Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

An investigation into the usefulness of a cladistic approach to the study of the origin of anatomically modern humans

  • Published:
Human Evolution

Abstract

Cladistic analyses for the study of hominid evolution become very common during the last two decades, but little attention has been given to the appropriateness of the approach to studies being undertaken. This paper discusses how cladistic analyses have been used in studies of late Middle and Upper Pleicostocene hominids without due consideration of the problems inherent within the approach. It is concluded that in studies of the origin of anatomicaly modern humans a strict cladistic approach is inappropriate because it takes too narrow a view (presence/absence) of morphology, and in doing so does not allow for morphological variation. A phenetic approach which is interested in overall morphological similarity based on many characters and attempts to sample the total morphological variability evident within a sample would seem a more appropriate approach in such studies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andrews P., 1984a.An alternative interpretation of the characters used to define Homo erectus. Courier Forschungs institut Senckenberg, 69: 167–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrews P., 1984b.The Descent of Man. New Scientists, 102: 24–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asfaw B., 1983.A new hominid parietal from Bodo, Middle Awash Valley, Ethiopia. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 61: 367–371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashlock P. D., 1971.Monophyly and associated terms. Systematic Zoology, 16: 63–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashlock P. D., 1972.Monophyly again. Systematic Zoology, 21: 430–438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashlock P. D., 1974.The uses of cladistics. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 5: 81–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bilsborough A. &Wood, B. A. 1986.The nature, origin and fate of Homo erectus. In B. Wood, L. Martin and P. Andrews (eds.) Major Topics in Primate and Human Evolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 295–316.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blumberg J. E., Hylander W. L. &Goepp R. A. 1971.Taurodontisms: a biometric study. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 34: 243–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brace C. L., 1981.Tales of the phylogenetic woods: the evolution and significance of evolutionary trees. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 56: 411–429.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown F., Harris J., Leakey R. &Walker A., 1985.Early Homo erectus skeleton from west Lake Turkana, Kenya. Nature, 416: 788–792.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chamberlain, A. T. &Wood B. A., 1987.Early hominid phylogeny. Journal of Human Evolution, 16: 1119–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charig A., 1981.Cladistics: a different point of view. Biologist, 28: 19–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke R. J., 1976.New cranium of Homo erectus from Lake Ndutu, Tanzania, Nature, 262: 485–487.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coon C. S., 1962.The Origin of Races. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cracraft J., 1981.Pattern and process in palaeobiology: the role of cladistic analysis in systematic paleontology. Paleaeobiology, 7: 456–468.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darlington P. J., Jr. 1970.A practical criticism of Hennig-Brundin «phylogenetic systematics» and Antartic biogeneography. Systematic Zoology, 19: 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Day M. H., 1971.Postcranial remains of Homo erectus from Bed IV, Olduvai Gorge, Tanzania. Nature, 232: 383–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Day M. H., 1982.The Homo erectus pelvis: punctuation or gradualism? Prétirage, Premier Congres International de Paléontologie Humaine, Nice. Nice: C.N.R.S., pp. 814–846.

    Google Scholar 

  • Day M. H., 1984.The postcranial remains of Homo erectus from Africa, Asia and possibly Europe. Courier Forschungs institut Senckenberg, 69: 113–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Day, M. H. & Stringer C. B. A reconstruction of the Omo Kibish remains and the erectus-sapiens transition. Préirage, Premier Congres International de Paléontologie Humaine. Nice. Nice: C.N.R.S., pp. 814–846.

  • Delson E., 1978.Models of early hominid phylogeny. In C. Jolly (ed.) Eary Hominids of Africa. London: Duckworth, pp. 519–541.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delson E., Eldredge N. &Tattersall I., 1977.Reconstruction of hominid phylogeny: a testable framework based on cladistic analysis. Journal of Human Evolution, 6: 263–268.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eldredge N. &Cracaft J., 1980.Phylogenetic Patterns and the Evolutionary Process. Method and Theory in Comparative Biology. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eldredge N. &Tattersall I., 1975.Evolutionary models, phylogenetic reconstruction and another look at hominid phylogeny. In F. S. Szalay (ed.) Approaches to Primate Paleobiology. Basel: Karger, pp. 218–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eldredge N. &Tattersall I., 1982.The Myths of Human Evolution. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Felsenstein J., 1978.Cases in which parsimony and compatibility methods will be positively misleading. Systematic Zoology, 27: 401–410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gardiner B. G., Janvier P., Patterson C., Forey P. L., Greenwood P. H., Miles R. S. &Jefferies R. P. S., 1979.The Salmon, the lungfish and the cow: a reply Nature, 277: 175–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gingerich P. D., 1979.The stratophenetic approach to phylogeny reconstruction in vertebrate palaentology. In J. Craycraft and J. Eldredge (eds.) Phylogenetic Analysis and Paleontology. New York: Columbia University Press, pp. 41–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grimaud D., 1982.Le parietal de l’Homme de Tautavel. Prétirage, Premier Congres International de Paléontologie Humaine, Nice. Nice: C.N.R.S., pp. 62–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Groves C. P. (in press).A regional approach to the problem of the origin of modern humans in Australasia. In P. Mellars and C. B. Stringer (eds.) The Origin and Dispersal of Modern Humans: Behavioural and Biological Perspectives.

