Skip to main content
Log in

Synthesis and release of proteases byBacteroides fragilis

  • Published:
Current Microbiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Protease production byBacteroides fragilis ATCC 25285 was determined in batch and continuous cultures. During exponential growth in batch culture, the majority of proteolysis was cell associated. However, as the bacteria reached stationary phase, most of the intracellular proteases were released into the culture medium. Measurements of alkaline phosphatase and β-galactosidase, which are respectively periplasmic and cytoplasmic marker enzymes inB. fragilis, showed that secretion of proteases in the stationary phase was a discrete event and was not associated with a general release of cytoplasmic contents. When the bacterium was grown in continuous culture, cell-associated protease activity increased concomitantly with dilution rate (D=0.03–0.23/h). The ratio of intracellular to whole cell protease activity also increased with growth rate (1∶1 at D=0.03/h; 1∶1.7 at D=0.23/h). Extracellular protease activity was detected only in trace amounts in continuous cultures at the lowest dilution rate. Determinations of the distribution of extracellular protease activity in batch culture after 48 h incubation showed that the majority of proteolysis (ca. 90%) was soluble. Nevertheless, a proportion was associated with particulate fractions, which had high specific activities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature cited

  1. Barrett AJ (1977) Enzyme and metabolic inhibitors, vol. 2. New York: Academic Press, pp 721–795

    Google Scholar 

  2. Berg JO (1981) Cellular localization of glycoside hydrolases inBacteroides fragilis type bacteria. Curr Microbiol 5:13–17

    Google Scholar 

  3. Englyst HN, Hay S, Macfarlane GT (1987) Polysaccharide breakdown by mixed populations of human faecal bacteria. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 95:163–171

    Google Scholar 

  4. Finegold SM, Sutter VL, Mathisen GE (1983) Normal indigenous intestinal microflora. In: Hentges DJ (ed) Human intestinal microflora in health and disease. London: Academic Press, pp 3–31

    Google Scholar 

  5. Gibson SAW, Macfarlane GT (1988) Studies on the proteolytic activity ofBacteroides fragilis. J Gen Microbiol 134:19–27

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Gibson SAW, Macfarlane GT (1988) Characterization of proteases formed byBacteroides fragilis. J Gen Microbiol 134:2231–2240

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Gibson SAW, Mcfarlan C, Hay S, Macfarlane GT (1989) Significance of microflora in proteolysis in the colon. Appl Environ Microbiol 55:679–683

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Ginsburg I (1985) Streptococcal enzymes and virulence. In: Holder IA (ed) Bacterial enzymes and virulence. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, pp 121–144

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hausmann E, Kaufman E (1969) Collagenase activity in a particulate fraction fromBacteroides melaninogenicus. Biochim Biophys Acta 194:612–615

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Holdeman LV, Cato EP, Moore WEC (eds) (1977) Anaerobic laboratory manual, 4th edn. Blacksburg: Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University

    Google Scholar 

  11. Keith SM, Herbert RA (1983) Dissimilatory nitrate reduction by a strain ofDesulfovibrio desulfuricans. FEMS Microbiol Lett 18:55–59

    Google Scholar 

  12. Lowry OH, Rosebrough NJ, Farr AL, Randall RJ (1953) Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent. J Biol Chem 193:265–275

    Google Scholar 

  13. Macfarlane GT, Englyst HN (1986) Starch utilisation by the human large intestinal microflora. J Appl Bacteriol 60:195–201

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Macfarlane GT, Gibson GR (1991) Formation of glycoprotein degrading enzymes byBacteroides fragilis. FEMS Microbiol Lett 77:289–294

    Google Scholar 

  15. Macfarlane GT, Macfarlane S (1991) Utilization of pancreatic trypsin by proteolytic and non-proteolyticBacteroides fragilis-type bacteria. Curr Microbiol 23:143–148

    Google Scholar 

  16. Macy JM, Probst I (1979) The biology of gastrointestinalBacteroides. Annu Rev Microbiol 33:561–594

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Matsubara H, Feder J (1971) Other bacterial, mold and yeast proteases. In: Boyer PD (ed) The enzymes, vol. 3. New York: Academic Press, pp 721–795

    Google Scholar 

  18. Morihara K, Homma JY (1985)Pseudomonas proteases. In: Holder IA (ed) Bacterial enzymes and virulence. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, pp 41–79

    Google Scholar 

  19. Riepe SP, Goldstein J, Alpens DH (1980) Effect of secretedBacteroides proteases on human intestinal brush border enzymes. J Clin Invest 66:314–322

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Salyers AA (1984)Bacteroides of the human lower intestinal tract. Annu Rev Microbiol 38:293–313

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Smalley JW, Birss AJ (1987) Trypsin-like enzyme activity of the extracellular membrane vesicles ofBacteroides gingivalis W50. J Gen Microbiol 133:2883–2894

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Webb JL (1966) Enzyme and metabolic inhibitors, vol. 2. New York: Academic Press, pp 729–985

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Macfarlane, G.T., Macfarlane, S. & Gibson, G.R. Synthesis and release of proteases byBacteroides fragilis . Current Microbiology 24, 55–59 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01570100

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01570100

Keywords

Navigation