Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Modeling the risk of groundwater contamination using modified DRASTIC and GIS in Amman-Zerqa Basin, Jordan

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Central European Journal of Engineering

Abstract

Amman-Zerqa Basin (AZB) is the second largest groundwater basin in Jordan with the highest abstraction rate, where more than 28% of total abstractions in Jordan come from this basin. In view of the extensive reliance on this basin, contamination of AZB groundwater became an alarming issue. This paper develops a Modified DRASTIC model by combining the generic DRASTIC model with land use activities and lineament density for the study area with a new model map that evaluates pollution potential of groundwater resources in AZB to various types of pollution. It involves the comparison of modified DRASTIC model that integrates nitrate loading along with other DRASTIC parameters. In addition, parameters to account for differences in land use and lineaments density were added to the DRASTIC model to reflect their influences on groundwater pollution potential. The DRASTIC model showed only 0.08% (3 km2) of the AZB is situated in the high vulnerability area and about 30% of the basin is located in the moderately vulnerable zone (mainly in central basin). After modifying the DRASTIC to account for lineament density, about 87% of the area was classified as having low pollution potential and no vulnerability class accounts for about 5.01% of the AZB area. The moderately susceptible zone covers 7.83% of the basin’s total area and the high vulnerability area constitutes 0.13%. The vulnerability map based on land use revealed that about 71% of the study area has low pollution potential and no vulnerability area accounts for about 0.55%, whereas moderate pollution potential zone covers an area of 28.35% and the high vulnerability class constitutes 0.11% of AZB. The final DRASTIC model which combined all DRASTIC models shows that slightly more than 89% of the study area falls under low pollution risk and about 6% is considered areas with no vulnerability. The moderate pollution risk potential covers an area of about 4% of AZB and the high vulnerability class constitutes 0.21% of the basin. The results also showed that an area of about 1761 km2 of bare soils is of low vulnerability, whereas about 28 km2 is moderately vulnerable. For agriculture and the urban sector, approximately 1472 km2 are located within the low vulnerability zone and about 144 km2 are moderately vulnerable, which together account for about 8% of the total agriculture and urban area. These areas are contaminated with human activities, particularly from the agriculture. Management of land use must be considered when changing human or agricultural activity patterns in the study area, to reduce groundwater vulnerability in the basin. The results also showed that the wells with the highest nitrate levels (81–107 mg/l) were located in high vulnerable areas and are attributed to leakage from old sewage water.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Villeneuve J., Banton O. and Lafrance P., A problematic approach for the groundwater vulnerability to contamination by pesticides: the VULPEST model. Ecological Modeling 51, 1990, 47–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Al-Adamant R., Foster I., and Baban S., Groundwater vulnerability and risk mapping for the Basaltic aquifer of the Azraq basin of Jordan using GIS, Remote sensing and DRASTIC, Applied Geography 23(4), 2003, 303–324

    Google Scholar 

  3. El-Naqa A., Aquifer Vulnerability Assessment Using the DRASTIC Model at Russeifa Landfill, Northeast Jordan, Environmental Geology 47(1), 2004, 51–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Al Kuisi M., El-Naqa A. and Hammouri N., Vulnerability mapping of shallow groundwater aquifer using SINTACS model in the Jordan Valley area, Jordan, Environmental Geology 50, 2006, 645–650

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Werz H. and Hötz H., Groundwater Risk Intensity Mapping in Semi-Arid Regions Using Optical Remote Sensing Data as an Additional Tool, Hydrogeology Journal 15(6), 2007, 1031–1049

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Hammouri N. and El-Naqa A., GIS based Hydrogeological Vulnerability Mapping of Groundwater Resources in Jerash Area-Jordan, Geofísica Internacional 47(2), 2008, 85–97

    Google Scholar 

  7. Awawdeh M. and Jaradat R., Evaluation of Aquifers Vulnerability to Contamination in the Yarmouk Basin, Jordan, Based on DRASTIC Method, Jaradat Arabian Journal of Geosciences 3(3), 2010, 273–282

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Al-Rawabdeh A., Al-Ansari N. Al-Taani A., and Knutsson S., A GIS-Based Drastic Model for Assessing Aquifer Vulnerability in Amman-Zerqa Groundwater Basin, Jordan, J. Engineering 5(12), 2013, 490–504

