Skip to main content

Land Reform in South Africa: The Politics of Expropriation Without Compensation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Land Tenure Challenges in Africa

Part of the book series: Economic Geography ((ECOGEO))

  • 387 Accesses

Abstract

The past four years have seen fierce debates over a radical proposal aimed at speeding up the redistribution of land in South Africa—the expropriation of privately-owned land without the payment of compensation. The proposal and its reception must be located within the complex politics of land in the post-apartheid era, in a context where land reform is widely seen as failing to live up to its promise. The notion that ‘expropriation without compensation’ (EWC) offers a simple solution to the many problems facing land reform in South Africa is critically assessed and found wanting. To address the wider problems of land reform and ensure that it’s potential is realized, the state must address other key aspects of policy—beyond simply land acquisition and its cost. These include specifying the socio-political purposes of land reform, intended beneficiaries, anticipated impacts on livelihoods, the nature of land rights to be held by beneficiaries, and building capacity for effective implementation. But government is unlikely to do so on its own accord; sustained pressure ‘from below’, exerted by potential beneficiaries themselves as well as their allies in civil society and the state, will be required. Popular politics is thus key to the prospects for appropriate and effective land policy in South Africa.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    Land in the rural context is emphasized here, as was the case in the first twenty years of land reform. In recent years urban land, mainly for settlement purposes, has become another key focus of land reform policy.

  2. 2.

    I discuss the constitutional framework in relation to expropriation of property in more detail below.

  3. 3.

    The Natives Land Act of 1913, which formalised longstanding processes of land dispossession across the country, was adopted on the 19th June 1913.

  4. 4.

    https://www.dailymaverick.co.za/article/2014-08-11-op-ed-land-reform-cloud-cuckoo-land-or-calculus-of-power/.

  5. 5.

    This characterisation of the political terrain in relation to land policy reflects the broad contours of the debate, but not the details of the positions adopted by different groupings and analysts, which are much more complex. Some combine elements of both ‘left’ and ‘right’ critiques. For example, two eminent liberal historians have co-authored a book (Beinart et al. 2017) and several articles (e.g. Beinart and Delius 2018) which suggest that government has neglected the interests of the rural and urban poor, echoing many ‘left’ critics. But they also call for individual land titling to become the predominant form of property right, the promotion of black commercial farming (rather than smallholders), and preservation (rather than restructuring) of the large-scale commercial farming sector, echoing critics from the ‘right’. Similarly, diverging views on the role of traditional leaders in relation to land have long been in evidence amongst land NGOs, despite their perspectives being generally ‘left-leaning’ in character.

  6. 6.

    Mngxitama (2005) suggests that tensions within the NLC before its demise reflected fundamental differences in political ideology, with many of its provincial affiliates having their origins in a liberal response to late apartheid violence and dispossessions, but by the mid-1990s becoming a home for more radical views as well.

  7. 7.

    https://www.iol.co.za/news/politics/land-reform-proposal-met-with-mixed-reactions-265377.

  8. 8.

    https://www.ardt.org.za; https://afra.co.za/.

  9. 9.

    https://agrisa.co.za/land.

  10. 10.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economic_Freedom_Fighters (accessed 14 December 2020).

  11. 11.

    https://www.sowetanlive.co.za/opinion/columnists/2018-07-02-effs-fascist-agenda--rapidly-clarifies-itself-through-malemas-racial-outbursts/.

  12. 12.

    https://www.dailymaverick.co.za/article/2014-06-24-expropriation-without-compensation-its-game-on/.

  13. 13.

    https://www.biznews.com/leadership/2016/02/15/malema-sa-needs-zimbabwe-style-land-expropriation-without-compensation.

  14. 14.

    https://mg.co.za/article/2019-02-07-00-the-land-wars-of-2019-analysing-the-eff-and-anc-manifestos/.

  15. 15.

    This arrangement is not legislated, but is an accepted practice or tradition of the ANC.

  16. 16.

    https://www.businesslive.co.za/bd/national/2017-07-02-zuma-faction-pushing-for-referendum-on-land-expropriation-without-compensation/.

  17. 17.

    https://www.dailymaverick.co.za/opinionista/2020-10-14-land-reform-we-should-think-small-to-grow-big/.

  18. 18.

    https://www.news24.com/news24/SouthAfrica/News/breaking-national-assembly-adopts-motion-on-land-expropriation-without-compensation-20180227.

  19. 19.

    https://www.dailymaverick.co.za/article/2019-12-06-politics-in-the-time-of-expropriation-without-compensation/; https://www.dailymaverick.co.za/article/2020-01-28-ancs-executive-proposal-on-expropriation-without-compensation-obscures-already-vast-ministerial-powers/.

  20. 20.

    For a sample of this literature see Bhorat et al. (2017), Chipkin and Swilling (2018), Olver (2017), Pauw (2017).

  21. 21.

    https://www.dailymaverick.co.za/article/2014-08-11-op-ed-land-reform-cloud-cuckoo-land-or-calculus-of-power/.

  22. 22.

    https://www.timeslive.co.za/news/south-africa/2018-03-02-institutions-of-land-reform-need-to-be-strengthened-ngcukaitobi-says/.

