Abstract
Background
Whereas the impact of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the breast on the surgical management of breast cancer patients is well documented, less is known about its effect on health care costs. This study aimed to evaluate whether MRI use for women with invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) significantly changes the cost of care.
Methods
Patients with ILC were recruited to a prospective registry study of breast MRI. Women who met the same inclusion criteria but had not undergone breast MRI were retrospectively identified for comparison. A micro-costing analysis using institutional billing records was conducted. Nonparametric bootstrapping was used to compare the unadjusted cost differences between the patients receiving MRI and those receiving no MRI.
Results
Of the patients in this study, 51 had preoperative MRI, and 60 did not. Method of diagnostic biopsy, disease stage, oncologic procedure, and rates of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy were similar between the two groups. The patients in the MRI group were younger (median age 55 vs. 64 years; p = 0.01) and more likely to undergo reconstruction (45.1 vs. 25 %; p = 0.03). The median costs of care were significantly higher in the MRI group ($24,781 vs. $18,921; p < 0.01). After adjustment for clinical factors, MRI remained significantly associated with increased cost (p = 0.03). Other factors associated with increased cost included type of oncologic procedure (mastectomy vs. lumpectomy; p < 0.01), number of operations required to achieve negative margins (1 vs. >1; p < 0.01), and use of reconstruction (p < 0.01).
Conclusion
Preoperative breast MRI increases the median total cost of care per patient. However, the contribution to the overall cost of care is modest compared with the cost of other interventions.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Houssami N, Ciatto S, Macaskill P, Lord SJ, Warren RM, et al. Accuracy and surgical impact of magnetic resonance imaging in breast cancer staging: systematic review and meta-analysis in detection of multifocal and multicentric cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:3248–58. 10.1200/JCO.2007.15.2108.
Lehman CD, Gatsonis C, Kuhl CK, Hendrick RE, Pisano ED, et al. MRI evaluation of the contralateral breast in women with recently diagnosed breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2007;356:1295–303.
Esserman L, Hylton N, Yassa L, Barclay J, Frankel S, Sickles E. Utility of magnetic resonance imaging in the management of breast cancer: evidence for improved preoperative staging. J Clin Oncol. 1999;17:110–9.
Turnbull L, Brown S, Harvey I, Olivier C, Drew P, et al. Comparative effectiveness of MRI in breast cancer (COMICE) trial: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2010;375:563–71. 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)62070-5.
Katipamula R, Degnim AC, Hoskin T, Boughey JC, Loprinzi C, et al. Trends in mastectomy rates at the Mayo Clinic Rochester: effect of surgical year and preoperative magnetic resonance imaging. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:4082–8. 10.1200/JCO.2008.19.4225.
Bleicher RJ, Ciocca RM, Egleston BL, Sesa L, Evers K, et al. Association of routine pretreatment magnetic resonance imaging with time to surgery, mastectomy rate, and margin status. J Am Coll Surg. 2009;209:180–7. 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2009.04.010.
Frick KD. Microcosting quantity data collection methods. Med Care. 2009;47:S76–81. 10.1097/MLR.0b013e31819bc064.
Doshi JA, Glick HA, Polsky D. Analyses of cost data in economic evaluations conducted alongside randomized controlled trials. Value Health. 2006;9:334–40. 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2006.00122.x.
Abdel-Rahman S, Le-Petross H, Whitman G, Meric-Bernstam F, Babiera G, et al. Paper presented at the society of surgical oncology 64th annual cancer symposiun, San, Antonio, 2011.
Pengel KE, Loo CE, Teertstra HJ, Muller SH, Wesseling J, Peterse JL, et al. The impact of preoperative MRI on breast-conserving surgery of invasive cancer: a comparative cohort study. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2009;116:161–9. 10.1007/s10549-008-0182-3.
Parker A, Schroen AT, Brenin DR. MRI utilization in newly diagnosed breast cancer: a survey of practicing surgeons. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013;20:2600–6. 10.1245/s10434-013-2934-5.
Stout NK, Nekhlyudov L, Li L, Malin ES, Ross-Degnan D, et al. Rapid increase in breast magnetic resonance imaging use: trends from 2000 to 2011. JAMA Intern Med. 2014;174:114–21. 10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.11958.
Wernli KJ, DeMartini WB, Ichikawa L, Lehman CD, Onega T, et al. Breast cancer surveillance: patterns of breast magnetic resonance imaging use in community practice. JAMA Intern Med. 2014;174:125–32. 10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.11963.
Kneeshaw PJ, Turnbull LW, Smith A, Drew PJ. Dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging aids the surgical management of invasive lobular breast cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2003;29:32–7.
Bedrosian I, Mick R, Orel S, Schnall M, Reynolds C, et al. Changes in the surgical management of patients with breast carcinoma based on preoperative magnetic resonance imaging. Cancer. 2003;98:468–73.
Schelfout K, Van Goethem M, Kersschot E, Verslegers I, Biltjes I, et al. Preoperative breast MRI in patients with invasive lobular breast cancer. Eur Radiol. 2004;14:1209–16.
Conflict of interest
Isabelle Bedrosian serves on the Bayer Breast MRI Advisory Board.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bedrosian, I., Xing, Y., Abdel Rahman, S. et al. A Cost Analysis of Preoperative Breast MRI Use for Patients with Invasive Lobular Cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 23, 23–29 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-015-4710-1
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-015-4710-1