Abstract
A major challenge for China is the frequency of so-called ‘mass incidents’ or protests that have been on the rise in recent years. Many such incidents are the result of forced expropriation of farmland by local government authorities for a wide variety of purposes, including the goal of industrialization of the economy. This article examines the challenges faced by rural citizens to access formal systems of justice while seeking a legal remedy. Why are formal systems of justice not effective in settling disputes on land expropriation in China? What are the obstacles faced by landless farmers in accessing justice, and how can such obstacles be overcome? We examine existing regulations for settling compensation disputes in China and discuss several concrete examples from the field in order to identify numerous institutional challenges. These include a very demanding applicant requirement, ambiguous provisions such as no time limit for compulsory mediation, and the inability of the petitions system to address land dispute cases. We argue that the adjudication system itself is an obstacle for farmers who wish to seek an administrative or legal remedy. The political, administrative and judicial authorities in China prefer the maintenance of strict and specific norms rather than facilitating more adaptable and feasible alternatives. Without a major overhaul of current dispute settlement mechanisms, the number and frequency of severe social conflicts between farmers and local governments will continue to increase. Major reforms are required to better protect the rights of landless farmers and other citizens whose properties have been expropriated.
Similar content being viewed by others
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
We thank the following for generously funding this research: The Programme on Democracy at the University of Oslo, the China Programme at the Norwegian Center for Human Rights and the Beijing Higher Education Young Elite Teacher Project. We are also grateful to colleagues in Oslo, Beijing and Stanford, far too many to mention individually, in addition to an anonymous referee, for helpful comments and suggestions. The usual disclaimer applies.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zhou, C., Banik, D. Access to Justice and Social Unrest in China’s Countryside: Disputes on Land Acquisition and Compensation. Hague J Rule Law 6, 254–275 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1017/S1876404514001110
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1876404514001110