Skip to main content
Log in

Chromatographic Behavior of Uric Acid and Methyl Uric Acids on a Diol Column in HILIC

  • Original
  • Published:
Chromatographia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The retention behavior of uric acid (UA) and methyl uric acids (MUAs) on a diol column in hydrophilic interaction chromatography (HILIC) is presented. The effects of chromatographic parameters such as organic solvent content and salt concentration in the mobile phase, and column temperature were systematically investigated using a design of experiment (DOE). The results of the DOE revealed that the content of organic solvent, acetonitrile (ACN), had the most influence on the retention of the analytes. The effect of salt concentration indicated the possibility of electrostatic repulsion between the negatively charged analytes and the deprotonized residual silanol groups on the surface of the stationary phase. Van’t Hoff plots were constructed to further study the effects of column temperature on the retention of the compounds on the diol phase. Nonlinear van’t Hoff plots were observed for all the analytes in the studied temperature range (0–50 °C) signifying that the retention of UAs and MUAs on the diol column is governed by mixed retention mechanisms. Retention prediction models derived by multiple linear regression (MLR) showed that the retention of the analytes is dependent on the percentage of ACN in the mobile phase and two solute-related descriptors namely ovality (Ov) and the lowest unoccupied molecular orbital (LUMO). The incorporation of Ov, a shape parameter, in the MLR equation signified the importance of the shape/size of the compounds on the observed retention on the diol phase.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Diel DM, Grumbach ES, Mazzeo JR, Neue UD (2003) Paper no. 800-5. In: Pittcon 2003, 9–14 March 2003, Orlando, FL

  2. Gustavasson SA, Samskog J, Markides KE, Langstrom B (2001) J Chromatogr A 937:41–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Voyksner RD (1997) Combining liquid chromatography with electrospray mass spectrometry. In: Cole RB (ed) Electrospray ionization mass spectrometry. Wiley, Hoboken

    Google Scholar 

  4. Naidong W, Shou W, Chen YL, Jiang X (2001) J Chromatogr B 754:387–399

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Alpert AJ (1990) J Chromatogr 449:177–196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Hemstrom P, Irgum K (2006) J Sep Sci 29:1784–1821

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Naidong W (2003) J Chromatogr B 796:209–224

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Bajad SU, Lu W, Kimball EH, Yuan J, Peterson C, Rabinowitz JD (2006) J Chromatogr A 1125:76:88

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Gavin PF, Olsen BA, Wirth DD, Lorenz KT (2006) J Pharm Biomed Anal 41:1251–1259

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Risley DS, Yang WQ, Peterson JA (2006) J Sep Sci 29:256–264

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Wang X, Li W, Rasmussen HT (2005) J Chromatogr A 1083:58–62

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Ciminiello P, Dell’Aversano C, Fattorusso E, Forino M, Martino M, Magno S, Santelia F, Tsoukatou M (2006) Toxicon 47:174–181

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Dell’Aversano C, Hess P, Quilliam MA (2005) J Chromatogr A 1081:190–201

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Schlichtherle-Cerny H, Affloter M, Cerny C (2004) Food Sci Tech 131:363–378

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Xue YJ, Liu J, Unger S (2006) J Pharm Biomed Anal 41:979–988

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Schilichtherle-Cerny H, Affloter M, Cerny C (2003) Anal Chem 75:2349–2354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Li AC, Chen YL, Junga H, Shou WZ, Jiang X, Naidong W (2003) Chromatographia 58:723–731

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Hiseh Y, Chen J (2005) Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom 19:3031–3036

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Appelblad P, Abrahamsson P (2005) In: The application book March 2005 LC-GC Europe, pp 47–48

  20. Delinsky AD, Delinsky DC, Muralidhara S, Fisher JW, Bruckner JV, Bartlett MG (2005) Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom 19:1075–1083

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Guo Y, Gaiki S (2005) J Chromatogr A 1074:71–80

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Guo Y, Srinivasan S, Gaiki S (2007) Chromatographia 66:223–229

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Popa E, Kubota Y, Tryk DA, Fujishima A (2000) Anal Chem 72:1724–1727

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Zen JM, Jou JJ, Ilangovan G (1998) Analyst 123:1345–1350

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Dobson A (1999) Lancet 354:1578

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Inoue K, Namiki T, Iwasaki Y, Yoshimura Y, Nakazawa H (2003) J Chromatogr B 785:57–63

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Safranow K, Machoy Z, Ciechanowski K (2000) Anal Biochem 286:224–230

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Safranow K, Machoy Z (2005) J Chromatogr B 819:229–235

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Case LC, Ling GV, Ruby AL, Johnson DL, Franti CE, Stevens F (1993) J Am Vet Med Assoc 203:96–100

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Ling GV, Ruby AL, Harrold DR, Johnson DL (1991) J Am Vet Med Assoc 198:1935–1940

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Jung P, Becht E, Ziegler M, Bommert R, Bach K, Haas HJ (1988) Eur Urol 14:493–497

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Novotna K, Havlis J, Havel J (2005) J Chromatogr A 1096:50–57

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Scott RPW (1982) Adv Chromatogr 20:169–175

    Google Scholar 

  34. Bidlingmeyer B, Henderson J (2004) J Chromatogr A 1060:187–193

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Dong L, Huang J (2007) Chromatographia 65:519–526

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Sentel KB, Henderson AN (1991) Anal Chim Acta 246:136–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Melander WR, Stoveke J, Horvath Cs (1979) J Chromatogr 185:111–128

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Melander WR, Nahum A, Horvath Cs (1979) J Chromatogr 185:129–152

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Nahum A, Horvath Cs (1981) J Chromatogr 203:53–63

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Dungelova J, Lehotay J, Krupcik J, Cizmarik J, Armstrong DW (2004) J Sep Sci 27:983–990

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Kaliszan R (1997) Structure and retention in chromatography. A chemometric approach. Harwood, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  42. Kaliszan R (1993) J Chromatogr 656:417–435

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Nasal A, Sznitowska M, Bucinski A, Kaliszan R (1995) J Chromatogr 692:83–89

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Quiming NS, Denola NL, Ueta I, Saito Y, Tatematsu S, Jinno K (2007) Anal Chim Acta 598:41–50

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Quiming NS, Denola NL, Saito Y, Jinno K (2007) Anal Bioanal Chem 388:1693–1706

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Quiming NS, Denola NL, Soliev AB, Saito Y, Jinno K (2007) Anal Bioanal Chem 389:1477–1488

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Bodor N, Gabanyi Z, Wong CK (1989) J Am Chem Soc 111:3783–3786

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Bodor N, Buchwald P (1997) J Phys Chem B 101:3404–3412

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Huang F, Buchwald P, Browne CE, Farag HH, Wu WM, Ji F, Hochhaus G, Bodor N (2001) AAPS PharmSci 3:E30

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kiyokatsu Jinno.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Quiming, N.S., Denola, N.L., Saito, Y. et al. Chromatographic Behavior of Uric Acid and Methyl Uric Acids on a Diol Column in HILIC. Chroma 67, 507–515 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1365/s10337-008-0559-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1365/s10337-008-0559-9

Keywords

Navigation