Skip to main content
Log in

Methodology for selection of charging agents for electrophoretic deposition of ceramic particles

  • Published:
Journal of Materials Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The zeta potential of particles is a key factor in the electrophoretic deposition process. It plays a role in the stabilization of the suspension by determining the intensity of repulsive interactions as well as in determining the direction and velocity of particle migration.

The zeta potential can be controlled by addition of charging agents such as acids, bases, and specifically adsorbed ions or polyelectrolytes, to the suspension. Thus there exist a variety of additives that affect the charge magnitude and its polarity. These additives act by different mechanisms.

The main criteria for the selection of a charging agent are the preferred polarity and deposition rate of the particles. While the deposition rate is directly dependent on the zeta potential, which is determined by the charging additive, the influence of such an additive is exerted also by its effect on the ionic conductivity of the suspension. The latter determines the potential drop in the bulk of the suspension, which constitutes the driving force for the transfer of the particles to the electrodes.

The present work will describe the methodology developed at Cerel for the selection of a charging agent based on its effect on the zeta potential/pH curve, on the isoelectric point and on the ionic conductivity of the suspension.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. U. Paik and V. A. Hackley, J. Amer. Ceram. Soc. 83 (2000) 2381.

    Google Scholar 

  2. P. Sarkar and P. Nicholson, ibid. 79 (1996) 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  3. M. S. J. Gani, Industr. Ceram. 14 (1994) 163.

    Google Scholar 

  4. R. Moreno, J. Amer. Ceram. Soc., Bulletin 71 (1992) 1521.

    Google Scholar 

  5. D. De and P. Nicholson, J. Amer. Ceram. Soc. 82 (1999) 3031.

    Google Scholar 

  6. I. Zhitomirsky, J. Mater. Sci. 52 (2000) 1.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zarbov, M., Schuster, I. & Gal-Or, L. Methodology for selection of charging agents for electrophoretic deposition of ceramic particles. Journal of Materials Science 39, 813–817 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JMSC.0000012908.18329.93

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JMSC.0000012908.18329.93

Keywords

Navigation