Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Preoperative breast MRI in patients with invasive lobular breast cancer

  • Breast
  • Published:
European Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To investigate the use of MRI in preoperative characterization of invasive lobular breast cancer (ILC) and in detection of multifocal/multicentric disease. We retrospectively reviewed T1-weighted FLASH 3D precontrast and postcontrast MR images together with subtraction images of 26 women with histopathologically proven invasive lobular cancer. Two experienced radiologists described tumor patterns of ILC independently. MR findings of unifocal, multifocal, single quadrant and multiquadrant disease were correlated with results of other imaging techniques and compared with histopathological findings as gold standard. Most ILC presented on MRI as a single spiculated/irregular, inhomogeneous mass (pattern 1, n=12) or as a dominant lesion surrounded by multiple small enhancing foci (pattern 2, n=8). Multiple small enhancing foci with interconnecting enhancing strands (pattern 3) and an architectural distortion (pattern 4) were both described in three cases. There was one case of a focal area of inhomogeneous enhancement (pattern 5) and one normal MR examination (pattern 6). Unifocal and multifocal lesions were identified on MRI in four patients with normal conventional imaging. In nine women, multiple additional lesions or more extensive multiquadrant disease were correctly identified only on MRI. MRI may play an important role in the evaluation of patients with ILC, which is often difficult to diagnose on clinical examination and conventional imaging and more likely occur in multiple sites and in both breasts. However, false-negative MR findings do occur in a small percentage of ILC.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Weinstein SP, Orel SG, Heller R, Reynolds C, Czerniecki B, Solin LJ, Schnall M (2001) MR Imaging of the breast in patients with invasive lobular carcinoma. Am J Roentgenol 176:399–406

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Mendelson EB, Harris KM, Doshu N, Tobon H (1989) Infiltrating lobular carcinoma: mammographic patterns with pathologic correlation. Am J Roentgenol 153:265–271

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Yeh C, Titus JM, Kalisher L (1997) Breast imaging case of the day. Infiltrating lobular carcinoma. Radiographics 17:1328–1332

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Fechner RE (1975) Histologic variants of infiltrating lobular carcinoma of the breast. Hum Pathol 6:373–378

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Framarino Dei Malatesta M, Fiorelli C, Bandiera AF, Veneziano M, Galati GM, Porfiri L (1995) Infiltrating lobular carcinoma of the breast (ILC). Eur J Gynaec Oncol 1:36–39

    Google Scholar 

  6. Skaane P, Skjorten F (1999) Ultrasonographic evaluation of invasive lobular carcinoma. ACTA Radiol 40:369–375

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Evans N, Lyons K (2000) The use of ultrasound in the diagnosis of invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast less than 10 mm in size. Clin Radiol 55:261–263

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Butler RS, Venta LA, Wiley EL, Ellis RL, Dempsey PJ, Rubin E (1999) Sonographic evaluation of infiltrating lobular carcinoma. Am J Roentgenol 172:325–330

    Google Scholar 

  9. Foote FW Jr, Stewart FW (1941) Lobular carcinoma in situ: a rare form of mammary cancer. Am J Pathol 17:491–496

    Google Scholar 

  10. Quayyum A, Birdwell RL, Daniel BL, Nowels KW, Jeffrey SS, Agoston TA, Herfkens RJ (2002) MR Imaging features of infiltrating lobular carcinoma of the breast: histopatholgic correlation. Am J Roentgenol 178:1227–1232

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hilleren DJ, Andersson IT, Lindholm K, Linell FS (1991) Invasive lobular carcinoma: mammographic findings in a 10-year experience. Radiology 178:149–154

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Sickles EA (1991) The subtle and atypical mammographic features of invasive lobular carcinoma. Radiology 178:25–26

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Watson L (2001) Breast cancer: diagnosis, treatment and prognosis. Radiol Technol 73:45–61

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Le Gal M, Ollivier L, Asselain B et al (1992) Mammographic features of 455 invasive carcinomas. Radiology 185:705–708

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Rodenko GN, Harms SE, Pruneda JM, Farell RS, Evans WP, Copit DS, Krakos PA, Flamig DP (1996) MR Imaging in the management before surgery of lobular carcinoma of the breast: correlation with pathology. Am J Roentgenol 167:1415–1419

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Sadler GP, McGee S, Dallimore NS, Monypenny IJ, Douglas-Jones AG, Lyons K, Horgan K (1994) Role of fine-needle aspiration cytology and needle-core biopsy in the diagnosis of lobular carcinoma of the breast. Br J Surg 81:1315–1317

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Lesser ML, Rosen PP, Kinne DW (1982) Multicentricity and bilaterality in invasive carcinoma. Surgery 91:234–240

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Dixon JM, Anderson TJ, Page DL, Lee D, Duffy SW, Stewart HJ (1983) Infiltrating lobular carcinoma of the breast: an evaluation of the incidence and consequence of bilateral disease. Br J Surg 70:513–516

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Boetes C, Mus RDM, Holland R, Barentsz JO, Strijk SP, Wobbes T, Hendriks JHCL, Ruys SHJ (1995) Breast tumors: comparative accuracy of MR imaging relative to mammography and US for demonstrating extent. Radiology 197:743–747

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Mumtaz H, Hall-Craggs MA, Davidson T et al (1997) Staging of symptomatic primary breast cancer with MR imaging. Am J Roentgenol 169:417–424

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Orel SG, Schnall MD (2001) MR imaging of the breast for the detection, diagnosis, and staging of breast cancer. Radiology 220:13–30