    Google Scholar 

  9. Shirazi S., Imran H., and Akib S., GIS-based DRASTIC method for groundwater vulnerability assessment: A review. Journal of Risk Research 15(8), 2012, 991–1011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Al Hallaq A. and Elaish A., Assessment of aquifer vulnerability to contamination in Khan younis Governorate, Gaza Strip, Palestine, using the DRASTIC model within GIS environment. Arabian Journal of Geosciences 1, 2011, 1–15. doi: 10.1007/s12517-011-0284-9

    Google Scholar 

  11. Shamrukh M., Corapcioglu M., Hassona, A. and Fayek A., Modeling the Effect of Chemical Fertilizers on Ground Water Quality in the Nile Valley Aquifer, Egypt. Ground Water 39 2001, 59–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Al-Hanbali A., and Kondoh A., Groundwater vulnerability assessment and evaluation of human activity impact (HAI) within the Dead Sea groundwater basin, Jordan. Hydrogeology Journal 16(3), 2008, 499–510

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Jasem H., Alraggad M., Assessing Groundwater Vulnerability in Azraq Basin Area by a Modified DRASTIC Index. Water Resource and Protection 2, 2010, 944–951

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. DOS-Department of Statistics, Estimation of population by Governorate, Department of Statistics, Amman, 2004, www.dos.gov.jo/sdb_pop_e/ehsaat/alsokan/1_2004.htm

  15. Awawdeh M. and Nawafleh A., A GIS-based EPIK model for assessing aquifer vulnerability in Irbid Governorate, North Jordan, Jordan Journal of civil Engineering 2(3), 2008

    Google Scholar 

  16. Obeidat M., Ahmad F., Hammouri N., Massadeh F. and Athamneh F., Assessment of nitrate contamination of karst spring, Bani Kanana, northern Jordan. Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Geologicas 25, 2008, 426–437

    Google Scholar 

  17. Lee SR., Lee D. H., Choi S. H., Kim W. Y., Lee S. G., Regional groundwater pollution susceptibility analysis using DRASTICsystem and lineament density. The Eighteen International ESRI User Conference, 1998

    Google Scholar 

  18. Ferreira J. and Oliveira J., DRASTIC groundwater vulnerability mapping of Portugal. In Groundwater: an endangered resource Proceedings of theme C of the 27th Congress of the International Association for Hydraulic Research, San Francisco, USA, 1997, 6

    Google Scholar 

  19. American Public Health Association (APHA), Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 18th edition. Washington, DC: American Public Health Association, 1998

    Google Scholar 

  20. WAJ — Water Authority of Jordan, WAJ Internal Files for Groundwater Basins in Jordan, 2006, http://www.mwi.gov.jo/sites/en-us

    Google Scholar 

  21. MOA — Ministry of Agricultural, The soils of Jordan. National soil map and land use project. Hunting Technical Services Ltd. in association with Soil Survey and Land Research Centre. Vol. 2-level 2, main report. Ministry of Agricultural, Amman, Jordan. 1994

    Google Scholar 

  22. Salameh L., Assessment of land use /cover changes in the Zerqa basin using remote sensing and Markove model, Faculty of graduate studies, University of Jordan, Amman.(unpublished M.Sc. thesis, 2006

    Google Scholar 

  23. MacDonald M. and Partners in Cooperation with Hunting Geological Surveys Limited: East Bank Water Resources, East Bank Water Resources, Vol. 5, Ministry of Water and Irrigation, Amman, 1965, 512

    Google Scholar 

  24. Salameh E. and Udluft P., The Hydrodynamic Pattern of the Central Part of Jordan, Geologisches Jahrbuch Reihe C 38, 1985, 39–55

    Google Scholar 

  25. Bender F., Geology of Jordan, Contributions to the Regional Geology of the Earth, Supplementary Edition of Vol. 7, 196, Berline-Stuttgart (Gebruder Borntraeger), 1974

    Google Scholar 

  26. Al Mahamid J., Integration of Water Resources of the Upper Aquifer in Amman-Zerqa Basin Based on Mathematical Modeling and GIS, Jordan, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Jordan, Amman, 2005

