Skip to main content
Log in

Electrodermal fluctuation as a function of verbal incentive

  • Articles
  • Published:
Current Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study was to determine if verbal incentive is an effective variable in the development of the control of electrodermal fluctuations (EDFs); and if body movement and respiratory artifacts are confounding variables in the feedback control of EDFs. Nonlabiles encouraged to increase EDFs by “thinking emotional thoughts” demonstrated significant increases in both EDFs and body movement and respiratory artifacts. However, persons with few, if any, artifacts showed an almost identical pattern of EDFs as compared to persons with relatively more artifacts in their recordings. Incentive as compared to control groups reported an increased ability to sustain their thinking about emotional events. All groups indicated decreased anxiety from pre- to post-feedback conditions. The findings were related to contemporary theory on cognition.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baumeister, R.F. (1990). Suicide as escape from self. Psychological Review, 97, 90–113.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fowles, D.C., Christie, M.J., Edelberg, R, Grings, W.W., Lykken, D.T., & Venables, P.H. (1981). Publication recommendations for electrodermal measurements.Psychophysiology, 18, 232–239.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fehr, F.S. (1970). A simple method for assessing body movement and potential artifacts in the physiological recordings of young children.Psychophysiology, 6, 787–789.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gavalas, R.J. (1968). Operant reinforcement of a skeletally mediated autonomic response: Uncoupling of the two responses.Psychonomic Science, 11, 195–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grings, W.W. (1973) Cognitive factors in electrodermal conditioning.Psychological Review, 79, 200–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klinge, V. (1972). Effects of exteroceptive feedback and instructions on control of spontaneous galvanic skin response.Psychophysiology, 9, 305–317.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lazarus, R.S. (1984). The trivialization of stress. In B.L. Hammonds & C.J. Scheirer (Eds.),Psychology and health, (pp. 125–144). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Litt, M.D. (1988). Cognitive mediators of stressful experience: Self-efficacy and perceived control.Cognitive therapy and Research, 12, 241–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norusis, M.J. (1988).Spss/pc+advanced statistics V3.1, (pp. C76–82). Chicago, IL: Spss inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pennebaker, J.W. (1989). Stream of consciousness and stress: Levels of thinking. In J.S. Uleman & J. A. Bargh (Eds.),Unintended thought, (pp. 327–350). NY: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, D. (1977). A monologue on biofeedback and psychophysiology.Psychophysiology, 14, 213–227.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, D., Crider, A.B., & Tursky, B. (1964). Differentiation of an autonomic response through operant reinforcement.Psychonomic Science, 1, 147–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stern, R.M. & Kaplan, B.E. (1967). Galvanic skin response: Voluntary control and externalization.Journal c c Psychosomatic Research,10, 349–353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wegner, D.M. & Schneider D.J. (1989). Mental control: The war of the ghosts in the machine. In J.S. Uleman and J.A. Bargh (Eds.),Unintended thought, (pp. 287–305). NY: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, K.G. & Graham, R.S. (1989). Electrodermal lability and visual information processing.Psychophysiology, 26, 321–328.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zuckerman, M, & Lubin, B. (1965).Manual for the multiple affect adjective check list. San Diego, CA: Educational and Industrial testing Service.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

The present manuscript is based upon a poster presentation at the American Psychological Society Meetings, July 7, 1990. I wish to express my appreciation to John and Carolyn Stern of Washington University, St. Louis, for their kindness and contagious enthusiasm for research.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fehr, F.S., O’Neil, E. Electrodermal fluctuation as a function of verbal incentive. Current Psychology 11, 254–263 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02686845

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02686845

Keywords

Navigation