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Boetes C, Strijk SP, Holland R, Barentsz JO, Van Der Sluis RE, Ruijs JHJ (1997) False-negative MR imaging of malignant breast tumors. Eur Radiol 7:1231–1234

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Harms SE, Flamig DP, Hesley KL et al (1993) MR imaging of the breast with rotating delivery of excitation off resonance: clinical experience with pathologic correlation. Radiology 187:493–501 (abstract)

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Orel SG, Schnall MD, LiVolsi VA, Troupon RH (1994) Suspicious breast lesions: MR imaging with radiologic–patholgic correlation. Radiology 190:485–493 (abstract)

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Kim SJ, Morris EA, Liberman L, Ballon DJ, La Trenta LR, Hadar O, Abramson A, Dershaw DD (2001) Observer variability and application of BI-RADS terminology for breast MR Imaging. Am J Roentgenol 177:551–557

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. American College of Radiology (ACR) (1998) Illustrated breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS), 3rd edn. American college of Radiology, Reston, VA

  27. Cohen J (1960) A coefficient of agreement for normal scales. Educ Psych Meas 20:37–46

    Google Scholar 

  28. Cornford EJ, Wilson ARM, Athanassiou E et al (1995) Mammographic features of invasive lobular and invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast: a comparative analysis. Br J Radiol 68:450–453

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Holland R, Hendriks JH, Mravunac M (1983) Mammographically occult breast cancer. Cancer 52:1810–1819

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Dronkers DS (1985) Mammografisch occult mammacarcinoom. Ned Tijdschr Geneesk 129:1632–1635

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Martin JE, Moskowitz M, Milbrath JR (1979) Breast cancer missed by mammography. Am J Roentgenol 132:737–739

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Beute BJ, Kalisher L, Hutter RV (1991) Lobular carcinoma in situ of the breast: clinical, pathologic, and mammographic features. Am J Roentgenol 157:257–265

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Chintana PP, Helvie MA, Adler DD (1995) Invasive lobular carcinoma: sonographic appearance and role of sonography in improving diagnostic sensitivity. Radiology 195:231–234

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Nokes SR, Pierce W, Abraham DC, Harms SE (1999) Radiology, infiltrating lobular carcinoma. J Ark Med Soc 96:176–177

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Harms SE (1998) Integration of breast magnetic resonance imaging with breast cancer treatment. Top Magn Reson Imaging 9:79–91

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Orel SG, Schnall MD, Powell CM et al (1995) Staging of suspected breast cancer: effect of MR imaging and MR-guided biopsy. Radiology 196:115–122

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Cooney BS, Orel SG, Schnall MD, Troupin RH (1994) Invasive lobular carcinoma in a patient with synchronous ductal carcinoma in situ: detection with MR imaging. Am J Roentgenol 162:1318–1320

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Esserman L, Hylton N, Yassa L et al (1999) Utility of magnetic resonance imaging in the management of breast cancer: evidence for improved preoperative staging. J Clin Oncol 17:110–119

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Fischer U, Kopka L, Grabbe E (1999) Breast carcinoma: effect of preoperative contrast-enhanced MR imaging on the therapeutic approach. Radiology 213:881–888

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Davis PL, McCarty KS Jr (1998) Magnetic resonance imaging in breast cancer staging. Top Magn Reson Imaging 9:60–75

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Orel SG, Weinstein SP, Schnall MD (1999) Breast MR imaging in patients with axillary node metastases and unknown primary malignancy. Radiology 212:543–549

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Wilhem K, Grebe P, Teifke A, Halbsguth A, Mitze Thelen M (1992) Das lobuläre Mammakarzinom in der Kerspintomographie. Akt Radiol 2:373

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Pathology, University Hospital Antwerp, Wilrijkstraat 10, 2650, Edegem, Belgium

    K. Schelfout & C. Colpaert

  2. Department of Radiology, University Hospital Antwerp, Wilrijkstraat 10, 2650, Edegem, Belgium

    M. Van Goethem, I. Verslegers, I. Biltjes & A. De Schepper

  3. Department of Radiology, O.L.V. Hospital Aalst, Moorselbaan 164, 9000, Aalst, Belgium

    E. Kersschot & P. Leyman

  4. Department of Pathology, O.L.V. Hospital Aalst, Moorselbaan 164, 9000, Aalst, Belgium

    L. Thienpont

  5. Department of Gynecology, O.L.V. Hospital Aalst, Moorselbaan 164, 9000, Aalst, Belgium

    J. Van den Haute

  6. Department of Surgery, O.L.V. Hospital Aalst, Moorselbaan 164, 9000, Aalst, Belgium

    J. P. Gillardin

  7. Department of Gynecology, University Hospital Antwerp, Wilrijkstraat 10, 2650, Edegem, Belgium

    W. Tjalma & Ph. Buytaert

Authors
  1. K. Schelfout
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. M. Van Goethem
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. E. Kersschot
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. I. Verslegers
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. I. Biltjes
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. P. Leyman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. C. Colpaert
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. L. Thienpont
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. J. Van den Haute
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. J. P. Gillardin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. W. Tjalma
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Ph. Buytaert
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. A. De Schepper
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to K. Schelfout.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schelfout, K., Van Goethem, M., Kersschot, E. et al. Preoperative breast MRI in patients with invasive lobular breast cancer. Eur Radiol 14, 1209–1216 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-004-2275-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-004-2275-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation