Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Modified Pleural Tenting for Prevention of Anastomotic Leak After Ivor Lewis Esophagogastrectomy

  • Thoracic Oncology
  • Published:
Annals of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The most dangerous complication following esophagogastrectomy for esophageal cancer is anastomotic leakage. Surgical interventions described did not have a major impact in reducing the risk of occurrence. On the other hand, pleural tenting has been used for more than a decade by thoracic surgeons to prevent prolonged air leak after formal upper lobectomy with excellent results.

Methods

A retrospective analysis of 114 cases of esophagogastrectomy for cancer of esophagus or cardioesophageal junction is presented. Patients have been divided in 2 groups. In group B modified pleural tenting was used to prevent a potential anastomotic leak, while in group A, the control group, pleural tenting was not used. Evaluation of modified pleural tenting in preventing anastomotic leakage was the aim of the study.

Results

The pleural tenting group showed a significant decrease in anastomotic leak. In 1 patient versus 8 in group without pleural tenting the complication appeared (P = .032). The risk for an anastomotic leakage in group without pleural tenting was almost 9 times greater (odds ratio: 9.143, 95% confidence interval: lower bound 1.104, upper bound 75.708). The 30-day mortality, although lower in pleural tenting group, was not statistically significant.

Conclusions

Pleural tenting is a safe, fast, and effective technique for prevention of anastomotic leakage after Ivor Lewis esophagogastrectomy. Subpleural blanketing of intrathoracic anastomosis could diminish the consequences of a possible anastomotic leak.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Junemann-Ramirez M, Awan MY, Khan ZM, Rahamim JS. Anastomotic leakage post-esophagogastrectomy for esophageal carcinoma: retrospective analysis of predictive factors, management and influence on longterm survival in a high volume centre. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2005;27:3–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Whooley BP, Law S, Alexandrou A, Murthy SC, Wong J. Critical appraisal of the significance of intrathoracic anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy for cancer. Am J Surg. 2001;181:198–203.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Peracchia A, Bardini R, Ruol A, Asolati M, Scibetta D. Esophagovisceral anastomotic leak: a prospective statistical study of predisposing factors. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1988;95:685–91.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Sharma D. Esophageal replacement by gastric transposition. IJS. 2000;62:97–112.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Allama AM. Pleural tent for decreasing air leak following upper lobectomy: a prospective randomized trial. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2010;38:674–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Okur E, Kir A, Halezeroglu S, Alpay AL, Atasalihi A. Pleural tenting following upper lobectomies or bilobectomies of the lung to prevent residual air space and prolonged air leak. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2001;20:1012–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Brunelli A, Al Refai M, Muti M, Sabbatini A, Fianchini A. Pleural tent after upper lobectomy: a prospective randomized study. Ann Thorac Surg. 2000;69:1722–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Wang GQ, Jiao GG, Chang FB, Fang WH, Song JX, Lu N, et al. Long-term results of operation for 420 patients with early squamous cell esophageal carcinoma discovered by screening. Ann Thorac Surg. 2004;77:1740–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Hulscher JB, Tijssen JG, Obertop H, van Lanschot JJ. Transthoracic versus transhiatal resection for carcinoma of the esophagus: a meta-analysis. Ann Thorac Surg. 2001;72:306–13.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Karl RC, Schreiber R, Boulware D, Baker S, Coppola D. Factors affecting morbidity, mortality and survival in patients undergoing Ivor Lewis esophagogastrectomy. Ann Surg. 2000;231:635–43.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Voros A, Ender F, Jakkel T, Cserepes E, Tóta J, Szántó I, et al. Esophageal anastomosis-based on the experience with 1460 operations. Magy Seb. 2001;54:132–7 (in Hungarian).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Alanezi K, Urschel J. Mortality secondary to esophageal anastomotic leak. Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2004;10:71–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Gockel I, Exner C, Junginger T. Morbidity and mortality after esophagectomy for esophageal carcinoma: a risk analysis. World J Surg Oncol. 2005;3:37.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Steyerberg E, Neville B, Koppert L, Lemmens VE, Tilanus HW, Coebergh JW, et al. Surgical mortality in patients with esophageal cancer: development and validation of a simple risk score. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24:4277–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Fekete F, Breil P, Ronsse H, Tossen JC, Langonnet F. EEA stapler and omental graft in esophagogastrectomy: experience with 30 intrathoracic anastomoses for cancer. Ann Surg. 1981;193:825–30.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Pennathur A, Luketich JD. Resection for esophageal cancer: strategies for optimal management. Ann Thorac Surg. 2008;85:S751–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Tsai WS, Levy RM, Luketich JD. Technique of minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy. Oper Tech Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2009;14:176–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Safranek PM, Cubitt J, Booth MI, Dehn TC. Review of open and minimal access approaches to oesophagectomy for cancer. Br J Surg. 2010;97:1845–53.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Bhat MA, Dar MA, Lone GN, Dar AM. Use of pedicled omentum in esophagogastric anastomosis for prevention of anastomotic leak. Ann Thorac Surg. 2006;82:1857–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Tilanus HW, Hop WC, Langenhorst BL, van Lanschot JJ. Esophagectomy with or without thoracotomy. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1993;105:98–103.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Chassot G, Robert J, Murith N, Spiliopoulos A. Protection of intrathoracic anastomosis by pleural tent methods after Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy. J Chir (Paris). 1997;134:432–5.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

The authors would like to thank Mrs. Kyriaki Zafiriadou for her valuable help in language editing.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christos Asteriou MD, MSc.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Asteriou, C., Barbetakis, N., Lalountas, M. et al. Modified Pleural Tenting for Prevention of Anastomotic Leak After Ivor Lewis Esophagogastrectomy. Ann Surg Oncol 18, 3737–3742 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-011-1835-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-011-1835-8

Keywords

Navigation