  • Habgood P. J., in prep.A morphometric Investigation into the Origin of Anatomically Modern Humans. British Archaeological Reports.

  • Halstead L. B., 1978.The cladistic revolution-can it make the grade? Nature, 276: 759–760.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halstead, L. B., White E. I. &MacIntyre G. T., 1979.Reply to B. G. Gardiner et al.. Nature, 277: 176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harper C. W. &Platnick N. I., 1978.Phylogenetic and cladistic hypotheses: a debate. Systematic Zoology, 27: 354–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hennig W., 1966.Phylogenetic Systematics. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmes E. B., 1980.Reconsideration of some systematic concepts and terms. Evolutionary Theory, 5: 35–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howell F. C., 1978.Homindae. In V. J. Maglio and H. B. S. Cooke (eds.) Evolution of African Mammals. Cambridge (Mass): Harvard University Press, pp. 154–248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hublin J. J., 1986.Some comments on the diagnostic features of Homo erectus. Anthropos (Brno), 23: 175–185.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacob T., 1966.The sixth skull cap of Pithecanthropus erectus. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 25: 243–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kallay J., 1963.A radiographic study of the Neanderthal teeth from Krapina, Croatia. In D. R. Brothwell (ed.) Dental Anthropology. London: Pergamon Press, pp. 75–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kallay J., 1970.Peculiarities of Krapina Neanderthal teeth. In M. Males (ed.) Krapina 1899–1969. Zagreb: Jugoslavenska akademije znanosti i umjetnosti, pp. 175–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy G. E., 1983.Some aspects of femoral morphology in Homo erectus. Journal of Human Evolution, 12: 587–616.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy G. E., 1984a.The emergence of Homo sapiens: the post cranial evidence. Man, 19: 94–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy G. E., 1984b.Are the Know Swamp hominids «archaic»? American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 65: 163–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laitman J. T., Heimbuck R. C. &Crenlin E. S., 1979.The basicranium of fossil hominids as an indicator of their upper respiratory system. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 51: 15–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larnach S. L. & Macintosh N. W. G., 1966.The Craniology of the Aborigenes of Coastal New South Wales. Oceania Monographs No. 13.

  • Larnach S. L. & Macintosh N. W. G., 1970.The Craniology of the Aborigenes of Queensland. Oceania Monographs No. 15.

  • Larnach S. L. &Macintosh N. W. G., 1974.A comparative study of Solo and Australian Aboriginal crania. In A. P. Elkin and N. W. G. Macintosh (eds.) Grafton Elliot Smith: The Man and his Work. Sydney: Sydney University Press, pp. 95–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leakey R. E. F. &Walker A. C., 1985.Further hominids from the Plio-Pliestocene of Koobi Fora, Kenya. American Journal of Physical Anthropoogy, 67: 135–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Le Gros Clark W. E., 1964.The Fossil Evidence for Human Evolution (2nd revised edition). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lumley M.-A. &Sonakia A., 1985.Premiere decouverte d’un Homo erectus sur le continent Indien a Hatnora, dans la Moyenne Vallée de la Narmada. L’Anthropologie, 89: 13–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mallegni F., Mariani-Costantini R., Fornaciari G., Longo E. T., Giacobini G. &Radmilli A. M., 1983.New European fossil hominid material from an Acheulian site near Rome (Castel di Guido). American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 62: 263–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayr E., 1965a.Numerical phenetics and taxonomic theory. Systematic Zoology, 14: 73–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayr E., 1965b.Classification and phylogeny American Zoology, 5: 165–174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayr E., 1969.Principles of Systematic Zoology. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pancher A. L., 1979.The cladistic debate continued. Nature, 280: 542.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pardoe C., (in press).The inferior petrosal sinus, a non-metric trait restricted to Oceania. Canadian Review of Physical Anthropology.

