How should modern people evaluate Feynman diagrams? This question has been receiving considerable attention in recent years. While the current answer is far from being complete, one can select several attack directions under development. One of such directions is the differential equations method. We attempt to review some of its features and outline the ideas that could help establish a more general framework.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
A. V. Kotikov, in Antidifferentiation and the Calculation of Feynman Amplitudes (Springer Nature, Cham, Switzerland, 2021), Vol. 2; arXiv: 2102.07424 [hep-ph].
R. N. Lee and A. A. Pomeransky, J. High Energy Phys. 11, 165 (2013); arxiv: 1308.6676 [hep-ph].
S. Müller-Stach, S. Weinzierl, and R. Zayadeh, Commun. Math. Phys. 326, 237 (2014); arXiv: 1212.4389 [hep-ph].
A. Mironov and A. Morozov, Phys. Lett. B 252, 47 (1990).
A. Morozov, Phys. Usp. 37, 1 (1994).
E. Panzer, PhD Thesis (Humboldt Univ., Berlin, 2015); arXiv: 1506.07243 [math-ph].
G. ‘t Hooft and M. J. G. Veltman, Nucl. Phys. B 153, 365 (1979).
J. Broedel, C. Duhr, F. Dulat, B. Penante, and L. Tancredi, J. High Energy Phys., No. 05, 120 (2019); arXiv: 1902.09971 [hep-ph].
J. Broedel, C. Duhr, F. Dulat, and L. Tancredi, J. High Energy Phys., No. 05, 093 (2018); arXiv: 1712.07089 [hep-th].
S. Weinzierl, in Antidifferentiation and the Calculation of Feynman Amplitudes (Springer Nature, Cham, Switzerland, 2020), Vol. 12; arXiv: 2012.08429 [hep-th].
J. L. Bourjaily, A. J. McLeod, M. von Hippel, and M. Wilhelm, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 031601 (2019); arXiv: 1810.07689 [hep-th].
K. Bönisch, C. Duhr, F. Fischbach, A. Klemm, and C. Nega, arXiv: 2108.05310 [hep-th].
M. Caffo, H. Czyz, S. Laporta, and E. Remiddi, Nuovo Cim. A 111, 365 (1998); arXiv: hep-th/9805118.
S. Laporta and E. Remiddi, Nucl. Phys. B 704, 349 (2005); arXiv: hep-ph/0406160.
L. Adams, C. Bogner, and S. Weinzierl, PoS(RADCOR 2015), 096 (2016); arXiv: 1601.03646 [hep-ph].
C. Duhr, in Journeys through the Precision Frontier: Amplitudes for Colliders, Proceedings of the 2014 Theoretical Advanced Study Institute in Elementary Particle Physics (World Scientific, Singapore, 2015), p. 419; arXiv: 1411.7538 [hep-ph].
C. Duhr and F. Dulat, J. High Energy Phys., No. 08, 135 (2019); arXiv: 1904.07279 [hep-th].
A. B. Goncharov, M. Spradlin, C. Vergu, and A. Vo-lovich, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 151605 (2010); arXiv: 1006.5703 [hep-th].
A. Gerasimov, A. Morozov, and K. Selivanov, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 16, 1531 (2001); arXiv: hep-th/0005053.
A. Morozov, AIP Conf. Proc. 1562, 167 (2013).
A. Connes and D. Kreimer, Commun. Math. Phys. 199, 203 (1998); arXiv: hep-th/9808042.
S. L. Cacciatori, M. Conti, and S. Trevisan, Universe 7 (9), 328 (2021); arXiv: 2107.14721 [hep-th].
S. Chmutov, M. Kazarian, and S. Lando, Sel. Math. 26 (3), 1 (2020).
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We are grateful to A. Morozov for suggesting to think on these problems and for helpful comments and to the participants of the ITEP/MIPT working seminar for stimulating discussions.
Funding
Victor Mishnyakov acknowledges the partial support of the Russian Foundation for Basic Research (RFBR, project no. 20-01-006440) and of the Ministry of Science and Technology of Taiwan (joint project no. 21-52-52004 with RFBR).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mishnyakov, V., Suprun, P. Outlook on Differential Equations for Feynman Integrals (Brief Review). Jetp Lett. 115, 477–483 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0021364022100447
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0021364022100447