Abstract
Evolutionary biology and feminism share a variety of philosophical and practical concerns. I have tried to describe how a perspective from both evolutionary biology and feminism can accelerate the achievement of goals for both feminists and evolutionary biologists. In an early section of this paper I discuss the importance of variation to the disciplines of evolutionary biology and feminism. In the section entitled “Control of Female Reproduction” I demonstrate how insight provided by participation in life as woman and also as a feminist suggests testable hypotheses about the evolution of social behavior—hypotheses that are applicable to our investigations of the evolution of social behavior in nonhuman animals. In the section on “Deceit, Self-deception, and Patriarchal Reversals” I have overtly conceded that evolutionary biology, a scientific discipline, also represents a human cultural practice that, like other human cultural practices, may in parts and at times be characterized by deceit and self-deception. In the section on “Femininity” I have indicated how questions cast and answered and hypotheses tested from an evolutionary perspective can serve women and men struggling with sexist oppression.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Atwood, Margaret 1986The Handmaids Tale. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Bleier, Ruth 1979 Social and Political Bias in Science: An Examination of Animal Studies and Their Generalizations to Human Behavior and Evolution. InGenes and Gender II: Pitfalls in Research on Sex and Gender, Ruth Hubbard and Marian Lowe, eds. Pp. 49–70. Staten Island: Gordian Press.
Borgia, G. 1979 Sexual Selection and the Evolution of Mating Systems. InSexual Selection and Reproductive Competition in Insects. M. S. Blum and N. A. Blum, eds. Pp. 19–80. New York: Academic Press.
Brownmiller, Susan 1975Against Our Will: Men, Women, and Rape. New York: Simon and Schuster.
1984Femininity. New York: Simon and Schuster.
Burley, Nancy 1986 Sex-ratio Manipulation in Color-banded Populations of Zebra Finches.Evolution 40:1191–1206.
Chapkis, Wendy 1987Beauty Secrets: Women and the Politics of Appearance. Boston: South End Press.
Corea, Gena 1985The Mother Machine: Reproductive Technologies from Artificial Insemination to Artificial Wombs. New York: Harper & Row.
Daly, Martin, Margo Wilson, and S. J. Weghorst 1982 Male Sexual Jealousy.Ethology and Sociobiology 3:11–27.
Daly, Mary 1975Beyond God the Father. Boston: Beacon Press.
1978Gyn/Ecology: The Metaethics of Radical Feminism. Boston: Beacon Press.
Daly, Mary, and Jane Caputi 1987Websters’ First New Intergalactic Wickedary of the English Language. Boston: Beacon Press.
Darwin, Charles 1859The Origin of Species. London: Murray.
1871The Descent of Man, and Selection in Relation to Sex. New York: Appleton.
1915The Expression of the Emotions in Man and Animals. New York: Appleton.
Dickemann, Mildred 1979a Female Infanticide, Reproductive Strategies and Social Stratification: A Preliminary Model. InEvolutionary Biology and Human Social Behavior: An Anthropological Perspective, Napoleon Chagnon and William Irons, eds. Pp. 321–367. Boston: Duxbury Press.
1979b The Ecology of Mating Systems in Hypergynous Dowry Societies.Social Science Information 18(2):163–195.
1981 Paternal Confidence and Dowry Competition: A Biocultural Analysis of Purdah. InNatural Selection and Social Behavior, R. D. Alexander and D. W. Tinkle, eds. Pp. 417–438. New York: Cheron Press.
Dobzhansky, T. 1973 Nothing in Biology Makes Sense Except in the Light of Evolution.American Biology Teacher 35:125–129.
Frieze, Irene Hanson 1983 Investigating the Causes and Consequences of Marital Rape.Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 8:532–553.
Gould, Stephen Jay 1977Ontogeny and Phylogeny. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
1979 Mickey Mouse Meets Konrad Lorenz.Natural History 5:30–36.
Gowaty, Patricia A. 1992 The Battles of the Sexes and the Evolution of Mating Systems in Birds and Mammals. Manuscript. Department of Biological Sciences, Clemson University, Clemson, South Carolina.
