Skip to main content
Log in

The binding kinetics and interaction of DNA fluorochromes used in the analysis of nuclei and chromosomes by flow cytometry

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Histochemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The interactions and binding characteristics of DNA dyes used in the flow cytometric analysis of chromatin were studied using human chromosomes and mouse thymocyte nuclei. The kinetics of dye binding and the relationship between fluorescence intensity and dye concentration are presented. Under the conditions used, Hoechst 33258, propidium iodide and chromomycin A3 reach an equilibrium with thymocyte nuclei after approximately 5 min, 20 min and more than 1 h, respectively. The same binding kinetics are observed with Hoechst 33258 and chromomycin when nuclei are stained with a mixture of the two dyes. Sodium citrate, which improves the resolution of flow karyotypes, causes a rapid increase in Hoechst and propidium iodide fluorescence, but a decrease in the fluorescence of chromomycin. The relative peak positions of chromosomes in a flow karyotype are unaffected by sodium citrate addition. The spectral interaction between Hoechst and chromomycin is quantified. There is variation among the human chromosome types in the amount of energy transferred from Hoechst to chromomycin. By measuring the Hoechst and chromomycin fluorescence of each chromosome after Hoechst excitation, it is shown that the amount of energy transferred is correlated to the ratio of the amount of Hoechst to chromomycin bound. Although the energy transfer between the two dyes is considerable, this has little effect on the reproducibility of flow karyotype measurements. The relative peak positions of all human chromosomes in a 64×64 channel flow karyotype, except for the 13 and Y chromosomes, vary in the order of 0.5 channel over a 16-fold change in either Hoechst or chromomycin concentration. This implies that, with the present flow cytometers, variation in staining conditions will have minimal effects on the reproducibility of the relative peak positions in flow karyotypes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Collard JG, Phillippus E, Tulp A, Lebo RV, Gray JW (1984) Separation and analysis of human chromosomes by combined velocity sedimentation and flow sorting applying single- and duallaser flow cytometry. Cytometry 5:9–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Darzynkiewicz Z, Traganos F, Kapuscinski J, Staiano-Coico L, Melamed M (1984) Accessibility of DNA in situ to various flurochromes: Relationship to chromatin changes during erythroid differentiation of Friend leukemia cells. Cytometry 5:355–363

    Google Scholar 

  • Dean PN, Pinkel D (1978) High resolution dual laser flow cytometry. J Histochem Cytochem 26:622–627

    Google Scholar 

  • Engh GJ van den, Trask B, Cram S, Bartholdi M (1984) Preparation of chromosome suspensions for flow cytometry. Cytometry 5:108–117

    Google Scholar 

  • Engh GJ van den, Trask B, Gray JW, Langlois R, Yu L-C (1985) Preparation of chromosomes for flow cytometry II. Bivariate analysis of human chromosomes. Cytometry 6:92–100

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray JW, Carrano AV, Steinmetz LL, Van Dilla MA, Moore II DH, Mayall BH, Mendelsohn ML (1975) Chromosome measurement and sorting by flow systems. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 72:1231–1234

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray JW, Langlois RG, Carrano AV, Burkhart-Schultz K, Van Dilla MA (1979) High resolution chromosome analysis: One and two parameter flow cytometry. Chromosoma 73:9–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris P, Boyd E, Ferguson-Smith MA (1985) Optimizing human chromosome separation for the production of chromosome-specific DNA libraries by flow sorting. Hum Genet 70:59–65

    Google Scholar 

  • Lalande M, Schreck R, Hoffman R, Latt SA (1985) Identification of inverted duplicated nr. 15 chromosomes using bivariate flow karyotype analysis. Cytometry 6:1–6

    Google Scholar 

  • Langlois RG, Jensen RG (1979) Interactions between pairs of DNA-specific fluorescent stains bound to mammalian cells. J Histochem Cytochem 27:72–77

    Google Scholar 

  • Langlois RG, Carrano AV, Gray JW, Van Dilla MA (1980) Cytochemical studies of metaphase chromosomes by flow cytometry. Chromosoma 77:229–251

    Google Scholar 

  • Langlois RG, Yu LC, Gray JW, Carrano AV (1982) Quantitative karyotyping of human chromosomes by dual beam flow cytometry. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 79:7876–7880

    Google Scholar 

  • Latt SA, Wohlleb J (1975) Optical studies of the interaction of 33258 Hoechst with DNA, chromatin, and metaphase chromosomes. Chromosoma 25:297–316

    Google Scholar 

  • Latt SA, Sahar E, Eisenhard ME, Juergens LA (1980) Interactions between pairs of DNA-binding dyes: results and implications for chromosome analysis. Cytometry 1:2–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Lebo RV, Gorin F, Fletterick RJ, Kao F-T, Cheung M-C, Bruce BD, Kan YW (1984) Hign resolution chromosome sorting and DNA spot-blot analysis assign McArdle's syndrome to chromosome 11. Science 225:57–59

    Google Scholar 

  • Matsson P, Rydberg B (1981) Analysis of chromosomes from human peripheral lymphocytes by flow cytometry. Cytometry 1:369–372

    Google Scholar 

  • Young BD, Ferguson-Smith MA, Sillar R, Boyd E (1981) High-resolution analysis of human peripheral lymphocyte chromosomes by flow cytometry. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 78:7727–7731

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

In honour of Prof. P. van Duijn

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

van den Engh, G.J., Trask, B.J. & Gray, J.W. The binding kinetics and interaction of DNA fluorochromes used in the analysis of nuclei and chromosomes by flow cytometry. Histochemistry 84, 501–508 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00482983

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00482983

Keywords

Navigation