Skip to main content
Log in

Polarized-light sensitivity in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss): characterization from multi-unit responses in the optic nerve

  • Published:
Journal of Comparative Physiology A Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Integrated spike activity of axons from the optic nerve was measured in an investigation of the e-vector sensitive mechanism underlying the ability of rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) for orientation in downwelling, linearly-polarized light. In anaesthetized, immobilized fish, one eye was exposed to incremental light flashes which were superimposed over closely controlled background conditions. Under scotopic and various photopic conditions, intensity/response curves were generated from the on-response of the optic nerve. Relative sensitivity curves were then obtained as a function of e-vector direction for the 5 kinds of receptor cells in this trout's retina: rods, ultraviolet cones (UV), short wavelength cones (S), medium wavelength cones (M), and long wavelength cones (L).

Under scotopic conditions, no sensitivity to e-vector was apparent: thus, rods do not mediate polarization sensitivity. Under photopic conditions, parr weighing 8–10 g exhibited e-vector sensitivity in two orthogonal channels. A UV stimulus (380 nm) on a white background evoked a three-peaked response (0°, 90°, and 180°) to the e-vector orientations presented in 30° increments between 0° and 180°. In contrast, when the background was illuminated with appropriate short and long wavelength cut-off filters, M-and L-cones showed maximum responses only to the horizontal (90°) plane whether they were stimulated at their α-absorption band or their β-absorption band in the near UV. Isolated UV-cones gave maximum responses to the vertical (0° and 180°) e-vector, thus corresponding to a second channel. The blue sensitive, S-cones, did not show evidence of polarization sensitivity. As well, no evidence of the polarization sensitivity was observed under UV isolating background conditions in larger individuals, 50–78 g smolts, although the other cone mechanisms responded as in smaller individuals.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ali MA (1975) Retinomotor responses. In: Ali MA (ed) Vision in fishes. Plenum Press, New York, pp 313–355

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernard GD, Wehner R (1977) Functional similarities between polarization vision and color vision. Vision Res 17:1019–1028

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowmaker JK, Kunz YW (1987) Ultraviolet receptors, tetrachromatic colour vision and retinal mosaics in brown trout (Salmo trutta): Age dependent changes. Vision Res 27:2101–2108

    Google Scholar 

  • Cameron NE (1982) The photopic spectral sensitivity of a dichromatic teleost fish (Perca fluviatilis). Vision Res 22:1341–1348

    Google Scholar 

  • Cameron DA, Pugh EN (1991) Double cones as a basis for a new type of polarization vision in vertebrates. Nature 353:161–164

    Google Scholar 

  • Coemans M, Vos J, Nuboer J (1990) No evidence for polarization sensitivity in the pigeon. Naturwissenschaften 77:138–142

    Google Scholar 

  • Coughlin DJ, Hawryshyn CW (1993) The contribution of ultraviolet and short-wavelength sensitive cone mechanisms to color vision in rainbow trout. Brain Behav Evol (in press)

  • Davitz MA, MacKaye KR (1978) Discrimination between horizontally and vertically polarized light by the cichlid fish Pseudotropheus macrophthalmus. Copeia 2:333–334

    Google Scholar 

  • DeMarco PJ Jr, Powers MK (1991) Spectral sensitivity of On and Off responses from the optic nerve of goldfish. Visual Neurosci 6:207–217

    Google Scholar 

  • Dill PA (1971) Perception of polarized light by yearling sockeye salmon. J Fish Res Board Canada 28:1319–1322

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglas RH, Wagner HJ (1982) Endogenous patterns of photomechanical movements and their relationship to activity rhythms in teleosts. Cell Tissue Res 226:133–144

    Google Scholar 

  • Eakin (1968) Evolution of photoreceptors. Am Sci 2:194–242

    Google Scholar 

  • Fein A, Szuts EZ (1982) Photoreceptors and their role in vision. IUPAB Biophysics Series. Cambridge Univ Press, Cambridge, 212 pp

  • Forward RB Jr, Waterman TH (1972) Evidence for e-vector and light intensity pattern discrimination by the teleost Dermogenys sp. J Comp Physiol 87:189–202

    Google Scholar 

  • Forward RB Jr, Horch KW, Waterman TH (1972) Visual orientation at the water surface by the teleost Zenarchopterus. Biol Bull 143:112–126

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster DH, Ward PA (1991) Asymmetries in oriented-line detection indicate two orthogonal filters in early vision. Proc R Soc Lond B 243:75–81

    Google Scholar 

  • Groot C (1965) On the orientation of young sockeye salmon (Oncorhyncus nerka) during their seaward migration out of lakes. Behaviour [Suppl.] 14:198 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawryshyn CW (1991a) Light-adaptation properties of the ultraviolet-sensitive cone mechanism in comparison to the receptor mechanisms in goldfish. Visual Neurosci 6:293–301

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawryshyn CW (1991b) Spatial summation of cone mechanisms in goldfish. Vision Res 31:563–566

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawryshyn CW (1992) Polarization vision in fishes. Am Sci 80:164–175

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawryshyn CW, Beauchamp RD (1985) Ultraviolet photosensitivity in goldfish: an independent UV mechanism. Vision Res 25:11–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawryshyn CW, Bolger AE (1990) Spatial orientation of trout to partially polarized light. J Comp Physiol A 167:691–697

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawryshyn CW, McFarland WN (1987) Cone photoreceptor mechanisms and the detection of polarized light in fish. J Comp Physiol A 160:459–465

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawryshyn CW, Arnold MG, Chaisson DJ, Martin PC (1989) The ontogeny of ultraviolet photosensitivity in rainbow trout. Vis Neurosci 2:247–254

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawryshyn CW, Arnold MG, Bowering E, Cole RL (1990) Spatial orientation of rainbow trout to plane-polarized light: the ontogeny of E-vector discrimination and spectral sensitivity characteristics. J Comp Physiol A 166:565–574

    Google Scholar 

  • Jagger WS (1992) The optics of the spherical fish lens. Vision Res 32:1271–1284

    Google Scholar 

  • Jerlov NG (1976) Marine optics. Elsevier, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Jolly DW, Mawdesley-Thomas LE, Bucke D (1972) Anaesthesia of fish. Veterinary Record 91:424–426

    Google Scholar 

  • Kawamura G, Shibita A, Yonimori T (1981) Response of teleosts to the plane of polarized light as determined by heart rate. Bull Jpn Soc Sci Fish 47:727–729

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleerekoper H, Matis JH, Timms AM, Gesler P (1973) Locomotor response of the goldfish to polarized light and its e-vector. J Comp Physiol 86:27–36

    Google Scholar 

  • La Vail MM (1976) Rod outer segment disc shedding in relation to cyclic lighting. Exp Eye Res 23:277–280

    Google Scholar 

  • Loew ER, McFarland WN (1990) The visual environment. In: Douglas RH, Djamgoz MBA (eds) The visual system of fish. Chapman and Hall, London, pp 1–43

    Google Scholar 

  • Lythgoe J (1979) Ecology of vision. Oxford Univ Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin GR (1991) The question of polarization. Nature 350:194

    Google Scholar 

  • Sivak JG, Mandelman T (1982) Chromatic dispersion of the ocular media. Vision Res 22:997–1003

    Google Scholar 

  • Stys PK, Ransom BR, Waxman SG (1991) Compound action potential of nerve recorded by suction electrode: a theoretical and experimental analysis. Brain Res 546:18–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Waterman TH (1966) Mechanisms of polarized light perception. Science 154:467–475

    Google Scholar 

  • Waterman TH, Aoki K (1974) E-vector sensitivity patterns in the goldfish optic tectum. J Comp Physiol 95:13–45

    Google Scholar 

  • Waterman TH, Hashimoto H (1974) E-vector discrimination by goldfish optic tectum. J Comp Physiol 95:1–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Wehner R (1983) The perception of polarized light. In: Cosens DJ, Vince-Price D (eds) The biology of photoreception. Soc Exp Biol, pp 331–369

  • Wheeler TG (1979a) Retinal on and off responses convey different chromatic information to the CNS. Brain Res 160:145–149

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler TG (1979b) Retinal red sensitivity under dark-adapted conditions. Brain Res 175:140–145

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Parkyn, D.C., Hawryshyn, C.W. Polarized-light sensitivity in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss): characterization from multi-unit responses in the optic nerve. J Comp Physiol A 172, 493–500 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00213531

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00213531

Key words

Navigation