    Google Scholar 

  27. Napolitano P. and Fabbri A., Single-Parameter Sensitivity Analysis for Aquifer Vulnerability Assessment Using DRASTIC and SINTACS, Proceedings of the Vienna conference on Hydro GIS 96: Application of geographic information systems in hydrology and water resources management, IAHS 235, 1996, 559–566.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Aller L., Bennett T., Lehr J. H., Petty R. J. and Hackett G., DRASTIC: A Standardized System for Evaluating Groundwater Pollution Potential Using Hydrogeologic Settings, US Environmental Protection Agency Report 600/2-87/035, US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington DC, 1987

    Google Scholar 

  29. Vrba J. and Zoporozec A., Guidebook on mapping groundwater vulnerability. IAH International Contribution for Hydrogeology 16, 1994, Hannover7, Heise, 131

    Google Scholar 

  30. US EPA (United States Environmental Protection Agency), (Handbook: Groundwater and Wellhead Protection). US EPA Report No. EPA/625/R-94/001, Washington, DC, 1994, 239

    Google Scholar 

  31. Rosen. L., A study of the DRASTIC methodology with emphasis on Swedish conditions, Ground Water 32(2), 1994, 278–285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Babiker M. Mohammed T. Hiyama and Kato K., A GIS-Based DRASTIC Model for Assessing Aquifer Vulnerability in Kakmigahara Heights, Gifu Prefecture, Central Japan, Science of the Total Environmental 3 45(1–3), 2005, 127–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Anwar M., Prem C. and Rao V. B., Evaluation of Groundwater Potential of Musi River Catchment Using DRASTIC Index Model, In: Venkateshwar, B. R. Ram, M. K. Sarala C. S. and Raju, C. (Eds.), Proceedings of the International Conference on Hydrology and Watershed Management, B. S. Publishers, Hyderabad, 2003, 399–409

    Google Scholar 

  34. Chandrashekhar H., Adiga S., Lakshminarayana V., Jagdeesha C. J. and Nataraj, C., A Case Study Using the Model ‘DRASTIC’ for Assessment of Groundwater Pollution Potential, Proceedings of the ISRS National Symposium on Remote Sensing Applications for Natural Resources, Indian Society of Remote Sensing, Bagalore, 19–21 June 1999, 414–417

  35. Dixon B., Groundwater Vulnerability Mapping: A GIS and Fuzzy Rule Based Integrated Tool, Applied Geography, 2005, 25(4), 327–347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Margane M., Management and Protection and Sustainable Use of Groundwater and Soil Resources in the Arab Region, Volume 4: Guideline for Groundwater Vulnerability Mapping and Risk Assessment for Susceptibility of Groundwater Resources to Contamination, Project No. 1996.2189.7, Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development, Bonn, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Shahid S., A Study of Groundwater Pollution Vulnerability Using DRASTIC/GIS, west Bengal, India, Journal of Environmental Hydrology 8(11–12), 2000, 124

    Google Scholar 

  38. Rundquist A., Peters D. Liping Rodekohr D., Ehrman R. and Murray G., State-Wide Groundwater Vulnerability Assessment in Nebraska Using the DRASTIC/GIS Model, Geo-Cartography International 6(2), 1991, 51–58

    Google Scholar 

  39. O’Leary D., Freidman J., and Pohn H., Lineaments, linear, lineation-some proposed new standards for old terms. Geological Society of America Bulletin 87, 1976, 1463–1469

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Lattman H. and Parizek R. Relationship between fracture traces and the occurrence of ground water in carbonate rocks. Journal of Hydrology 2, 1964, 73–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Mabee S. Hardcastle K. and Wise D., A method of collecting and analyzing lineaments for regionalscale fractured-bedrock aquifer studies, Groundwater 32(6), 1994, 884–894

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Hardcastle K., Photolineament factor: a new computer-aided method for remotely sensing the degree to which bedrock is fractured, Photogramm, Eng Remote Sensing 61(6), 1995, 739–747

    Google Scholar 

  43. Magowe M. and Carr R., Relationship between lineaments and ground water occurrence in western Botswana, Ground Water 37(2), 1999, 282–286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Fernandes D. and Rudolph A., The influence of Cenozoic tectonics on the groundwater production capacity of fractured zones: A case study in Sao Paulo, Brazil. Hydrogeology Journal 9, 2001, 151–167

