Skip to main content
Log in

Sampling error as a misleading artifact in “key factor analysis”

  • Published:
Researches on Population Ecology

Summary

The influences of sampling error in key factor analysis are investigated statistically. The error involved in the data distorts the results in various misleading ways. In the course of detecting key factors by correlation analysis, the distortion arises in the following two ways: (1) the contributions made by the first and the last components of population trend index (logI orK) to the total variation are overrated as compared with the others; and (2) spurious negative correlation arises between successive two components. The risk of misinterpretation due to such disturbance is usually increased further if the error is concentrated on any particular developmental stages. In the tests to detect density-dependence by using regression analysis, the error consistently acts as if it were a density-dependent factor: under the effect of sampling error, the slopeb for the regression of logN i+1 on logN i , for example, is expected to become<1 even where there is no density-dependent factor at all. A set of formulas are derived which may serve to check and correct these misleading distortions caused by the error. It is also shown that such undesirable influences can be avoided, at least to a considerable extent, if appropriate sampling plans are adopted for the study. The validity of key factor analysis is discussed in reference to this and some related problems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Clark, L. R., P. W. Geier, R. D. Hughes andR. F. Morris (1967)The ecology of populations in theory and practice. Methuen, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eberhardt, L. L. (1970) Correlation, regression and density dependence.Ecology,51:306–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Itô, Y., A. Shibazaki andO. Iwahashi (1969) Biology ofHyphantria cuneaDruly (Lepidoptera: Arctiidae) in Japan. IX. Population dynamics.Res. Popul. Ecol.11:211–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iwao, S. (1968) A new regression method for analyzing the aggregation pattern of animal populations.Res. Popul. Ecol.10:1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iwao, S. andE. Kuno (1968) Use of the regression of mean crowding on mean density for estimating sample size and the transformation of data for the analysis of variance.Res. Popul. Ecol.10:210–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iwao, S. andE. Kuno (1971) An approach to the analysis of aggregation pattern in biological populations. pp. 461–513 inStatistical ecology Vol. 1 (ed.G. P. Patilet al.). Pennsylvania Univ. Press, University Park and London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, J. (1963)Econometric methods. McGraw Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kendall, M. G. andA. Stuart (1967)The advanced theory of statistics. Vol. 2 (2nd ed.) Griffin, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuno, E. (1969) A new method of sequential sampling to obtain the population estimates with a fixed level of precision.Res. Popul. Ecol.11:127–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuno, E. andN. Hokyo (1970) Comparative analysis of the population dynamics of rice leafhoppers,Nephotettix cincticepsUhler andNilaparvata lugensStâl, with special reference to natural regulation of their numbers.Res. Popul. Ecol.12:154–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Madansky, A. (1959) The fitting of straight lines when both variables are subject to error.J. Amer. Stat. Assoc.54:137–205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maelzer, D. A. (1970) The regression of logNn+1 on logN n as a test of density dependence: An exercise with computer-constructed density independent populations.Ecology51:810–822.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morris, R. F. (1959) Single factor analysis in population dynamics.Ecology40:580–588.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morris, R. F. (1963a) pp. 30–37 inThe dynamics of epidemic spruce budworm populations. (ed.R. F. Morris)Mem. Ent. Soc. Canada31.

  • Morris, R. F. (1963b) Predictive population equations based on key factors.Mem. Ent. Soc. Canada.32:16–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mott, D. G. (1966) The analysis of determination in population systems. pp. 179–194 inSystems analysis in ecology (ed.K. E. F. Watt), Academic Press, London and New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solomon, M. E. (1964) Analysis of processes involved in the natural control of insects.Adv. Ecol. Res.2:1–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Southwood, T. R. E. (1966)Ecological methods with particular reference to insect populations. Methuen, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • St. Amant, J. L. (1970) The detection of regulation in animal populations.Ecology51:823–828.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tintner, G. (1952)Econometrics. John Wiley and Sons Inc., New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Varley, G. C. andG. R. Gradwell (1960) Key factors in population studies.J. Anim. Ecol.29: 399–401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Varley, G. C. andG. R. Gradwell (1963) The interpretation of insect population changes.Proc. Ceylon Assoc. Adv. Sci.18 (D):142–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Varley, G. C. andG. R. Gradwell (1968) Population models for the winter moth. pp. 132–142 inInsect abundance (ed.T. R. E. Southwood). Blackwell, Oxford and Edinburgh.

    Google Scholar 

  • Varley, G. C. andG. R. Gradwell (1970) Recent advances in insect population dynamics.Ann. Rev. Ent.15:1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watt, K. E. F. (1963) Mathematical population models for five agricultural crop pests.Mem. Ent. Soc. Canada.32:83–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watt, K. E. F. (1964) Density dependence in population fluctuations.Can. Ent.96:1147–1148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watt, K. E. F. (1968)Ecology and resource management. McGraw-Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Contributions from JIBP-PT No. 120.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kuno, E. Sampling error as a misleading artifact in “key factor analysis”. Res Popul Ecol 13, 28–45 (1971). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02522011

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02522011

Keywords

Navigation