Skip to main content
Log in

Abstract

Quantitative characterization of skin appearance is an important but difficult task. The skin surface is a detailed landscape, with complex geometry and local optical properties. In addition, skin features depend on many variables such as body location (e.g. forehead, cheek), subject parameters (age, gender) and imaging parameters (lighting, camera). As with many real world surfaces, skin appearance is strongly affected by the direction from which it is viewed and illuminated. Computational modeling of skin texture has potential uses in many applications including realistic rendering for computer graphics, robust face models for computer vision, computer-assisted diagnosis for dermatology, topical drug efficacy testing for the pharmaceutical industry and quantitative comparison for consumer products. In this work we present models and measurements of skin texture with an emphasis on faces. We develop two models for use in skin texture recognition. Both models are image-based representations of skin appearance that are suitably descriptive without the need for prohibitively complex physics-based skin models. Our models take into account the varied appearance of the skin with changes in illumination and viewing direction. We also present a new face texture database comprised of more than 2400 images corresponding to 20 human faces, 4 locations on each face (forehead, cheek, chin and nose) and 32 combinations of imaging angles. The complete database is made publicly available for further research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aksoy, S. and Haralick, R.M. 1999. Graph-theoretic clustering for image grouping and retrieval. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, vol. 1, pp. 63–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blanz, V. and Vetter, T. 1999. A morphable model for the synthesis of 3D faces. In Proceedings of SIGGRAPl, pp. 187–194.

  • Boissieux, L., Kiss, G., Thalman N., and Kalra, P. 2000. Simulation of skin aging and wrinkles with cosmetics insight. In Eurographics Workshop on Animation and Simulation (EGCAS 2000), pp. 15–28.

  • Bovik, A.C., Clark, M., and Geisler, W.S. 1990. Multichannel texture analysis using localized spatial filters. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 12.

  • Chantler, M. 1995. Why illuminant direction is fundamental to texture analysis. IEE Proceedings Vision, Image and Signal Processing, 142(4):199–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cula, O.G. and Dana, K.J. 2001a. Compact representation of bidirectional texture functions. In Proceedings of the IEE’E Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, vol. I pp. 1041–1047.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cula, O.G. and Dana, K.J. 2001b. Recognition methods for 3D textured surfaces. In Proceedings of SPIE Conference on Human Vision and Electronic Imaging VI, vol. 4299, pp. 209–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cula, O.G. and Dana, K.J. 2002. Image-based skin analysis. In Proceedings of Texture 2002-The 2nd International Workshop on texture Analysis and Synthesis, pp. 35–40.

  • Cula, O.G. and Dana, K.J. 2003. 3D texture recognition using bidirectional feature histograms. International Journal of Computer Vision (to appear in).

  • Cula, O.G., Dana, K.J., Murphy, F.P., and Rao, B.K. 2003. http://www. caip.rutgers.edu/rutgers_texture.

  • Dana, K.J. and Nayar, S.K. 1998. Histogram model for 3D textures. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Wision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 618–624.

  • Dana, K.J. and Nayar, S.K. 1999a. 3D textured surface modeling. In IEEE Workshop on the Integration of Appearance and Geometric Methods in Object Recognition, pp. 46–56.

  • Dana, K.J. and Nayar, S.K. 1999b. Correlation model for 3D texture. In International Conference on Computer Vision, pp. 1061–1067.

  • Dana, K.J., van Ginneken, B., Nayar, S.K., and Koenderink, J.J. 1997. Reflectance and texture of real world surfaces. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 151–157.

  • Dana, K.J., van Ginneken, B., Nayar, S.K., and Koenderink, J.J. 1999. Reflectance and texture of real world surfaces. ACM Transactions on Graphics, 18(1):1–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeCarlo, D., Metaxas, D., and Stone, M. 1998. An anthropometric face model using variational techniques. In Proceedings of SIGGRAPH, pp. 67–74.

  • Dong, J. and Chantler, M. 2002. Capture and synthesis of 3D surface texture. In Proceedings of texture 2002-The 2nd International Workshop on Texture Analysis and Synthesis, pp. 41–46.

