Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Inquiry and Analysis: Dewey and Russell on Philosophy

  • Published:
Studies in Philosophy and Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In an environment characterized by the emergence of new and diverse (and often opposed) philosophical efforts, there is a need for a conception of philosophy that will promote the exchange and critical consideration of divergent insights. Depending upon the operative conception, philosophical efforts can be viewed as significant, insightful and instructive, or unimportant, misguided and not “real” philosophy. This paper develops John Dewey's conception of philosophy as a mode of inquiry in contrast with Bertrand Russell's conception of philosophy as a mode of analysis. I argue that while Russell's analytic conception of philosophy justifies the dismissal of non-analytic philosophies, Dewey's conception of philosophy provides a theoretical framework for the comparison, evaluation and interaction of alternatives.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Antony, L.: 1993, ‘Quine as Feminist: The Radical Import of Naturalized Epistemology’, in L. Antony and C. Witt (eds.), A Mind of One's Own: Feminist Essays on Reason and Objectivity, Westview Press, Boulder, pp. 185–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boydston, J. (ed.): 1969–1972, The Early Works, 1882–1898, Southern Illinois University Press, Carbondale.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boydston, J. (ed.): 1976–1983, The Middle Works, 1899–1924, Southern Illinois University Press, Carbondale.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boydston, J. (ed.): 1981–1990, The Later Works: 1925–1953, Southern Illinois University Press, Carbondale.

    Google Scholar 

  • Code, L.: 1991, What Can She Know? Feminist Theory and the Construction of Knowledge, Cornell University Press, Ithaca.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coughlan, N.: 1973, Young John Dewey: An Essay in American Intellectual History, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J.: 1884, ‘Kant and Philosophical Method,’ in J. Boydston (ed.), The Early Works, 1969–1972, Volume 1.

  • Dewey, J.: 1886a, ‘The Psychological Standpoint’, in J. Boydston (ed.), The Early Works, 1969–1972, Volume 1.

  • Dewey, J.: 1886b, ‘Psychology as Philosophic Method’, in J. Boydston (ed.), The Early Works, 1969–1972, Volume 1.

  • Dewey, J.: 1893a. ‘Why Study Philosophy?’, in J. Boydston (ed.), The Early Works, 1969–1972, Volume 4.

  • Dewey, J.; 1893b, ‘The Relation of Philosophy to Theology’, in J. Boydston (ed.), The Early Works, 1969–1972, Volume 4.

  • Dewey, J.: 1899, ‘“Consciousness” and Experience’, in J. Boydston (ed.), The Middle Works, 1976–1983, Volume 1.

  • Dewey, J.: 1971, ‘The Need for a Recovery of Philosophy’, in J. Boydston (ed.), The Middle Works, 1976–1983, Volume 12.

  • Dewey, J.: 1927, ‘Philosophy and Civilization’, in J. Boydston (ed.), The Later Works, 1981–1990, Volume 3.

  • Dewey, J.: 1929a, ‘The Quest for Certainty’, in J. Boydston (ed.), The Later Works, 1981–1990, Volume 4.

  • Dewey, J.: 1929b, ‘The Sphere of Application of the Excluded Middle’, in J. Boydston (ed.), The Later Works, 1981–1990, Volume 5.

  • Dewey, J.: 1930, ‘The Applicability of Logic to Existence’, in J. Boydston (ed.), The Later Works, 1981–1990, Volume 5.

  • Dewey, J.: 1931, ‘Context and Thought’, in J. Boydston (ed.), The Later Works, 1981–1990, Volume 6.

  • Dewey, J.: 1933, ‘How We Think’, Revised Edition, in J. Boydston (ed.), The Later Works, 1981–1990, Volume 8.

  • Dewey, J.: 1938a, ‘Experience and Education’, in J. Boydston (ed.), The Later Works, 1981–1990, Volume 13.

  • Dewey, J.: 1938b, ‘Logic: The Theory of Inquiry’, in J. Boydston (ed.), The Later Works, 1981–1990, Volume 12.

