Skip to main content
Log in

The evolutionary origins of patriarchy

  • Published:
Human Nature Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article argues that feminist analyses of patriarchy should be expanded to address the evolutionary basis of male motivation to control female sexuality. Evidence from other primates of male sexual coercion and female resistance to it indicates that the sexual conflicts of interest that underlie patriarchy predate the emergence of the human species. Humans, however, exhibit more extensive male dominance and male control of female sexuality than is shown by most other primates. Six hypotheses are proposed to explain how, over the course of human evolution, this unusual degree of gender inequality came about. This approach emphasizes behavioral flexibility, cross-cultural variability in the degree of partriarchy, and possibilities for future change.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abu-Lughod, L. 1986Veiled Sentiments: Honor and Poetry in a Bedouin Society. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, R. D. 1987The Biology of Moral Systems. Hawthorne, New York: Aldine de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, R. D., and G. Borgia 1979 On the Origin and Basis of the Male-Female Phenomenon. InSexual Selection and Reproductive Competition in Insects, M. S. Blum and N. A. Blum, eds. Pp. 417–440. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bailey, R. C., and R. Aunger 1989 Significance of the Social Relationships of Efe Pygmy Men in the Ituri Forest, Zaire.American Journal of Physical Anthropology 78:495–507.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnard, A. 1983 Contemporary Hunter-Gatherers: Current Issues in Ecology and Social Organization.Annual Review of Anthropology 12:193–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bateman, A. J. 1948 Intra-sexual Selection in Drosophila.Heredity 2:349–368.

    Google Scholar 

  • Betzig, L. 1986Despotism and Differential Reproduction: A Darwinian View of History. Hawthorne, New York: Aldine de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1992 Roman Polygyny.Ethology and Sociobiology 13:309–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 1993 Sex, Succession, and Stratification in the First Six Civilizations: How Powerful Men Reproduced, Passed Power on to Their Sons, and Used Power to Defend Their Wealth, Women, and Children. InSocioeconomic Stratification and Social Inequality, L. Ellis, ed. Pp. 37–74. New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borgia, G. 1979 Sexual Selection and the Evolution of Mating Systems. InSexual Selection and Reproductive Competition in Insects, M. S. Blum and N. A. Blum, eds. Pp. 18–80. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buss, D. 1989 Sex Differences in Human Mate Preferences: Evolutionary Hypotheses Tested in 37 Cultures.Behavioral and Brain Sciences 12:1–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 1994The Evolution of Desire. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chagnon, N. A. 1983Yanomamo: The Fierce People, 3rd ed. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapais, B. 1981The Adaptedness of Social Relationships among Adult Rhesus Monkeys. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Cambridge.

