Skip to main content
Log in

Genetic variation among marine Brachionus strains and function of mate recognition pheromone (MRP)

  • Published:
Hydrobiologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Recent studies on morphology and genetics of marinerotifer populations have demonstrated the existence ofconsiderable variation. Differences in theglycoprotein structure of a mate recognition pheromone(MRP) probably have a primary role in maintainingspecies boundaries among Brachionus species.This study examined factors involved in mating toclarify their relation with genetic variability. Threeexperiments were performed using 3 Brachionusplicatilis strains (Russia, Germany and Tokyo) and 4B. rotundiformis strains (Hamana, Fiji, Thai andSpain).Selfing and cross mating of 7 rotifer strains wasconducted in the first experiment. Russian malesmated with B. plicatilis females in thefollowing increasing order, based on mating attempts:German, Tokyo and Russia. There was little matingattempts with females of B. rotundiformisstrains. In a second set of experiments, the binding of anantibody (anti-MRP) derived from the MRP of Russianstrain was tested. A fluorescent label was attached toanti-MRP and the antibody reacted with the MRP onfemales of seven strains. The fluorescence intensity,indicating the degree of antibody binding, wasmeasured with epifluorescence microscopy and imageanalysis. The binding intensity of the anti-MRP to theMRP was in the following increasing order: Hamana,Fiji, Spain, German, Tokyo, Thai and Russia.It was expected that when the anti-MRP binds tothe MRP of a female, the male‘s recognition of thefemale would be inhibited. In the third experiment,male mating with females exposed to the anti-MRP wascompared with unexposed females. Russia Tokyo, Thaiand Spain females exposed to anti-MRP, elicited fewermale mating attempts than unexposed females. Matingfrequency and anti-MRP binding significantlycorrelated with genetic distance obtained from isozymeanalysis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Fu, Y., K. Hirayama & Y. Natsukari, 1991a. Morphological differences between two types of the rotifer Brachionus plicatilis O. F. Müller. J. exp. mar. Biol. Ecol. 151: 29–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fu, Y., K. Hirayama & Y. Natsukari, 1991b. Genetic divergence between S and L type strains of the rotifer Brachionus plicatilis O. F. Müller. J. exp. mar. Biol. Ecol. 151: 43–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fu, Y., A. Hagiwara & K. Hirayama, 1993. Crossing between seven strains of the rotifer Brachionus plicatilis. Nippon Suisan Gakkaishi 59: 2009–2016.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gómez, A. & M. Serra, 1995. Behavioral reproductive isolation among sympatric strains of Brachionus plicatilisMüller 1786: insights into the status of this taxonomic species. Hydrobiologia 313/314: 111–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagiwara, A. & K. Hirayama, 1993. Preservation of rotifers and its application in the finish hatchery. In Lee, C. S., M. S. Su & I. C. Liao (eds), Finfish Hatchery in Asia: Proc. Finish Hatchery in Asia ’91. Tungkang Marine Lab., Taiwan Fisheries Research Inst., Tungkang, Taiwan. Pitung, TML Conf. Proc. 3: 61–71.

  • Hagiwara, A., T. Kotani, T.W. Snell, M. Assava-Aree & K. Hirayama, 1995. Morphology, genetics, and mating behavior of small tropical marine Brachionusstrains (Rorifera). J. exp. mar. Biol. Ecol. 194: 25–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirayama, K. & I. F. M. Rumengan, 1993. The fecundity patterns of S and L type rotifers of Brachionus plicatilis. Hydrobiologia 255/256: 153–157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rico-Martínez, R. & T. W. Snell, 1995a. Male discrimination of female Brachionus plicatilisMüller and Brachionus rotundiformis Tschugunoff (Rotifera). J. exp. mar. Biol. Ecol. 190: 39–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rico-Martínez, R. & T. W. Snell, 1995b. Mating behavior and mate recognition pheromone blocking ofmale receptors in Brachionus plicatilisMüller (Rotifera) strains. Hydrobiologia 313/314: 105–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rico-Martínez, R. & T. W. Snell, 1997. Comparative binding of antibody to a mate recognition pheromone on female Brachionus plicatilisand Brachionus rotundiformis. (Rotifera). Hydrobiologia 358: 71–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, J. S., 1972. Studies in genetics VII. University of Texas, University of Texas Publication, No. 7213, Austin, Texas, 145 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rumengan, I. F. M., H. Kayano & K. Hirayama, 1991. Karyotypes of S and L type rotifers Brachionus plicatilisO. F.Müller. J. exp. mar. Biol. Ecol. 154: 171–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Segers, H., 1995. Nomenclature consequences of some recent studies on Brachionus plicatilis(Rotifera, Brachionidae). Hydrobiologia 313/314: 121–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snell, T. W., 1989. Systematics, reproductive isolation and species boundaries inmonogonont rotifers. Hydrobiologia 186/187: 299–310.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snell, T. W. & C. A. Hawkinson, 1983. Behavioral reproductive isolation among populations of the rotifer Brachionus plicatilis. Evolution. 37: 1294–1305.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snell, T. W. & F. H. Hoff, 1987. Fertilization and male fertility in the rotifer Brachionus plicatilis. Hydrobiologia 147: 329–334.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snell, T. W., P. D. Morris & G. Cecchine, 1993. Localization of the mate-recognition pheromone in Brachionus plicatilisO. F.Müller (Rotifera) by fluorescent labeling with lectins. J. exp. mar. Biol. Ecol. 165: 225–235.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snell, T. W., R. Rico-Martínez, L. S. Kelly & T. E. Battle, 1995. Identification of a sex pheromone from a rotifer. Mar. Biol. 123: 347–353.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kotani, T., Hagiwara, A. & Snell, T.W. Genetic variation among marine Brachionus strains and function of mate recognition pheromone (MRP). Hydrobiologia 358, 105–112 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003176221840

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003176221840

Navigation