Abstract
Social insect colonies, like individual organisms, must decide as they develop how to allocate optimally their resources among survival, growth, and reproduction. Only when colonies reach a certain state do they switch from investing purely in survival and growth to investing also in reproduction. But how do worker bees within a colony detect that their colony has reached the state where it is adaptive to begin investing in reproduction? Previous work has shown that larger honeybee colonies invest more in reproduction (i.e., the production of drones and queens), however, the term ‘larger’ encompasses multiple colony parameters including number of adult workers, size of the nest, amount of brood, and size of the honey stores. These colony parameters were independently increased in this study to test which one(s) would increase a colony’s investment in reproduction via males. This was assayed by measuring the construction of drone comb, the special type of comb in which drones are reared. Only an increase in the number of workers stimulated construction of drone comb. Colonies with over 4,000 workers began building drone comb, independent of the other colony parameters. These results show that attaining a critical number of workers is the key parameter for honeybee colonies to start to shift resources towards reproduction. These findings are relevant to other social systems in which a group’s members must adjust their behavior as a function of the group’s size.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Akaike H (1974) A new look at the statistical model identification. Autom Control IEEE Trans 19:716–723. doi:10.1109/TAC.1974.1100705
Alaux C, Jaisson P, Hefetz A (2005) Reproductive decision-making in semelparous colonies of the bumblebee Bombus terrestris. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 59:270–277. doi:10.1007/s00265-005-0035-6
Boes KE (2010) Honeybee colony drone production and maintenance in accordance with environmental factors: an interplay of queen and worker decisions. Insect Soc 57:1–9. doi:10.1007/s00040-009-0046-9
Brian MV (1957) The growth and development of colonies of the ant myrmica. Insect Soc 4:177–190
Chien AC, Hill NS, Levin PA (2012) Cell size control in bacteria. Curr Biol 22:R340–R349. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2012.02.032
Cole BJ, Wiernasz DC (2000) Colony size and reproduction in the western harvester ant, Pogonomyrmex occidentalis. Insect Soc 47:249–255. doi:10.1007/PL00001711
Free J, Williams I (1975) Factors determining the rearing and rejection of drones by the honeybee colony. Anim Behav 23:650–675
Gordon DM, Paul RE, Thorpe K (1993) What is the function of encounter patterns in ant colonies? Anim Behav 45:1083–1100. doi:10.1006/anbe.1993.1134
Grozinger CM, Richards J, Mattila HR (2013) From molecules to societies: mechanisms regulating swarming behavior in honey bees (Apis spp.). Apidologie 45:327–346. doi:10.1007/s13592-013-0253-2
Henderson CE (1991) Reproductive investment in drones in honey bee (Apis mellifera) colonies. Dissertation, Cornell University
Imdorf A, Buehlmann G, Gerig L et al (1987) Überprüfung der Schätzmethode zur Ermittlung der Brutfläche und der Anzahl Arbeiterinnen in freifliegenden Bienenvölkern. Apidologie 18:137–146
Jeanne RL, Bouwma AM (2002) Scaling in nests of a social wasp: a property of the social group. Biol Bull 202:289–295
Kozlowski J (1992) Optimal allocation of resources to growth and reproduction: implications for age and size at maturity. Trends Ecol Evol 7:15–19. doi:10.1016/0169-5347(92)90192-E
Lee P, Winston ML (1985) The effect of swarm size and date of issue on comb construction in newly founded colonies of honeybees (Apis mellifera L.). Can J Zool 63:524–527
Martin H, Lindauer M (1966) Sinnesphysiologische Leistungen beim Wabenbau der Honigbiene. Z Vergl Physiol 53:372–404
Michener CD (1964) Reproductive efficiency in relation to colony size in hymenopterous societies. Insect Soc 11:317–342
Mitchell C (1970) Weights of workers and drones. Am Bee J 110:468–469
Muller CB, Schmid-Hempel P (1992) Variation in life-history pattern in relation to worker mortality in the bumble-bee, Bombus lucorum. Funct Ecol 6:48–56
Otis GW (1982) Weights of worker honeybees in swarms. J Apic Res 21:88–92
Page RE (1981) Protandrous reproduction in honey bees. Environ Entomol 10:359–362
Pinter-Wollman N, Bala A, Merrell A et al (2013) Harvester ants use interactions to regulate forager activation and availability. Anim Behav 86:197–207. doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2013.05.012
Pomeroy N, Plowright R (1982) The relation between worker numbers and the production of males and queens in the bumble bee Bombus perplexus. Can J Zool 60:954–957
Pratt SC (1999) Optimal timing of comb construction by honeybee (Apis mellifera) colonies: a dynamic programming model and experimental tests. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 46:30–42. doi:10.1007/s002650050589
R Core Team (2012) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. http://cran.r-project.org/doc/FAQ/R-FAQ.html#Citing-R
Rangel J, Seeley TD (2012) Colony fissioning in honey bees: size and significance of the swarm fraction. Insect Soc 59:453–462. doi:10.1007/s00040-012-0239-5
Seeley TD (1989) The honey bee colony as a superorganism. Am Sci 77:546–553
Seeley TD, Tautz J (2001) Worker piping in honey bee swarms and its role in preparing for liftoff. J Comp Physiol A 187:667–676. doi:10.1007/s00359-001-0243-0
Starr CK (2006) Steps toward a general theory of the colony cycle in social insects. In: Kipyatkov VE (ed) Life cycles in social insects: behaviour, ecology and evolution. St. Petersburg University Press, St. Petersburg, pp 1–20
Taber S, Owens CD (1970) Colony founding and initial nest design of honey bees, Apis mellifera L. Anim Behav 18:625–632
Thummel CS (2001) Molecular mechanisms of developmental timing in C. elegans and Drosophila. Dev Cell 1:453–465
Tschinkel WR (1991) Insect sociometry, a field in search of data. Insect Soc 38:77–82. doi:10.1007/BF01242715
Tschinkel WR (1993) Sociometry and sociogenesis of colonies of the fire ant Solenopsis invicta during one annual cycle. Ecol Soc Am 63:425–457
Tschinkel WR (1998) Sociometry and sociogenesis of colonies of the harvester ant, Pogonomyrmex badius: worker characteristics in relation to colony size and season. Insect Soc 45:385–410. doi:10.1007/s000400050097
Tschinkel WR (2011) Back to basics: sociometry and sociogenesis of ant societies (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Myrmecol News 14:49–54
Turner JJ, Ewald JC, Skotheim JM (2012) Cell size control in yeast. Curr Biol 22:R350–R359. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2012.02.041
Webb M (1961) The biology of the bumblebees of a limited area in eastern Nebraska. University of Nebraska, Dissertation
Wilson EO (1985) The sociogenesis of insect colonies. Science 228:1489–1495
Acknowledgments
We thank Kevin Loope, Julie Miller, and Carmen Kelleher, for their critical readings of the manuscript, and Jason Barry (CSCU), for his statistical advice. This paper is based on work supported by a US National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship (to MLS) and by a Hatch Grant (2010-11-237) from the Cornell University Agriculture Experiment Station (to TDS).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Communicated by: Sven Thatje
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Smith, M.L., Ostwald, M.M., Loftus, J.C. et al. A critical number of workers in a honeybee colony triggers investment in reproduction. Naturwissenschaften 101, 783–790 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00114-014-1215-x
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00114-014-1215-x