  • 1983 Adaptive Aspects of Social Relationships among Adult Rhesus Monkeys. InPrimate Social Relationships: An Integrated Approach, R. A. Hinde, ed. Pp. 171–175. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, G. 1988 Introduction. InTraders versus the State: Anthropological Approaches to Unofficial Economies, G. Clark, ed. Pp. 1–16. Boulder: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collier, J. F., and M. Z. Rosaldo 1981 Politics and Gender in Simple Societies. InSexual Meanings:The Cultural Construction of Gender and Sexuality, S. B. Ortner and H. Whitehead, eds. Pp. 275–329. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connor, R. C., R. A. Smolker, and A. F. Richards 1992 Two Levels of Alliance Formation among Male Bottlenose Dolphins (Tursiops sp.).Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 89:987–990.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, R. M., and J. P. Zubek 1958 Effects of Enriched and Restricted Early Environments on the Learning Ability of Bright and Dull Rats.Canadian Journal of Psychology 12:159–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Counts, D., J. K. Brown, and J. C. Campbell, eds. 1992Sanctions and Sanctuary: Cultural Perspectives on the Beating of Wives. Boulder: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronk, L. 1989 Low Socioeconomic Status and Female-biased Parental Investment: The Mukogodo Example.American Anthropologist 9:414–429.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daly, Martin, and Margo Wilson 1988Homicide. Hawthorne, New York: Aldine de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daly, Mary 1978GynEcology: The Metaethics of Radical Feminism. Boston: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darwin, C. 1859The Origin of Species. London: John Murray.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1871The Descent of Man, and Selection in Relation to Sex. London: John Murray.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawkins, R. 1982The Extended Phenotype. Oxford: W. H. Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Waal, F. B. M. 1982Chimpanzee Politics: Power and Sex among Apes. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickemann, M. 1979a Female Infanticide and the Reproductive Strategies of Stratified Human Societies: A Preliminary Model. InEvolutionary Biology and Human Social Behavior: An Anthropological Perspective, N. A. Chagnon and W. Irons, eds. Pp. 321–367. North Scituate, Massachusetts: Duxbury Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1979b The Ecology of Mating Systems in Hypergynous Dowry Societies.Social Science Information 18:163–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 1981 Paternal Confidence and Dowry Competition: A Biocultural Analysis of Purdah. InNatural Selection and Social Behavior: Recent Research and New Theory, R. D. Alexander and D. W. Tinkle, eds. Pp. 439–475. New York: Chiron Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Draper, P., and H. Harpending 1988 A Sociobiological Perspective on the Development of Human Reproductive Strategies. InSociobiological Perspectives on Human Development, K. MacDonald, ed. Pp. 340–372. New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ember, C. R. 1978 Myths about Hunter-gatherers.Ethnology 17:439–448.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emlen, S. T., and L. W. Oring 1977 Ecology, Sexual Selection, and the Evolution of Mating Systems.Science 197:215–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Estrich, S. 1987Real Rape. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foley, R. A. 1989 The Evolution of Hominid Social Behavior. InComparative Socioecology, V. Standen and R. A. Foley, eds. Pp. 473–494. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedl, E. 1975Women and Men: An Anthropologist’s View. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gelber, M. G. 1986Gender and Society in the New Guinea Highlands: An Anthropological Perspective on Antagonism toward Women. Boulder: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghiglieri, M. 1989 Hominoid Sociobiology and Hominid Social Evolution. InUnderstanding Chimpanzees, P. G. Heltne and L. A. Marquardt, eds. Pp. 370–379. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodall, J. 1986The Chimpanzees of Gombe: Patterns of Behavior. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottlieb, G. 1992Individual Development and Evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gowaty, P. A. 1992 Evolutionary Biology and Feminism.Human Nature 3:217–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenwood, P. J. 1980 Mating Systems, Philopatry, and Dispersal in Birds and Mammals.Animal Behaviour 28:1140–1162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gregor, T. 1990 Male Dominance and Sexual Coercion. InCultural Psychology, J. W. Stegler, R. A. Shweder, and G. Herdt, eds. Pp. 477–495. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammerstein, P., and G. A. Parker 1987 Sexual Selection: Games between the Sexes. InSexual Selection: Testing the Alternatives, J. W. Bradbury and M. B. Andersson, eds. Pp. 119–142. New York: John Wiley and Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartung, J. 1982 Polygyny and the Inheritance of Wealth.Current Anthropology 23:1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hasegawa, T., and M. Hiraiwa-Hasegawa 1983 Opportunistic and Restrictive Matings among Wild Chimpanzees in the Mahale Mountains, Tanzania.Journal of Ethology 1:75–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hausfater, G., and S. B. Hrdy, eds. 1984Infanticide: Comparative and Evolutionary Perspectives. Hawthorne, New York: Aldine de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hewlett, B. 1991Intimate Fathers: The Nature and Context of Aka Pygmy Paternal Infant Care. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, K. 1982 Hunting and Human Evolution.Journal of Human Evolution 11:521–544.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hrdy, S. B. 1981The Woman That Never Evolved. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1990 Sex Bias in Nature and in History: A Late 1980s Reexamination of the “Biological Origins” Argument.Yearbook of Physical Anthropology 33:25–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Irons, W. 1979 Investment and Primary Social Dyads. InEvolutionary Biology and Human Social Behavior: An Anthropological Perspective, N. A. Chagnon and W. Irons, eds. Pp. 181–213. North Scituate, Massachusetts: Duxbury Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1983 Human Female Reproductive Strategies. InSocial Behavior of Female Vertebrates, S. Wasser, ed. Pp. 169–213. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeffrey, P. 1979Frogs in a Well: Indian Women in Purdah. Flushing, New York: Asia Book Corporation of America.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kano, T. 1992The Last Ape: Pygmy Chimpanzee Behavior and Ecology. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keddy, A. C. 1986 Female Mate Choice in Vervet Monkeys (Cercopithecus aethiops sabaeus).American Journal of Primatology 10:125–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knauft, B. M. 1991 Violence and Sociality in Human Evolution.Current Anthropology 32:391–428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koss, M. P., C. A. Gidycz, and N. Wisniewski 1987 The Scope of Rape: Incidence and Prevalence of Sexual Aggression and Victimization in a National Sample of Higher Education Students.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 55:162–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kummer, H. 1968Social Organization of Hamadryas Baboons. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1975 “Adaptation of Female Anubis Baboons to Social System of Hamadryas Baboons,” H. Kummer, Director. Film available through University Park, Pennsylvania: Pennsylvania State University, Audio Visual Services.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuroda, S. 1979 Grouping of the Pygmy Chimpanzees.Primates 20:161–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lateef, S. 1990 Rule by the Danda: Domestic Violence among Indo-Fijians.Pacific Studies 13:43–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lerner, G. 1986The Creation of Patriarchy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levi-Strauss, C. 1969The Elementary Structures of Kinship. Boston: Beacon Press. (originally published in 1949)

    Google Scholar 

  • Levinson, D. 1989Family Violence in Cross-Cultural Perspective. Newbury Park, California: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacKinnon, C. 1987Feminism Unmodified. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manson, J. 1994 Male Aggression: A Cost of Female Mate Choice in Cayo Santiago Rhesus Macaques.Animal Behaviour 48:473–475.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitani, J. C. 1985 Mating Behavior of Male Orangutans in the Kutai Reserve.Animal Behaviour 33:392–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murdock, G. P. 1967Ethnographic Atlas. Pittsburgh: Pittsburgh University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, Y., and R. F. Murphy 1985Women of the Forest, 2nd ed. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nishida, T. 1983 Alpha Status and Agonistic Alliance in Wild Chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes schweinfurthii).Primates 24:318–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nishida, T., and M. Hiraiwa-Hasegawa 1987 Chimpanzees and Bonobos: Relationships among Males. InPrimate Societies, B. B. Smuts, D. L. Cheney, R. M. Seyfarth, R. W. Wrangham, and T. T. Struhsaker, eds. Pp. 165–177. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nishida, T., M. Hiraiwa-Hasegawa, T. Hasegawa, and Y. Takahata 1985 Group Extinction and Female Transfer in Wild Chimpanzees in the Mahale Mountains.Zeitschrift Tierpsychologie 67:284–301.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ortner, S. B. 1981 Gender and Sexuality in Hierarchical Societies: The Case of Polynesia and Some Comparative Implications. InSexual Meanings: The Cultural Construction of Gender and Sexuality, S. B. Ortner and H. Whitehead, eds. Pp. 359–409. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ortner, S. B. and H. Whitehead 1981 Introduction: Accounting for Sexual Meanings. InSexual Meanings: The Cultural Construction of Gender and Sexuality, S. B. Ortner and H. Whitehead, eds. Pp. 1–27. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oyama, S. 1985The Ontogeny of Information: Developmental Systems and Evolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Packer, C., and A. E. Pusey 1983 Adaptations of Female Lions to Infanticide by Incoming Males.American Naturalist 121:716–728.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paige, K. E., and J. M. Paige 1981The Politics of Reproductive Ritual. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, G. A. 1979 Sexual Selection and Sexual Conflict. InSexual Selection and Reproductive Competition, M. S. Blum and N. A. Blum, eds. Pp. 123–166. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pusey, A. E., and C. Packer 1987 Dispersal and Philopatry. InPrimate Societies, B. B. Smuts, D. L. Cheney, R. M. Seyfarth, R. W. Wrangham, and T. T. Struhsaker, eds. Pp. 250–266. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raleigh, M. J., and M. J. McGuire 1989 Female Influences on Male Dominance Acquisition in Captive Vervet Monkeys,Cercopithecus aethiops sabaeus.Animal Behavior 38:59–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ransom, T. W. 1981Beach Troop of the Gombe. Lewisburg, Pennsylvania: Bucknell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodman, P. S., and J. C. Mitani 1987 Orangutans: Sexual Dimorphism in a Solitary Species. InPrimate Societies, B. B. Smuts, D. L. Cheney, R. M. Seyfarth, R. W. Wrangham, and T. T. Struhsaker, eds. Pp. 146–154. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodseth, L. T. 1990 Prestige, Hunger, and Love: Plumbing the Psychology of Sexual Meanings.Michigan Discussions in Anthropology 9:107–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1991 Comment on Bruce M. Knauft, “Violence and Sociality in Human Evolution.”Current Anthropology 32:414–416.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodseth, L. T., B. B. Smuts, A. M. Harrigan, and R. W. Wrangham 1991 On “The Human Community as a Primate Society”: Reply to Comments.Current Anthropology 32:429–433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodseth, L. T., R. W. Wrangham, A. M. Harrigan, and B. B. Smuts 1991 The Human Community as a Primate Society.Current Anthropology 32:221–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, G. 1975 The Traffic in Women: Notes on the “Political Economy” of Sex. InToward an Anthropology of Women, R. R. Reiter, ed. Pp. 157–210. New York: Monthly Review Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sacks, K. 1975 Engels Revisited: Women, the Organization of Production, and Private Property. InToward an Anthropology of Women, R. R. Reiter, ed. Pp. 211–234. New York: Monthly Review Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlegel, A., and H. Barry 1986 The Cultural Consequences of Female Contributions to Subsistence.American Anthropologist 88:142–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smuts, B. B. 1985Sex and Friendship in Baboons. Hawthorne, New York: Aldine de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1987 Gender, Aggression, and Influence. InPrimate Societies, B. B. Smuts, D. L. Cheney, R. M. Seyfarth, R. W. Wrangham, and T. T. Struhsaker, eds. Pp. 400–412. