Skip to main content
Log in

Methods for descriptive factor analysis of multivariate geostatistical data: a case-study comparison

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We consider the framework in which vectors of variables are observed at different points in a region. Such data are typically characterized by point-wise correlations among the variables, as well as spatial autocorrelation and cross-correlation. To help understand and model this dependence structure, one may define factors which operate at different spatial scales. We consider four such factor-analytic techniques: the linear model of coregionalization (LMC) and three recently proposed alternatives. We apply them to the same set of data, concentrations of major ions in water samples taken from springs in a carbonate mountain aquifer. The methods give quite different results for the spring chemistry, with those of the LMC being much more interpretable. We suggest some possible explanations for this, which may be relevant in other applications as well.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bailey TC, Barcellos C, Krzanowski WJ (2005) Use of spatial factors in the analysis of heavy metals in sediments in a Brazilian coastal region. Environmetrics 16:563–572

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bailey TC, Krzanowski WJ (2000) Extensions to spatial factor methods with an illustration in geochemistry. Math Geol 32:657–682

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bailey TC, Krzanowski WJ (2012) An overview of approaches to the analysis and modelling of multivariate geostatistical data. Math Geosc 44:381–393

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bechler A, Romary T, Jeannée, Desnoyers, Y (2013) Geostatistical sampling opimization of contaminated facilities. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 27:1967–1974

  • Clarkson DB (1988a) Remark AS R74. A least squares version of algorithm AS 211: the F-G diagonalization algorithm. Appl Stat 37:317–321

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarkson DB (1988b) Remark AS R71. A remark on algorithm AS 211: the F-G diagonalization algorithm. Stat Aalgorithms, Appl Stat 37:147–151

    Google Scholar 

  • da Silva C, Costa J (2014) Minimum/maximum autocorrelation factors applied to grade estimation. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 28:1929–1938

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dutilleul P, Pelletier B (2011) Tests of significance for structural correlations in the linear model of coregionalization. Math Geosci 43:819–846

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goovaerts P (1992) Factorial kriging analysis: a useful tool for exploring the structure of multivariate spatial soil information. J Soil Sci 43:597–619

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goovaerts P (1993) Factorial kriging analysis of springwater contents in the Dyle River basin, Belgium. Water Resour Res 29:2115–2125

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Goovaerts P (1994a) On a controversial method for modeling a coregionalization. Math Geol 26:197–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goovaerts P (1994b) Study of spatial relationships between two sets of variables using multivariate geostatistics. Geoderma 62:93–107

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Goulard M, Voltz M (1992) Linear coregionalization model: tools for estimation and choice of cross-varioram matrix. Math Geol 24:269–286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herut B (1992) The chemical composition and sources of dissolved salts in rainwater in Israel. Ph.D. Thesis, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, 152 pp (in Hebrew)

  • Howard G, Jahnel J, Frimmel FH, McChesney D, Reed B, Schijven J, Braun-Howland E (2006) Human excreta and sanitation: potential hazards and information needs. Protecting groundwater for health: managing the quality of drinking-water sources. World Health Organization, London, pp 275–308

    Google Scholar 

  • Ignaccolo R, Mateu J, Giraldo R (2014) Kriging with external drift for functional data for air quality monitoring. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 28:1171–1186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Journel AG, Huijbregts ChJ (1978) Mining geostatistics. Academic Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Krzanowski WJ, Bailey TC (2007) Extraction of spatial features using factor methods illustrated on stream sediment data. Math Geol 39:69–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kunsch HR, Papritz A, Bassi F (1997) Generalized cross- covariances and their estimation. Math Geol 29:779–799

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lark RM, Papritz A (2003) Fitting a linear model of coregionalization for soil properties using simulated annealing. Geoderma 115:245–260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larocque G, Dutilleul P, Pelletier B, Fyles J (2007) Characterization and Quantification of Uncertainty in Coregionalization Analysis. Math Geol 39:263–288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maestre FT, Rodriguez F, Bautista S, Cortina J, Bellot J (2005) Spatial associations and patterns of perennial vegetation in a semi-arid steppe: a multivariate geostatistics approach. Plant Ecol 179:133–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Minozzo1, M., and Fruttini, D. (2004) Loglinear spatial factor analysis: an application to diabetes mellitus complications. Environmetrics 15:423–434

  • Morisette J (1997) Examples using SAS to fit the model of linear coregionalization. Comput Geosci 23:317–323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oman SD, Vakulenko-Lagun B (2009) Estimation of sill matrices in the linear model of coregionalization. Math Geosci 41:15–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pelletier B, Dutilleul P, Larocque G, Fyles JW (2004) Fitting the linear model of coregionalization by generalized least squares. Math Geol 36:323–343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Switzer P, Green A (1984). Min/max autocorrelation factors for multivariate spatial imagery. Technical Report No. 6, Stanford University

  • Wackernagel H (1989) Description of a computer program for analyzing multivariate spatially distributed data. Comput Geosci 15:593–598

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wackernagel H (1994) Cokriging versus kriging in regionalized multivariate data analysis. Geoderma 62:83–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webster R, Atteia O, Dubois JP (1994) Coregionalization of trace metals in the soil in the Swiss Jura. Eur J Soil Sci 45:205–218

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang H (2007) Maximum-likelihood estimation for multivariate spatial linear coregionalization models. Environmetrics 18:125–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the reviewers for their very helpful comments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Samuel D. Oman.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Oman, S.D., Vakulenko-Lagun, B. & Zilberbrand, M. Methods for descriptive factor analysis of multivariate geostatistical data: a case-study comparison. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 29, 1103–1116 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-014-1002-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-014-1002-4

Keywords

Navigation