  • Pichardo M., 1978.Phenetic vs. cladistic systematics: a response to Thoma. Journal of Human Evolution, 7: 151–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pilbeam D., 1986.The origin of Homo sapiens: the fossil evidence. In B. Wood, L. Martin and P. Andrews (eds.) Major Topics in Primate and Human Evolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 331–338.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riesenfield A., 1956.Shovel-shaped incisors and a few other dental features among native peoples of the Pacific. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 14: 505–521.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richtmire G. P., 1980.Homo erectus and human evolution in the African Middle Pleistocene. In L-K. Konigsson (ed.) Current Argument on Early Man. Oxford: Pergamon Press, pp. 70–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rightmire G. P., 1983.The Lake Ndutu cranium and early Homo sapiens in Africa. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 61: 245–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rightmire G. P., 1984.Comparisons of Homo erectus from Africa and Southeast Asia. Courier Forschungs institut Senckenberg, 69: 83–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Santa Luca A. P., 1980The Ngandong Fossil Hominids: A Comparative Study of a Far Eastern Homo erectus Group. Yale University Publications in Anthropology, No. 78.

  • Skelton R. R., McHenry H. M. &Drawhorn G. M., 1986.Phylogenetic analysis of early hominids. Current Anthropology, 27: 21–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stringer C. B., 1985.The definition of Homo erectus and the existence of the species in Africa and Europe. Courier Forschungs institut Senckenberg, 69: 131–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stringer C. B., 1985.Middle Pleistocene hominid variability and the origin of late Pleistocene humans. In E. Delson (ed.) Ancestors: The Hard Evidence. New York: Alan R. Liss, pp. 289–295.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stringer C. B., 1987.A numerical cladistic analysis for the genus Homo. Journal of Human Evolution, 16: 135–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stringer C. B., Howell F. C. &Melentis J. K., 1979.The significance of the fossil hominid skull from Petralona, Greece. Journal of Archaeological Science, 6: 235–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stringer C. B., Hublin J. J. &Vandermeersch B., 1984.The origin of anatomically modern humans in Western Europe. In F. H. Smith and F. Spencer (eds.) The Origin of Modern Humans: A World Survey of the Fossil Evidence. New York: Alan R. Liss, pp. 51–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szalay F. S., 1987.Ancetors, descendents sister groups and testing of phylogenetic hypotheses. Systematic Zoology 26: 12–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tattersall I. &Eldredge N., 1977.Fact, Theory, and Fantasy in Human Paleontology. American Scientists, 65: 204–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trinkaus E., 1983.The Shanidar Neanderthals, New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valen L. M. van, 1978.Why not be a cladist? Evolutionary Theory, 3: 285–299.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vrba E. S., 1980.Evolution, species and fossils: how does life evolve? South African Journal of Science, 76: 61–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weidenreich F., 1943.The skull of Sinanthropus pekinensis: a comparative study on a primitive hominid skull. Palaeontologia Sinica, n. s. D, No. 10 (whole series No. 127).

  • Weidenreich F., 1951.Morphology of Solo man. Anthropological Papers of the American Museum of Natural History, 43: 205–290.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiley E. O., 1979.Cladograms and phylogenetic trees. Systematic Zoology, 28: 88–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolpoff M. H., 1986.Describing anatomically modern Homo sapiens — a distribution without a definable difference. Anthropos (Brno), 23: 41–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolpoff M. H., Wu Xinzhi &Thorne A. G., 1984.A general theory of hominid evolution involving the fossil evidence from East Asia. In F. H. Smith and F. Spencer (eds.) The Original of Modern Humans: A World Survey of the Fossil Evidence. New York: Alan R. Liss, pp. 411–484.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu Xinzhi, 1981.A well-preserved cranium of an archaic type of early Homo sapiens from Dali, China, Scientia Sinica, 24: 530–539.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Anthropology, University of Sydney, 2006, N.S.W., Australia

    P. J. Habgood

Authors
  1. P. J. Habgood
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Habgood, P.J. An investigation into the usefulness of a cladistic approach to the study of the origin of anatomically modern humans. Hum. Evol. 4, 241–252 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02437264

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02437264

Key words

Search

Navigation