Skip to main content
Log in

Teaching humanistic and psychosocial aspects of care

Current practices and attitudes

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Journal of General Internal Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Objective

To assess current practices and attitudes toward teaching humanistic and psychosocial aspects of care in internal medicine residency programs.

Design and participants: Survey questionnaires were sent to residency directors at all 434 internal medicine residency programs accredited in 1985–1986. Response rate for two mailings was 71%.

Measurements and main results: 78% of residency directors and 70% of department chairpersons bad high or moderately high levels of commitment to teaching bumanistic/psychosocial aspects of care, but only 44% of responding programs offered mandatory training, and only 18% offered elective training in these areas. Obstacles to expanded teaching of the bumanistic/psychosocial aspects rated high or moderately high by residency directors included insufficient curriculum time (51%), lack of trained faculty (44%), and pressures to reduce both training costs (40%) and patient-care costs (37%).

Conclusions: Most of the training that does occur in the humanistic/psychosocial aspects of care probably happens informally via mentoring and role modeling. Appeals to expand teaching in these areas raise questions regarding what to include in medical training and the proper scope of internal medicine. Sustainable change will depend on the politics of resource distribution and the influence of general internal medicine and primary care on traditional training.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bok D. Needed: a new way to train doctors. Harvard Magazine, 1984; May-June: 32–43, 70–1.

  2. Culliton BJ. Medical education under fire. Science. 1984;236:419–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Engel GL. The biopsychosocial model and the education of health professionals. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1978;310:169–81.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Karpf M, Levey GS. Divisions of general internal medicine: accomplishments and needs. Ann Intern Med. 1985;103:456–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Regier DA, Goldberg ID, Taube CA. The de facto U.S. mental health services system. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1978;35:685–93.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Thompson TL. Psychiatry in primary care medicine. In: Cavenar J, ed. Psychiatry. Vol. 2. Philadelphia: J.B. Lippincott Co., 1985:1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Thompson TL, Thomas MR. Teaching psychiatry to primary care internists. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 1985;7:210–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Bird J, Cohen-Cole SA, Boker J, Freeman A. Teaching psychiatry to non-psychiatrists I: the application of educational methodology. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 1983;5:247–53.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Cohen-Cole SA, Boker J, Bird J, Freeman A. Psychiatric education for primary care: a pilot study of needs of residents. J Med Educ. 1982;57:931–6.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Houpt JL, Orleans CS, George LK, Brodie KH. The role of psychiatric and behavioral factors in the practice of medicine. Am J Psychiatry. 1980;137:37–47.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Smith GR, Monson RA, Ray DC. Psychiatric consultation in somatization disorder: a randomized controlled study. N Engl J Med. 1986;314:1407–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Cummings NA, VandenBos GR. The twenty year Kaiser Permanente experience with psychotherapy and medical utilization. Health Policy Q. 1981;2:150–74.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Engel GL. The need for a new medical model: a challenge for biomedicine. Science. 1977;196:129–36.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Cavanaugh SV, Kennedy S. A successful psychiatric training program for medical residents. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 1986;8:73–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Cohen-Cole SA, Bird J. Teaching psychiatry to nonpsychiatrists II: a model curriculum. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 1984;6:1–11.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Brown JT, Harris RT. The medical psychiatric unit and psychosocial education of internists. Psychosomatics. 1985;26:231–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Koran LM, Barnes LA. The Stanford comprehensive medical unit: integrating psychiatric and medical care. In: Kuldau J, ed. New directions for mental health services: treatment for psychosomatic problems. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1982:61–73.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Fink PJ. Psychiatry and primary care: can a working relationship develop? Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 1985;7:205–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Duffy DL, Hamerman D, Cohen MA. Communication skills of house officers. Ann Intern Med. 1980;93:354–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Friedman RH, Pozen JT. The academic viability of general internal medicine. Ann Intern Med. 1985;103:439–44.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Eisenberg JM. The internist as gatekeeper. Ann Intern Med. 1985;102:537–43.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Strain JJ, Pincus HA, Gise LH, Houpt J. Mental health education in three primary care specialties. J Med Educ. 1986;61:958–66.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Bennett SE, Goodson JD, Izen JE, et al. Comparing ambulatory care practices of primary care and traditional medicine residents. Med Care. 1985;23:816–22.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Daley J, Harrington JT. The characteristics of training in ambulatory medicine in U.S. residents. J Med Educ. 1985;60:355–66.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Committee on Evaluation in General Internal Medicine, American Board of Internal Medicine. Clinical competence in internal medicine. Ann Intern Med. 1979;90:402–11.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Subcommittee on Evaluation of Humanistic Qualities in the Internist, American Board of Internal Medicine. Evaluation of humanistic qualities in the internist. Ann Intern Med. 1983;99:720–4.

    Google Scholar 

  27. American Medical Association. Directory of residency training programs. Chicago: 1985.

  28. Linn LS, Brook RH, Clark VA, Fink A, Kosecoff J. Evaluation of ambulatory care training by graduates of internal medicine residencies. J Med Educ. 1986;61:293–302.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Perkoff G. Teaching clinical medicine in the ambulatory setting. N Engl J Med. 1986;314:27–31.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Basson MD. How can we train doctors to be more humanistic? In: Basson MD, ed. Progress in clinical and biological research, Vol. 38: ethics, humanism and medicine. New York: Alan R. Liss, Inc., 1980;67–8.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Mattews DA, Voytovich AE. An appraisal of goals for residency training in internal medicine. J Med Educ. 1985;60:536–44.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Doran GA. Scientism vs. humanism in medical education. Soc Sci Med. 1983;17:1831–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Kosecoff J, Fink A, Brook RH, et al. General medical care and the education of internists in university hospitals: an evaluation of the teaching hospital general medicine group practice program. Ann Intern Med. 1985;102:250–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Merkel, W.T., Margolis, R.B. & Smith, R.C. Teaching humanistic and psychosocial aspects of care. J Gen Intern Med 5, 34–41 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02602307

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02602307

Key words

Navigation