    Google Scholar 

  45. MOCT (Ministry of Construction and Transportation) and KOWACO (Korea Water Resources Corporation), The handbook of drawing and management of hydrogeological map, MOCT, Korea, 1998, 456

    Google Scholar 

  46. Merchant G., GIS-based groundwater pollution hazard assessment: a critical review of the DRASTC model, Photogramm Eng Remote Sensing 60, 1994, 1117–1127

    Google Scholar 

  47. Secunda S., Collin M. and Melloul A. J., Groundwater Vulnerability Assessment Using a Composite Model Combining DRASTIC with Extensive Land Use in Israel’s Sharon Region, Journal of Environmental Management 54(1), 1998, 39–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Chowdany V., Rao N. and Samara P., Decision support framework for assessment of non-point source pollution of groundwater in large irrigation projects, Agric Water Manag 75, 2005, 194–225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Mac Quarrie K., Sudicky E., and Roberston W., Numerical simulation of a fine-grained denitrification layer for removing septic system nitrate from shallow groundwater, J Hydrol 52, 2001, 29–55

    Google Scholar 

  50. Postma D., Boesen C., Kristiansen H. and Larsen F., Nitrate reduction in an unconfined sandy aquifer: water chemistry, reduction processes and geochemical modeling. Water Resource Res 527, 1991, 45–202

    Google Scholar 

  51. Baker L., Introduction to non-point source pollution in the United States and prospects for wetland use, Ecol Eng 1, 1992, 1–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Hubbard R. and Sheridan J., Nitrates in groundwater in the southeastern USA. In; Adriano, D., Iskadar A., Murarka I. editors. Contamination of groundwaters. Northwood, United Kingdom, Science Reviews, 1994, 45–303

    Google Scholar 

  53. Ford M. and Tellam J., Source, type and extent of inorganic contamination within the Birmingham urban aquifer system, UK, J. Hydrol. 156, 1994, 101–135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Lerner D., Yang Y., Barrett M. and Tellam J., Loading of non-agricultural nitrogen in urban groundwater. In: Ellis, J.B. (Ed.), Impacts of urban growth on surface and groundwater quality, IAHS publ. No. 259. IAHS Press, 1999, 117–123

    Google Scholar 

  55. Seiler R., Combined use of 15N and 18O of nitrate and 11B to evaluate nitrate contamination in groundwater, Applied Geochemistry 20, 2005, 1626–1636

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Navarro M. Carbonell, Evaluation of groundwater contamination beneath an urban environment: The Besòs river basin (Barcelona, Spain). Journal of Environmental Management 85, 2007, 259–269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. World Health Organization (WHO), Drinking water quality-water, Background document for preparation of WHO Guidelines for drinking-water quality, Geneva, 4th ed., 2011

    Google Scholar 

  58. Jordanian Drinking Water Standards JS286/1997, http://ocid.nacse.org/rewab/docs/JS286_Drinking_Water_Standards_1997_en.pdf

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Geomatics Engineering, University of Calgary, Alberta, Canada

    Abdulla M. Al-Rawabdeh

  2. Department of Civil, Environmental and Natural Resources and Engineering, Lulea University of Technology, Lulea, Sweden

    Nadhir A. Al-Ansari & Sven Knutsson

  3. Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Science, Yarmouk University, Irbid, 21163, Jordan

    Ahmed A. Al-Taani

  4. Department of Chemistry, University of Calgary, Alberta, Canada

    Fadi L. Al-Khateeb

Authors
  1. Abdulla M. Al-Rawabdeh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Nadhir A. Al-Ansari
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ahmed A. Al-Taani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Fadi L. Al-Khateeb
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Sven Knutsson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nadhir A. Al-Ansari.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Al-Rawabdeh, A.M., Al-Ansari, N.A., Al-Taani, A.A. et al. Modeling the risk of groundwater contamination using modified DRASTIC and GIS in Amman-Zerqa Basin, Jordan. cent.eur.j.eng 4, 264–280 (2014). https://doi.org/10.2478/s13531-013-0163-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/s13531-013-0163-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation