Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The efficacy of intensive biopsychosocial teaching programs for residents

A review of the literature and guidelines for teaching

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Journal of General Internal Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective: To review research evaluations of intensive biopsychosocial training programs for nonpsychiatry residents, and determine whether this research showed sufficient rigor and consistent beneficial impact to allow initial research-based teaching guidelines.

Data sources: An English-language literature search used MEDLINE (1966–93), Psychological Abstracts (1967–93), and Educational Resource Information Clearinghouse (1966–93) as well as bibliographic reviews from prominent peer-reviewed articles and consultation with an expert.

Study selection: From among several hundred articles about biopsychosocial training, only 12 studies met the selection criteria: at least 100 contact hours of training for nonpsychiatry residents and an evaluation of efficacy.

Data extraction: The three authors independently assessed these 12 studies and made a consensus decision based on explicit criteria. Successful and unsuccessful programs were distinguished from among those classified as quasi-experimental or experimental to identify programs of sufficient rigor to meet the study objective; success was defined as learning beyond knowledge and residents’ acceptance of teaching.

Data synthesis: Four successful quasi-experimental or experimental programs showed the following uniquely beneficial features: 1) protected time for residents; 2) teaching that was required, structured, multidimensional, and balanced between learner-centered and teacher-centered approaches; 3) teaching methods that used normal as well as psychosocially disturbed patients, nonpsychiatrist teachers, and special teaching techniques; and 4) inclusion in the curriculum of interviewing, interpersonal skills, doctor-patient relationship, and patient education. Two unsuccessful quasi-experimental or experimental programs were unidimensional and unstructured, and used predominant or isolated teacher-centered approaches. Features found in both successful and unsuccessful programs were experiential teaching, psychiatrist and other mental health professional teachers, use of disturbed patients, training to manage patients’ psychosocial problems, teaching directed toward knowledge acquisition, teaching about treatment, and university affiliation.

Conclusions: Four rigorously studied, successful programs showed a common pattern of intensive biopsychosocial teaching that produced, in aggregate, improvement in residents’ knowledge, attitudes, skills, and self-awareness. Although there is need for more definitive research, these data are sufficiently compelling and consistent to provide initial, research-based teaching guidelines.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Engel GL. The clinical application of the biopsychosocial model. Am J Psychiatry. 1980;137:535–44.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Engel GL. The need for a new medical model: a challenge for biomedicine. Science. 1977;196:129–36.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. American Board of Internal Medicine. Evaluation of humanistic qualities in the internist. Ann Intern Med. 1983;99:720–4.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Commission on Education. Education for Family Practice. Reprint No. B-1600. Kansas City, MO: American Academy of Family Physicians, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Task Force on Pediatric Education. The Future of Pediatric Education, Evanston, IL: American Academy of Pediatrics, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Merkel WT, Margolis RB, Smith RC. Teaching humanistic and psychosocial aspects of care: current practices and attitudes. J Gen Intern Med. 1990;5:34–41.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Kern DE, Grayson M, Barker LR, et al. Residency training in interviewing skills and the psychosocial domain of medical practice. J Gen Intern Med. 1989;4:421–31.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Smith RC, Osborn G, Hoppe RB, et al. Efficacy of a one-month training block in psychosocial medicine for residents: a controlled study. J Gen Intern Med. 1991;6:535–43.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Strain JJ, Pincus HA, Houpt HL, Gise LH, Taintor Z. Models of mental health training for primary care physicians. Psychosom Med. 1985;47:95–110.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Novack DH, Goldberg RJ, Rowland-Morin P, Landau C, Wartman SA. Toward a comprehensive psychiatry/behavioral science curriculum for primary care residents. Psychosomatics. 1989;30:231–23.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Williamson PR, Smith RC, Kern DE, et al. The medical interview and psychosocial aspects of medicine: block curricula for residents. J Gen Intern Med. 1992;7:235–42.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Cohen-Cole SA, Bird J, Boker J, et al. Psychiatric education for internists: a randomized, controlled comparison of two teaching models [abstract]. Psychosom Med. 1982;44:122.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Roter DL, Cole KA, Kern DE, Barker LR, Grayson MA. An evaluation of residency training in interviewing skills and the psychosocial domain of medical practice. J Gen Intern Med. 1990;5:347–54.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Markel WT, Nierenberg BP. Behavioral science training in family practice residency education: a first evaluation. Soc Sci Med. 1983;17:213–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Cohen-Cole SA. Training outcome in liaison psychiatry: literature review and methodological proposals. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 1980;2:282–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Bird J, Cohen-Cole SA, Boker J, Freeman A. Teaching psychiatry to non-psychiatrists: I. The application of educational methodology. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 1983;5:247–53.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. McKegney PF, Beckhardt RM. Evaluation research in consultation-liaison psychiatry. Review of the literature: 1970–1981. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 1982;4:197–218.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Houpt JL, Weinstein HM, Russell ML. The application of competency-based education to consultation-liaison psychiatry. Int J Psychiatry Med. 1976;7:295–328.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Houpt JL. Evaluating liaison program effectiveness: the use of unobtrusive measurement. Int J Psychiatry Med. 1977;8:361–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Houpt JL, Trent PJ, Orleans CS. Models for evaluating teaching in consultation-liaison psychiatry. II. Decision-oriented research. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 1979;1:220–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Orleans CS, Houpt JL, Trent PJ. Models for evaluating teaching in consultation-liaison psychiatry. III. Conclusion-oriented research. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 1979;1:322–30.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Rogers DR. Freedom to Learn for the 80’s. Columbus, OH: Merrill, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Engel GL, Green WL, Reichsman F, Schmale A, Ashenburg N. A graduate and undergraduate teaching program on the psychological aspects of medicine: a report on the liaison program between medicine and psychiatry at the University of Rochester School of Medicine. J Med Educ. 1957;32:859–71.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Knowles MS. The Modern Practice of Adult Education: From Pedagogy to Andragogy. New York: Cambridge, The Adult Education Company, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Burns BJ, Scot JE, Burke JD, Kessler JD. Mental health training of primary care residents: a review of recent literature (1974–1981). Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 1983;5:157–69.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Carroll JG, Monroe J. Teaching medical interviewing. A critique of educational research and practice. J Med Educ. 1979;54:498–500.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Smith RC, Hoppe RB. The patient’s story—a patient-centered approach. Ann Intern Med. 1991;115:470–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Greenhill MH, Kilgore SR. Principles of methodology in teaching the psychiatric approach to medical house officers. Psychosom Med. 1950;12:38–48.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Bank RL, Bissell WG, Ellien WB, Hester TW. Psychiatric education for family practice residents. Psychosomatics. 1984;25:401–10.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Agbayewa MB, Leichner PP. Effects of a psychiatric rotation on psychiatric knowledge and attitudes towards psychiatry in rotating items. Can J Psychiatry. 1985;30:602–4.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Brown JT, Harris RT. The medical-psychiatric unit and psychosocial education of internists. Psychosomatics. 1985;26:321–38.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Hickson L, Mann EM. The relationship between attitudinal and behavioral change in pediatric residents in a psychiatric liaison teaching program: a pilot study. Int J Psychiatry Med. 1985;15:61–73.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Jones RL, Badger LW, Ficken RP, Leeper JD, Anderson RL. Mental health training of primary care physicians: an outcome study. Int J Psychiatry Med. 1988;18:107–21.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Thompson TL, Stoudemire A, Mitchell WD. Effects of a psychiatric liaison program on internists’ ability to assess psychosocial problems. Int J Psychiatry Med. 1982;12:153–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Schubert DSP, Billowitz A, Gabinet L, Friedson W. Effect of liaison psychiatry on attitudes toward psychiatry, rate of consultation, and psychosocial documentation. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 1989;11:77–87.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Breunlin DC, Richman JS, Lattimer A. An evaluation strategy for behavioral pediatrics training. Fam Systems Med. 1991;8:48–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Smith RC, Alguire P, Henry R, Osborn G, Stoffelmayr B, Hoppe RB. Efficacy of a training block in psychosocial medicine for interns. Research in Medical Education, Proc 28th Annu Conf, 1989;93–8.