  23. 23.

    For example, https://www.iol.co.za/capetimes/opinion/landexpropriation-for-what-land-reform-for-whom-your-land-questions-answered-16370960.

References

  • Aliber M (2015) Unravelling the ‘willing buyer, willing seller’ question. In: Cousins B, Walker C (eds) Land divided, land restored. Jacana, Johannesburg, pp 145–160

    Google Scholar 

  • Aliber M, Maluleke T, Manenzhe T, Paradza G, Cousins B (2013) Land reform and livelihoods: trajectories of change in Limpopo province, South Africa. HSRC Press, Cape Town

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrews M (2007) Struggling for a life in dignity. In: Ntsebeza L, Hall R (eds) The land question in South Africa: the challenge of transformation and redistribution. HSRC Press, Cape Town, pp 2012–2219

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnett C (2017) The Ppiority of injustice: locating democracy in critical theory. University of Georgia Press, Athens

    Google Scholar 

  • Beinart W, Delius P, Hay M (2017) Rights to land: a guide to tenure upgrading and restitution in South Africa. Fanele, Johannesburg

    Google Scholar 

  • Beinart W, Delius P (2018) Land reform and smallholders: a realistic perspective. Centre for Development and Enterprise, Johannesburg

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhorat H, Buthelezi M, Chipkin I, Duma S, Mondi S, Peters C, Qobo M, Swilling M, Friedenstein H (2017) Betrayal of the promise. How South Africa is being stolen. Centre for Complex Systems in Transition (University of Stellenbosch), Public Affairs Institute (University of Witwatersrand), Development Policy Research Institute (University of Cape Town), South African Research Chair in African Diplomacy and Foreign Policy (University of Johannesburg)

    Google Scholar 

  • Centre for Development and Enterprise (2008) Land reform: getting back on track. Centre for Development and Enterprise, Johannesburg

    Google Scholar 

  • Centre for Development and Enterprise (2018) Agriculture, land reform and jobs. Can South Africa make this work? Centre for Development and Enterprise, Johannesburg

    Google Scholar 

  • Chipkin I, Swilling M (2018) Shadow state. The politics of state capture. Wits University Press, Johannesburg

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Claassens A, Cousins B (eds) (2008) Land, power and custom: controversies generated by South Africa’s Communal Land Rights Act. UCT Press, Cape Town

    Google Scholar 

  • Claassens A, Matlala B (2014) Platinum, poverty and princes in post-apartheid South Africa: new laws, old repertoires. In: Khadiagala G, Naidoo, P, Pillay D, Southall R (eds) New South African review 4. Wits University Press, Johannesburg, pp 117–139

    Google Scholar 

  • Claassens A (2015) Law, land and custom, 1913–2014: What is at stake today? In: Cousins B, Walker C (eds) Land Divided, Land Restored. Land Reform in South Africa for the 21st Century Jacana Media, Johannesburg

    Google Scholar 

  • Cousins B (2013) Land reform and agriculture uncoupled: the political economy of rural reform in post-apartheid South Africa. In: Hebinck P, Cousins B (eds) In the shadow of policy. Everyday practices in South Africa’s land and agrarian reform. Wits University Press, Johannesburg, pp 47–62

    Google Scholar 

  • Cousins B (2015) ‘Through a glass darkly’: towards agrarian reform in South Africa. In: Cousins B, Walker C (eds) Land divided, land restored. Jacana, Johannesburg, pp 250–269

    Google Scholar 

  • Cousins B (2016) Land reform in South Africa is failing. Can it be saved? Transform: Crit Perspect South Afr 92(1):135–157

    Google Scholar 

  • De Jager T (2015) Land reform: the view from commercial agriculture. In: Cousins B, Walker C (eds) Land divided land restored: land reform in South Africa for the 21st century. Jacana, Johannesburg, pp 120–126

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Land Affairs (1997) White paper on South African land policy. Department of Land Affairs, Pretoria

    Google Scholar 

  • du Toit A (2018) Land reform-cloud cuckoo land or calculus of power? Daily Maverick, 11 Aug 2018. https://www.dailymaverick.co.za/article/2014-08-11-op-ed-land-reform-cloud-cuckoo-land-or-calculus-of-power/. Accessed 25 Jan 2021

  • du Toit A (2019) Whose land question? Policy deliberation and populist reason in the South African land debate. PLAAS Working Paper 60. University of the Western Cape, Bellville

    Google Scholar 

  • Gramsci A (1920) Address to the anarchists. L’Ordine Novo, 30 Apr 1920

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg S (2004) The landless people’s movement and the failure of post-apartheid land reform. Centre for Civil Society, University of Kwa-Zulu Natal, Durban

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall R (2010) Two cycles of land policy in South Africa: tracing the contours. In: Annseeuw W, Alden C (eds) The struggle over land in Africa conflicts, politics and change. HSRC Press, Pretoria

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall R (2015) Mapping ANC policy development on land and agrarian reform since 1994. In: Cousins B, Walker C (eds) Land divided, land restored. Jacana, Johannesburg, p 127–144

