Skip to main content
Log in

Infant-use by male gelada in agonistic contexts: Agonistic buffering, progeny protection or soliciting support?

  • Published:
Primates Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Two alternative theories have been proposed to explain why some male primates carry infants during agonistic encounters with other males. The first (agonistic buffering) suggests that males carry the infants of higher ranking opponents in order to defuse the latter's aggression; the second (progeny protection) suggests that males carry their own infants as a warning to opponents that they will be prepared to fight vigorously in order to protect their offspring from injury. Evidence is presented to show that both occur in gelada baboons under different circumstances and that, in addition, infant-use may in at least some cases involve indirect solicitation of support from a third party (normally the infant's mother).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Busse, C. &W. J. Hamilton, 1981. Infant carrying by male chacma baboons.Science, 212: 1281–1283.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crook, J. H., 1966. Gelada baboon herd structure and movement: a comparative report.Symp. Zool. Soc., London, 18: 237–258.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deag, J. M. &J. H. Crook, 1971. Social behaviour and “agonistic buffering” in the wild Barbary macaque.Folia Primatol., 15: 183–200.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dunbar, R. I. M., 1983. Structure of gelada baboon reproductive units. III. The male's relationship with his females.Anim. Behav., 31: 565–575.

    Google Scholar 

  • ————, 1984.Reproductive Decisions: An Economic Analysis of Gelada Baboon Social Strategies. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———— &P. Dunbar, 1975.Social Dynamics of Gelada Baboons. S. Karger, Basel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hrdy, S. B., 1979. Infanticide among mammals: a review classification and examination of the implications for the reproductive strategies of females.Ethol. Sociobiol., 1: 13–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Itani, J., 1959. Paternal care in the wild Japanese monkey,Macaca fuscata fuscata.Primates, 2: 61–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kawai, M. (ed.), 1979.Ecological and Sociological Studies of Gelada Baboons. Kodansha, Tokyo & S. Karger, Basel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kummer, H., 1967. Tripartite relations in hamadryas baboons. In:Social Communication Among Primates,S. A. Altmann (ed.), Chicago Univ. Press, Chicago, pp. 63–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mori, U., 1979. Individual relationships within a unit. In:Ecological and Sociological Studies of Gelada Baboons,M. Kawai (ed.), Kodansha, Tokyo & S. Karger, Basel, pp. 93–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Packer, C., 1980. Male care and exploitation of infants inPapio anubis.Anim. Behav., 28: 512–520.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ransom, T. W. &B. S. Ransom, 1971. Adult-male-infant relations among baboons (Papio anubis).Folia Primatol., 16: 179–195.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Struhsaker, T. T., 1977. Infanticide and social organization in the redtail monkey (Cercopithecus ascanius schmidti) in the Kibale Forest, Uganda.Z. Tierpsychol., 45: 75–84.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

About this article

Cite this article

Dunbar, R.I.M. Infant-use by male gelada in agonistic contexts: Agonistic buffering, progeny protection or soliciting support?. Primates 25, 28–35 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02382293

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02382293

Keywords

Navigation