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1992 Male Aggression against Women: An Evolutionary Perspective.Human Nature 3:1–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smuts, B. B., and D. J. Gubernick 1992 Male-infant Relationships in Nonhuman Primates: Paternal Investment or Mating Effort? InFather-Child Relations: Cultural and Biosocial Concepts, B. Hewlett, ed., Pp. 1–30. Hawthorne, New York: Aldine de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smuts, B. B., and R. W. Smuts 1993 Male Aggression and Sexual Coercion of Females in Nonhuman Primates and Other Mammals: Evidence and Theoretical Implications. InAdvances in the Study of Behavior, Vol. 22., P. J. B. Slater, J. S. Rosenblatt, M. Milinski, and C. T. Snowdon, eds. Pp. 1–63. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stammbach, E. 1987 Desert, Forest, and Montane Baboons: Multilevel Societies. InPrimate Societies, B. B. Smuts, D. L. Cheney, R. M. Seyfarth, R. W. Wrangham, and T. T. Struhsaker, eds. Pp. 112–120. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, K. J., and A. H. Harcourt 1987 Gorillas: Variation in Female Relationships. InPrimate Societies, B. B. Smuts, D. L. Cheney, R. M. Seyfarth, R. W. Wrangham, and T. T. Struhsaker, eds. Pp. 155–164. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strassman, B. I. 1981 Sexual Selection, Paternal Care, and Concealed Ovulation in Humans.Ethology and Sociobiology 2:31–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strier, K. B. 1992 Causes and Consequences on Nonaggression among the Woolly Spider Monkey or Muriqui (Brachyteles arachnoides). InAggression and Peacefulness in Humans and Other Primates, J. Silverberg and J. P. Gray, eds. Pp. 110–116. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Struhsaker, T. T., and L. Leland 1987 Colobines: Infanticide by Adult Males. InPrimate Societies, B. B. Smuts, D. L. Cheney, R. M. Seyfarth, R. W. Wrangham, and T. T. Struhsaker, eds. Pp. 83–97. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teleki, G. 1981 The Omnivorous Diet and Eclectic Feeding Habits of Chimpanzees in Gombe National Park, Tanzania. InOmnivorous Primates, R. S. O. Harding and G. Teleki, eds. Pp. 303–343. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trivers, R. L. 1972 Parental Investment and Sexual Selection. InSexual Selection and the Descent of Man 1871–1971, B. Campbell, ed. Pp. 136–179. Chicago: Aldine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trivers, R. L., and D. Willard 1973 Natural Selection of Parental Ability to Vary the Sex Ratio of Offspring.Science 179:90–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tryon, R. 1942 Individual Differences. InComparative Psychology, F. A. Moss, ed. Pp. 409–448. New York: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tutin, C. E. G. 1979 Mating Patterns and Reproductive Strategies in a Community of Wild Chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes schweinfurthii).Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 6:39–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watts, D. P. 1989 Infanticide in Mountain Gorillas: New Cases and a Reconsideration of the Evidence.Ethology 81:1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • West-Eberhard, M. J. 1987 Flexible Strategy and Evolution. InAnimal Societies: Theories and Facts, Y. Ito, J. L. Brown, and J. Kikkawa, eds. Pp. 35–51. Tokyo: Japan Science Society Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, F. J., and M. A. Burgman 1990Pan paniscus Social Organization: Multivariate Analysis of Intracommunity Associations.American Journal of Physical Anthropology 83:193–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, M., and M. Daly 1993 An Evolutionary Psychological Perspective on Male Sexual Proprietariness and Violence against Wives.Violence and Victims 8:271–294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wrangham, R. W. 1979 On the Evolution of Ape Social Systems.Social Science Information 18:334–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 1980 An Ecological Model of Female-bonded Groups.Behaviour 75:262–300.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1987 The Significance of African Apes for Reconstructing Human Social Evolution. InThe Evolution of Human Behavior: Primate Models, W. P. Kinzey, ed. Pp. 51–71. Albany: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wrangham, R. W., and B. B. Smuts 1980 Sex Differences in the Behavioral Ecology of Chimpanzees in the Gombe National Park, Tanzania.Journal of Reproduction and Fertility, Supplement 28:13–31.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This work was supported in part by NSF grant BNS-8857969.

Barbara Smuts is a professor of psychology and anthropology at the University of Michigan. She received her B.A. in social anthropology at Harvard and her Ph.D. in bio-behavioral sciences at Stanford Medical School. She has studied the behavior of wild chimpanzees, baboons, and bottlenose dolphins and is particularly interested in evolutionary, comparative analyses of female-male relationships.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Smuts, B. The evolutionary origins of patriarchy. Human Nature 6, 1–32 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02734133

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02734133

Key words

Navigation