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall R (2018) #LandExpropriation for what? Land reform for whom? Your land questions answered. Public lecture, University of the Western Cape, 2 Aug 2018

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall R, Kepe T (2017) Elite capture and state neglect: new evidence on South Africa’s land reform. Rev Afr Polit Econ 44:122–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hendricks F (2013) Rhetoric and reality in restitution and redistribution: ongoing land and agrarian questions in South Africa. In: The promise of land: undoing a century of dispossession in South Africa. Jacana, Johannesburg, pp 27–53

    Google Scholar 

  • Hornby D, Kingwill R, Royston L, Cousins B (eds) (2017) Untitled: securing land tenure in urban and rural South Africa. University of KwaZulu-Natal Press, Durban

    Google Scholar 

  • Jara M (2019) Land redistribution in South Africa: pondering the solidarity economy alternative. Paper presented at a conference on resolving the land question: land redistribution for equitable access to land in South Africa, University of Western Cape, 4–5 Feb 2019

    Google Scholar 

  • Kepe T, Hall R (2016) Land redistribution in South Africa. Paper commissioned by the High Level Panel on the assessment of key legislation and the acceleration of fundamental change. Parliament of South Africa, Cape Town

    Google Scholar 

  • Klug H (2000) Constituting democracy: law, globalism, and South Africa’s political reconstruction. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lahiff E (2001) Land reform in South Africa: is it meeting the challenge? PLAAS Policy Brief No. 1. University of the Western Cape, Bellville

    Google Scholar 

  • Lahiff E (2007) ‘Willing buyer, willing seller’: South Africa’s failed experiment in market-led agrarian reform. Third World Q 28(8):1577–1597

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levin R (2000) Towards a national implementation strategy for land redistribution. In: Cousins B (ed) At the Crossroads. Land and agrarian reform in South Africa into the 21st century. University of the Western, Cape Town

    Google Scholar 

  • Liebenberg S (2010) Socio-economic rights. Adjudication under a transformative constitution. Juta, Cape Town

    Google Scholar 

  • Marais H (2011) South Africa pushed to the limit. University of Cape Town Press, Cape Town

    Google Scholar 

  • Maseko S (1999) The real rise of the black middle class. Mail and Guardian, 21 May 1999

    Google Scholar 

  • Mencken H (1920) Prejudices: second series. Knopf, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Mngxitama A (2005) The National Land Committee, 1994–2004: a critical insider’s perspective. Centre for Civil Society, University of Kwa-Zulu Natal, Durban

    Google Scholar 

  • Mtero F, Gumede N, Ramantsina K (2019) Elite capture in land redistribution in South Africa. PLAAS Research Report No. 55. University of the Western Cape, Cape Town

    Google Scholar 

  • Nkwinti G (2013) Foreword. In: Annual report of the Commission for the Restitution of Land Rights for 2012/13. Department of Rural Development and Land Reform, Pretoria

    Google Scholar 

  • Ntsebeza L (2007) Land redistribution in South Africa: the property clause revisited. In: Ntsebeza L, Hall R (eds) The land question in South Africa: the challenge of redistribution and transformation. HSRC Press, Cape Town

    Google Scholar 

  • Ntsebeza L, Hall R (eds) (2007) The Land Question in South Africa: the Challenge of Redistribution and Transformation. HSRC Press, Cape Town

    Google Scholar 

  • Olver C (2017) How to steal a city: the battle for Nelson Mandela Bay, an inside account. Jonathan Ball Publishers, Johannesburg

    Google Scholar 

  • Parliament of South Africa (2017) Report of the High Level Panel on the assessment of key legislation and the acceleration of fundamental change. Parliament of South Africa, Cape Town

    Google Scholar 

  • Pauw J (2017) President’s keepers. Tafelberg, Cape Town

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramutsindela M, Hartnack A (2019) Centring ordinary people: grounded approaches to land reform in Southern Africa. Anthropol South Afr 42(3):195–201

    Google Scholar 

  • Sommerville M (2019) Agrarian repair: agriculture, race and accumulation in contemporary Canada and South Africa. Doctoral dissertation, University of British Columbia

    Google Scholar 

  • Steenhuisen J (2020) Property rights and rule of law the wisest way forward. Business Day, 3 Sept 2020. https://www.businesslive.co.za/bd/opinion/2020-09-03-john-steenhuisen-property-rights-and-the-rule-of-law-the-wisest-way-forward/

  • The Presidency (2019) Final report of Presidential Advisory Panel on land reform and agriculture. The Presidency, Pretoria

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker C (2015) Sketch map to the future: restitution unbound. In: Cousins B, Walker C (eds) Land divided, land restored. Jacana, Johannesburg, pp 232–249

    Google Scholar 

  • Wegerif M, Russell B, Grundling I (2005) Still searching for security: the reality of farm dweller evictions in South Africa. Nkuzi Development Association, Johannesburg and Polokwane

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ben Cousins .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Cousins, B. (2021). Land Reform in South Africa: The Politics of Expropriation Without Compensation. In: Chitonge, H., Harvey, R. (eds) Land Tenure Challenges in Africa. Economic Geography. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-82852-3_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-82852-3_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-82851-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-82852-3

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics