Abstract
Many studies directed at demonstrating perception without awareness have relied on the dissociation paradigm. Although the logic underlying this paradigm is relatively straightforward, definitive results have been elusive in the absence of any general consensus as to what constitutes an adequate measure of awareness. We propose an alternative approach that involves comparisons of the relative sensitivity of comparable direct and indirect indexes of perception. The only assumption required by the proposed approach is that the sensitivity of direct discriminations to relevant conscious information is greater than or equal to the sensitivity of comparable indirect discriminations. The proposed approach is illustrated through an evaluation of Avant and Thieman’s (1985) recent claim that an indirect measure of perception based on judgments of apparent visual duration provides a more sensitive indicator of perception than does a direct measure based on forced-choice recognition. Contrary to this claim, when direct and indirect indexes are measured under comparable conditions, an indirect measure based on judgments of perceived duration provides a less sensitive index of perceptual processing than do comparable direct measures. The proposed approach provides a general conceptual/methodological framework for using the dissociation paradigm in studies directed at establishing unconscious processes.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Allan, L. G. (1979). The perception of time.Perception & Psychophysics,26, 340–354.
Avant, L. L., &Lyman, P. J. (1975). Stimulus familiarity modifies perceived duration in prerecognition visual processing.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,1, 205–213.
Avant, L. L., Lyman, P. J., &Antes, J. R. (1975). Effects of stimulus familiarity upon judged visual duration.Perception & Psychophysics,17, 253–262.
Avant, L. L., &Thieman, A. A. (1985). On visual access to letter case and lexical/semantic information.Memory & Cognition,13, 393–404.
Balota, D. A. (1983). Automatic semantic activation and episodic memory.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,22, 88–104.
Bernstein, I. H., Vyas, A., Bissonnette, V., &Barclay, P. (1987). Semantic processing: Subliminal perception or context?Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society,25, 335. (Abstract)
Bonnano, G. A., &Stilling, N. A. (1986). Preference, familiarity, and recognition after repeated brief exposures to random geometric shapes.American Journal of Psychology,99, 403–415.
Bowers, K. S. (1984). On being unconsciously influenced and informed. In K. S. Bowers & D. Meichenbaum (Eds.),The unconscious reconsidered (pp. 227–272). New York: Wiley.
Cheesman, J., &Merikle, P. M. (1984). Priming with and without awareness.Perception & Psychophysics,36, 387–395.
Cheesman, J., &Merikle, P. M. (1985). Word recognition and consciousness. In D. Besner, T. G. Waller, & G. E. MacKinnon (Eds.),Reading research: Advances in theory and practice (Vol. 5, pp. 311–352). New York: Academic Press.
Cheesman, J., &Merikle, P. M. (1986). Distinguishing conscious from unconscious perceptual processes.Canadian Journal of Psychology,40, 343–367.
Craig, J. C. (1973). A constant error in the perception of brief temporal intervals.Perception & Psychophysics,13, 99–104.
Devane, J. R. (1974). Word characteristics and judged duration for two response sequences.Perceptual & Motor Skills,38, 525–526.
Dixon, N. F. (1971).Subliminal perception: The nature of a controversy. London: McGraw-Hill.
Dixon, N. F. (1981).Preconscious processing. Chichester: Wiley.
Dulany, D. E., Jr., &Eriksen, C. W. (1959). Accuracy of brightness discrimination as measured by concurrent verbal responses and GSRs.Journal of Abnormal & Social Psychology,59, 418–423.
Duncan, J. (1985). Two techniques for investigating perception without awareness.Perception & Psychophysics,38, 296–298.
Erdelyi, M. H. (1985).Psychoanalysis: Freud’s cognitive psychology. New York: Freeman.
Erdelyi, M. H. (1986). Experimental indeterminacies in the dissociation paradigm.Behavioral and Brain Sciences,9, 30–31.
Eriksen, C. W. (1956). Subception: Fact or artifact?Psychological Review,63, 71–80.
Eriksen, C. W. (1960). Discrimination and learning without awareness: A methodological survey and evaluation.Psychological Review,67, 279–300.
Fowler, C. A. (1986). An operational definition of conscious awareness must be responsible to subjective experience.Behavioral & Brain Sciences,9, 33–35.
Fowler, C. A., Wolford, G., Slade, R., &Tassinary, L. (1981). Lexical access with and without awareness.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,110, 341–362.
Goldfarb, J. L., &Goldstone, S. (1963). Time judgement: A comparison of filled and unfIlled durations.Perceptual & Motor Skills,16, 376.
Greenwald, A. G., &Liu, T. J. (1985). Limited unconscious processing of meaning.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society,23, 292. (Abstract)
Henley, S. H. A. (1984). Unconscious perception re-revisited: A comment on Merikle’s (1982) paper.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society,22, 121–124.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This research was supported by Grant APA-231 from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada to the second author.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Reingold, E.M., Merikle, P.M. Using direct and indirect measures to study perception without awareness. Perception & Psychophysics 44, 563–575 (1988). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03207490
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03207490