini G, Simonato M, Giannattasio M, Peruffo ADB, Curioni A (2001) J Agric Food Chem 49:2254–2261

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Vermeirssen V, Van Camp J, Devos L, Verstraete W (2003) J Agric Food Chem 51:5680–5687

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Curioni A, Santucci B, Cristaudo A, Canistraci C, Pietravalle M, Simonato B, Giannattasio M (1999) Clin Exp Allergy 29:407–413

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Diaz-Perales A, Blanco C, Sanchez-Monge R, Varala J, Carrello T, Salcedo G (2003) J Allergy Clin Immunol 112:1002–1007

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Church FC, Swaisgood HE, Porter DH, Catignani GL (1983) J Dairy Sci 66:1219–1227

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. SAS/STAT (1985) Guide for personal computers, vol. 5. SAS Institute, Cary, NC

    Google Scholar 

  34. Tazikawa T, Arakawa H, Tokuyama K, Morikawa A (2001) Int Arch Allergy Immunol 125:51–56

    Google Scholar 

  35. Mittag D, Niggermann B, Sander I, Reese I, Fiedler EM, Worm M, Vieths S, Reese G (2004) Mol Nutr Food Res 48:380–389

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Gobbetti M, De Angelis M, Corsetti A, Di Cagno R (2005) Trends Food Sci Technol 16:57–69

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Crespo JF, Rodriguez J (2003) Allergy 58:98–113

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. von der Weid T, Ibnou-Zekri N, Pfeifer A (2002) Dig Liver Dis 21:25–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Macdougall CF, Cant AJ, Colver AF (2002) Arch Dis Child 86:236–239

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Helm RM (2004) Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol 4:125–129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. ILSI Europe Session (2004) In: 9th international symposium on immunological, chemical and clinical problems of food allergy, Budapest, Hungary, 18–21 April 2004

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Dr. Enrico Scala (Department of Onco-Immuno-Dermatology, IDI-IRCCS, 00167 Rome, Italy) for helpful discussion and Dr. Paola A.M. Loguercio (Dipartimento di Biochimica e Biologia Molecolare, University of Bari, 70126 Bari, Italy) for immunological analyses.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maria De Angelis.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rizzello, C.G., De Angelis, M., Coda, R. et al. Use of selected sourdough lactic acid bacteria to hydrolyze wheat and rye proteins responsible for cereal allergy. Eur Food Res Technol 223, 405–411 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00217-005-0220-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00217-005-0220-x

Keywords

Navigation