Harding, Sandra 1986The Science Question in Feminism. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Haraway, Donna 1989Primate Visions: Gender, Race, and Nature in the Natural World of Modern Science. New York: Routledge.
Hite, Shere 1987The Hite Report: Women and Love—A Cultural Revolution in Progress. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
Hooks, Bell 1984Feminist Theory: From Margin to Center. Boston: South End Press.
1989Talking Back: Thinking Feminist—Thinking Black. Boston: South End Press.
Hrdy, Sarah Blaffer 1981The Woman That Never Evolved. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
1986 Empathy, Polyandry, and the Myth of the Coy Female. InFeminist Approaches to Science, Ruth Bleier, ed. Pp. 119–146. New York: Pergamon Press.
Hubbard, Ruth 1990The Politics of Women’s Biology. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.
Huxley, Julian S. 1938 The Present Standing of the Theory of Sexual Selection. InEvolution, G. DeBeer, ed. Pp 11–42. New York: Oxford University Press.
Jaggar, Alison M. 1983Feminist Politics and Human Nature. Totowa, New Jersey: Rowman and Allanheld Press.
Johnston, Allan Griswold 1980 On the Prevalence of Rape in the United States.Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 6:136–146.
Kirkpatrick, Mark, and Michael J. Ryan 1991 The Evolution of Mating Preferences and the Paradox of the Lek.Nature 350:33–38.
Kitcher, Philip 1985Vaulting Ambition: Sociobiology and the Quest for Human Nature. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Krebs, J. R., and R. Dawkins 1984 Animal Signals: Mind-reading and Manipulation. InBehavioural Ecology: An Evolutionary Approach, second ed., J. R. Krebs and N. B. Davies, eds. Pp. 380–402. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific.
Lancaster, Jane B. 1989 Evolutionary and Cross-cultural Perspectives on Single-parenthood. InSociobiology and the Social Sciences, R. W. Bell and N. J. Bell, eds. Pp. 63–72. Lubbock: Texas Tech University Press.
Lancaster, Jane B., and Hillard Kaplan 1991 Human Mating and Family Formation Strategies: The Effects of Variability among Males in Quality and the Allocation of Mating Effort and Parental Investment. InPrimatology Today, A. Ehara, T. Kimura, O. Takenaka, and M. Iwamoto, eds. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Lerner, Gerda 1986The Creation of Patriarchy. New York: Oxford University Press.
Lowe, Marion, and Ruth Hubbard 1979 Sociobiology and Biosociology: Can Science Prove the Biological Basis of Sex Differences in Behavior? InGenes and Gender II: Pitfalls in Research on Sex and Gender, Ruth Hubbard and Marian Lowe, eds. Pp. 91–112. Staten Island: Gordian Press.
MacKinnon, Catharine A. 1982 Feminism, Marxism, Method, and the State: An Agenda for Theory.Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society. 7:544–575.
1987Feminism Unmodified: Discourses on Life and Law. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Maynard Smith, J. 1977 Parental Investment—A Prospective Analysis.Animal Behaviour 25:1–9.
Mayr, Ernst 1982The Growth of Biological Thought: Diversity, Evolution, and Inheritance. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Offen, Karen 1988 Defining Feminism: A Comparative Historical Approach.Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 14:119–157.
Penelope, Julia 1990Speaking Freely: Unlearning the Lies of the Fathers’ Tongues. New York: Pergamon Press.
Prigogine, Ilya 1980From Being to Becoming: Time and Complexity in the Physical Sciences. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.
Russell, Diana E. H., and Nancy Howell 1983 The Prevalence of Rape in the United States Revisited.Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 8:688–695.
Smuts, Barbara 1991 The Origins of Gender Inequality: An Evolutionary Perspective. InThe Foundations of Gender Inequality, A. Zagarell, ed. Kalamazoo: Western Michigan University Press (submitted).