  38. Smith RC. Teaching interviewing skills to medical students: the issue of ‘countertransference.’ J Med Educ. 1984;59:582–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Smith RC. Unrecognized responses by physicians during the interview. J Med Educ. 1986;61:982–4.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Smith RC, Zimny GH. Physicians’ emotional reactions to patients. Psychosomatics. 1988;29:392–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Gorlin R, Zucker HD. Physicians’ reactions to patients: a key to teaching humanistic medicine. N Engl J Med. 1983;308:1059–63.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Smith RC. Use and management of physicians’ feelings during the interview. In: Lipkin M, Putnam SM, Lazare A (eds). The Medical Interview—A Textbook on Medical Interviewing. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Reifler B, Eaton JS. The evaluation of teaching and learning by psychiatric consultation and liaison training programs. Psychosom Med. 1978;40:99–106.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Ware JE, Strassman HD, Naftulin DH. A negative relationship between understanding interviewing principles and interview performance. J Med Educ. 1971;46:620–2.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Bandura A. Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychol Rev. 1977;84:191–215.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Shunk DH. Self-efficacy and classroom learning. Psychol Schools. 1985;22:208–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Schildkrout E. Medical residents’ difficulty in learning and utilizing a psychosocial perspective. J Med Educ. 1980;55:962–4.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Johnson AH. Assessing counselling skills and attitudes in family practice residents. J Fam Pract. 1979;9:447–52.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Sherer LM, Johnson AH. Resident development in family practice training: a personal counselling program. J Fam Pract. 1980;10:1017–23.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Ekstein R, Wallerstein RS. The teaching and learning of psychotherapy (2nd edition). New York: International Universities Press, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Schuster DB, Sandt JJ, Thaler OF. Clinical supervision of the psychiatric resident. New York: Brunner/Mazel, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Lipkin M, Quill T, Napodano R. The medical interview: a core curriculum for residencies in internal medicine. Ann Intern Med. 1984;100:277–84.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. the Departments of Medicine, Psychiatry, and Communication, Michigan State University College of Human Medicine and College of Communication Arts and Sciences, East Lansing, Michigan

    Robert C. Smith MD & Alicia A. Marshall PhD

  2. the Department of Psychiatry, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia

    Steven A. Cohen-Cole MD

Authors
  1. Robert C. Smith MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Alicia A. Marshall PhD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Steven A. Cohen-Cole MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Smith, R.C., Marshall, A.A. & Cohen-Cole, S.A. The efficacy of intensive biopsychosocial teaching programs for residents. J Gen Intern Med 9, 390–396 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02629520

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02629520

Key words

Search

Navigation