  • Dewey, J.: 1938c, ‘The Determination of Ultimate Values or Aims through Antecedent or A Priori Speculation or through Pragmatic or Empirical Inquiry’, in J. Boydston (ed.), The Later Works, 1981–1990, Volume 13.

  • Dewey, J.: 1939, ‘Experience, Knowledge and Value: A Rejoinder’, in J. Boydston (ed.), The Later Works, 1981–1990, Volume 14.

  • Dewey, J.: 1946, ‘Introduction to Problems of Men: the Problems of Men and the Present State of Philosophy’, in J. Boydston (ed.), The Later Works, 1981–1990, Volume 15.

  • Dewey, J.: 1949a, ‘Common Sense and Science’, in J. Boydston (ed.), The Later Works, 1981–1990, Volume 16.

  • Dewey, J.: 1949b, ‘Appendix: Dewey's Reply to Albert G. A. Balz’, in J. Boydston (ed.), The Later Works, 1981–1990, Volume 16.

  • Dewey, J.: 1949c, ‘Has Philosophy a Future?’, in J. Boydston (ed.), The Later Works, 1981–1990, Volume 16.

  • Dewey, J.: 1949d, ‘Philosophy's Future in Our Scientific Age: Never Was Its Role More Crucial’, in J. Boydston (ed.), The Later Works, 1981–1990, Volume 16.

  • Dewey, J.: 1952, ‘Modern Philosophy’, in J. Boydston (ed.), The Later Works, 1981–1990, Volume 16.

  • Dewey, J.: 1969, ‘Introduction to Philosophy: Syllabus of Course 5’, in J. Boydston (ed.), The Early Works, 1969–1972, Volume 3.

  • Dewey, J.: 1989, ‘Importance, Significance, and Meaning’, in J. Boydston (ed.), The Later Works, 1981–1990, Volume 16.

  • Eames, Elizabeth R.: 1969, Bertrand Russell's Theory of Knowledge, George Braziller, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, W.: 1978, ‘The Legitimacy and Necessity of Black Philosophy’, Philosophy Forum 9(2–3), 149–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, B.: 1939, ‘Dewey's New Logic’, in Paul Arthur Schilpp (ed.), The Philosophy of John Dewey, Open Court, La Salle, Illinois, pp. 135–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, B.: 1944, ‘Reply to Criticisms’, in Paul Arthur Schilpp (ed.), The Philosophy of Bertrand Russell, Open Court, La Salle, Illinois, pp. 680–741.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, B.: 1948, Human Knowledge: Its Scope and Limits, Simon and Schuster, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, B.: 1956, ‘The Philosophy of Logical Atomism’, in R. Marsh (ed.), Logic and Knowlege, Unwin Hyman, London, pp. 175–282. (Original work published in 1918.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, B.: 1960, An Outline of Philosophy, 1940, George Allen & Unwin, London; reprint, Baltimore: Pelican Books (page references are to the reprint edition).

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, B.: 1968, The Art of Philosophizing, The Philosophy Library, Inc., New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Seigfried, C. Haddock: 1996, Pragmatism and Feminism: Reweaving the Social Fabric, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherwin, S.: 1989, ‘Philosophical Methodology and Feminist Methodology: Are they Compatible?’, in A. Garry and M. Pearsall (eds.), Women, Knowledge and Reality, Unwin Hyman, Boston, pp. 5–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • West, C.: 1978, ‘Philosophy and the Afro-American Experience’, Philosophical Forum 9(2–3), 117–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Witt, C.: 1993, ‘Feminist Metaphysics’, in L. Antony and C. Witt (eds.), A Mind of One's Own: Feminist Essays on Reason and Objectivity, Westview Press, Boulder, pp. 273–288.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Philosophy, University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon, U.S.A.

    Scott L. Pratt

Authors
  1. Scott L. Pratt
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pratt, S.L. Inquiry and Analysis: Dewey and Russell on Philosophy. Studies in Philosophy and Education 17, 101–122 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005002930589

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005002930589

Search

Navigation