  • Guenter, B., Grimm, C., Wood, D., Malvar, H., and Pighin, F. 1998. Making faces. In Proceedings of SIGGRAPI, pp. 55–66.

  • Ishii, T., Yasuda, T., Yokoi, S., and Toriwaki, J. 1993. A generation model for human skin texture. Communicating with Virtual Worlds, pp. 139–150.

  • Jain, A., Prabhaklar, S., and Hong, L. 1999. A multichannel approach to fingerprint classification. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 21(4):348–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Julesz, B. 1981. Textons, the elements of texture perception and their interactions. Nature, (290):91–97.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Koenderink, J.J. and van Doomn, A.J. 1996. Illuminance texture due to surface mesostucture. Journal of the Optical Society ofAmerica A, 13(3):452–463.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koenderink, J.J., van Doorn, A.J., Dana, K.J., and Nayar, S.K. 1999. Bidirectional reflection distribution function of thoroughly pitted surfaces. International Journal of Computer Vision, 31(2/3):129–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, Y., Terzopoulos, D., and Walters, K. 1995. Realistic modeling for facial animation. In Proceedings of SIGGRAPH, pp. 55–62.

  • Leung, T. and Malik, J. 1999. Recognizing surfaces using three-dimensional textons. In International Conference on Computer Vision, vol. 2, pp. 1010–1017.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leung, T. and Malik, J. 2001. Representing and recognizing the visual appearance of materials using three-dimensional textons. International Journal of Computer Vision, 43(1):29–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, X., Yu, Y., and Shum, H. 2001. Synthesizing bidirectional texture functions for real-world surfaces. In Proceedings of SIGGRAPH pp. 97–106.

  • Ma, W.Y. and Manjunath, B.S. 1996. Texture features and learning similarity. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 425–430.

  • McGunnigle, G. and Chantler, M.J. 2000. Rough surface classification using first order statistics from photometric stereo. Pattern Recognition Letters, 21:593–604.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murase, H. and Nayar, S.K. 1995. Visual learning and recognition of 3-D objects from appearance. International Journal of Computer Vision, pp. 5–24.

  • Nahas, M., Huitric, H., Rioux, M., and Domey, J. 1990. Facial image synthesis using skin texture recording. Visual Computer, 6(6):337–343.

    Google Scholar 

  • Penirschke, A., Chantler, M., and Petrou, M. 2002. Illuminant rotation invariant classification of 3D surface textures using Lissajous’s ellipses. In Proceedings of Texture 2002-The 2nd International Workshop on Texture Analysis and Synthesis, pp. 103–108.

  • Pont, S.C. and Koenderink, J.J. 2002. Bidirectional texture contrast function. In Proceedings ofthe European Conference on Computer Vision, vol. 2353(IV), pp. 808–822.

    Google Scholar 

  • Puzicha, J., Ioffman, T., and Buchmann, J. 1999. Histogram clustering for unsupervized image segmentation. International Conference on Computer Vision, 2:602–608.

    Google Scholar 

  • Randen, T. and Husoy, J.H. 1999. Filtering for texture classification: A comparative study. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 21(4):291–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suen. P. and Healey, G. 1998. Analyzing the bidirectional texture function. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 753–758.

  • Suen, P. and Healey, G. 2000. The analysis and recognition of real-world textures in three dimensions. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 22(5):491–503.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Ginneken, B., Koenderink, J.J., and Dana, K.J. 1999. Texture histograms as a function of irradiation and viewing direction. International Journal of Computer Vision, 31(2/3):169–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Varma, M. and Zisserman, A. 2002. Classifying images of materials. In Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision, pp. 255–271.

  • Zalesny, A. and van Gool, L. 2001. Multiview texture models. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, vol. 1, pp. 615–622.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cula, O.G., Dana, K.J., Murphy, F.P. et al. Skin Texture Modeling. Int J Comput Vision 62, 97–119 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:VISI.0000046591.79973.6f

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:VISI.0000046591.79973.6f

Navigation