Smuts, Barbara, and Robert Smuts 1992 Male Aggression against Female Primates: Evidence and Theoretical Implications. InAdvances in the Study of Behavior, P. J. B. Slater, J. S. Rosenblatt, M. Milinski, and C. T. Snowdon, eds. New York: Academic Press (submitted).
Smuts, Robert 1989 Behavior Depends on Context. Commentary on D. M. Buss, Sex Differences in Human Mate Preferences: Evolutionary Hypotheses Tested in 37 Cultures.Behavioral and Brain Sciences 12:1–49.
Spender, Dale 1982Women of Ideas and What Men Have Done to Them: From Aphra Behn to Adrienne Rich. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Thornhill, Randy 1980 Rape inPanorpa Scorpionflies and a General Rape Hypothesis.Animal Behaviour 28:52–59.
Thornhill, Randy, and Nancy Thornhill 1991 The Evolutionary Psychology of Men’s Coercive Sexuality.Behavioral and Brain Sciences, in press.
Trivers, Robert 1972 Parental Investment and Sexual Selection. InSexual Selection and the Descent of Man 1871–1971, B. Campbell, ed. Pp. 136–179. Chicago: Aldine.
1985Social Evolution. Menlo Park, California: Benjamin Cummings.
Tuana, Nancy, ed. 1989Feminism and Science. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Wade, M. J., and S. J. Arnold 1980 The Intensity of Sexual Selection in Relation to Male Sexual Behaviour, Female Choice, and Sperm Precedence.Animal Behaviour 28:446–461.
Walker, Alice 1983In Search of Our Mothers’ Gardens: Womanist Prose. San Diego: Harcourt, Brace Jovanovich.
1989The Temple of My Familiar. San Diego: Harcourt, Brace Jovanovich.
Williams, George C. 1966Adaptation and Natural Selection: A Critique of Some Current Evolutionary Thought. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
Wilson, Edward O. 1975Sociobiology: The New Synthesis. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Wolf, Naomi 1991The Beauty Myth: How Images of Beauty Are Used against Women. New York: William Morrow.
Woolf, Virginia 1938Three Guineas. New York: Harcourt Brace and World.
Zahavi, Amotz 1975 Mate Selection—A Selection for a Handicap.Journal of Theoretical Biology 67:603–605.
Zuk, Marlene, Kristeen Johnson, Randy Thornhill, and J. David Ligon 1990 Mechanisms of Female Choice in Red Jungle Fowl.Evolution 44:477–485.
Zuk, Marlene, Randy Thornhill, J. David Ligon, Kristeen Johnson, Steve Austad, Sandra H. Ligon, Nancy W. Thornhill, and C. Costin 1990 The Role of Male Ornaments and Courtship Behavior in Female Mate Choice of Red Jungle Fowl.American Naturalist 136:459–473.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Patricia Adair Gowaty studies the evolution of social behavior, particularly mating systems and sex allocation, primarily in birds. She is most well-known for her long-term studies of eastern bluebirds, which began in 1977 and are on-going. She was an undergraduate at H. Sophie Newcomb College of Tulane University (1963–1967). In the late sixties and early seventies, while employed at the Bronx Zoo (New York Zoological Society), she belonged to a feminist “consciousness-raising” group. She started graduate school in 1974 at the University of Georgia and received her Ph.D. from Clemson University (1980). She had a postdoctoral position at the University of Oklahoma (1982–1983) and a visiting faculty position at Cornell University through the Visiting Professorships for Women NSF program (1983–1984) before returning to her bluebird study sites at Clemson in 1985. She has supported herself and her research efforts throughout her academic career on a series of awards and grants. She is currently (1990–1995) supported by a Research Scientist Development Award from The National Institute of Mental Health.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gowaty, P.A. Evolutionary biology and feminism. Human Nature 3, 217–249 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02692240
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02692240