Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Potential of organic waste to energy and bio-fertilizer production in Sub-Saharan Africa: a review

  • Review
  • Published:
Waste Disposal & Sustainable Energy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Many growing cities of Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) are marred by the inefficient collection, management, disposal and reuse of organic waste. The purpose of this study was to review and compare the energy recovery potential as well as bio-fertilizer perspective, from the organic waste volumes generated in SSA countries. Based on computations made with a literature review, we find that the amount of organic wastes varies across countries translating to differences in the energy and bio-fertilizer production potentials across countries. Organic wastes generated in SSA can potentially generate about 133 million GWh of energy per year. The organic waste to bio-fertilizer production potentials range from 11.08 million tons to 306.26 million tons annually. Ghana has the highest energy and bio-fertilizer potential among the SSA countries with a total per capita of 630 MWh/year and 306.26 million tons, respectively. The challenges and technical considerations for energy and bio-fertilizer approaches in the management of organic waste in SSA have also been discussed. This study is of help to the readers and strategic decision makers in understanding the contribution of bioenergy and bio-fertilizer to achieving sustainable development goals, namely, 7 (Affordable and Clean Energy) and 13 (Climate Action) in SSA.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The authors declare that the data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article (however, datasets generated during computations and approximations are available from the corresponding author).

References

  1. Khan, I., Chowdhury, S., and Techato, K. 2022. Waste to energy in developing countries-a rapid review: Opportunities, challenges, and policies in selected countries of Sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia. Sustainability 14(7):27. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14073740.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Patel, P., Modi, A., Minipara, D., et al. 2021. Microbial biosurfactants in management of organic waste. In Sustainable Environmental Clean-up. Amsterdam: Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-823828-8.00010-4.

  3. Contreras, M., Gázquez. M.J., Romero, M., et al. 2020. Recycling of industrial wastes for value-added applications in clay-based ceramic products: A global review. In: New materials in Civil Engineering. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann.https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-818961-0.00005-3.

  4. Chernysh, Y., Shtepa, V., Roy, I., et al. 2021. The potential of organic waste as a substrate for anaerobic digestion in Ukraine: Trend definitions and environmental safety of the practices. Environmental Problems 6(3):135–144.

  5. Orhorhoro, E.K., Oghoghorie, O. 2019. Review on solid waste generation and management in Sub-Saharan Africa : A case study of Nigeria. Journal of Applied Sciences and Environmental Management 23(9):1729–1737. https://doi.org/10.4314/jasem.v23i9.19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bobeck, M. 2010. Organic household waste in developing countries: An overview of environmental and health consequences, and appropriate decentralised technologies and strategies for sustainable management. Saarbrucken: VDM Verlag Dr. Müller.

  7. World Bank. 2018. Global waste to grow by 70 percent by 2050 unless urgent action is taken: World Bank report. Available at: https://www.worldbank.org/en/news/press-release/2018/09/20/global-waste-to-grow-by-70-percent-by-2050-unless-urgent-action-is-taken-world-bank-report. Accessed 4 Jan 2022.

  8. Psomopoulos, C.S., Bourka, A., and Themelis, N.J. 2009. Waste-to-energy: A review of the status and benefits in USA. Waste Management 29(5):1718–1724. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2008.11.020.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Hoornweg, D., Bhada-Tata, P. 2012. What a Waste : A global review of solid waste management. Washington, DC: World Bank Group. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/17388.

  10. Moya, D., Aldás, C., and López, G. 2017. Municipal solid waste as a valuable renewable energy resource: A worldwide opportunity of energy recovery by using waste-to-energy technologies. Energy Procedia 134(1):286–295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2017.09.618.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Farooq, A., Haputta, P., Silalertruksa, T., et al. 2021. A framework for the selection of suitable waste to energy technologies for a sustainable municipal solid waste management system. Frontier Sustainability 2(1):1–17. https://doi.org/10.3389/frsus.2021.681690.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kalyani, K.A., and Pandey, K.K. 2014. Waste to energy status in India: A short review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 31:113–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2013.11.020.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Idowu, I. A., Atherton, W., Hashim, K., et al. 2019. An analyses of the status of landfill classification systems in developing countries: Sub Saharan Africa landfill experiences. Waste Management 87:761–771. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2019.03.011.

  14. Ogunjuyigbe, A.S.O., Ayodele, T.R., and Alao, M.A. 2017. Electricity generation from municipal solid waste in some selected cities of Nigeria: An assessment of feasibility, potential and technologies. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 80:149–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.05.177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Aghbashlo, M., Tabatabaei, M., Soltanian, S., et al. 2019. Biopower and biofertilizer production from organic municipal solid waste: An exergoenvironmental analysis. Renewable Energy 143: 64–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2019.04.109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Mohee, T., and Simelane, R. 2015. Future Directions of Municipal Solid Waste Management in Africa. Pretoria: Africa Institute of South Africa.

  17. Simatele, D.M., Dlamini, S., and Kubanza, N.S. 2017. From informality to formality: Perspectives on the challenges of integrating solid waste management into the urban development and planning policy in Johannesburg, South Africa. Habitat International 63:122–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2017.03.018.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Dlamini, S., Simatele, M. D., and Serge Kubanza, N. 2018. Municipal solid waste management in South Africa: from waste to energy recovery through waste-to-energy technologies in Johannesburg. Local Environment 24(3):249–257. https://doi.org/10.1080/13549839.2018.1561656.

  19. Aryampa, S., Maheshwari, B., Sabiiti, E., et al. 2019. Status of waste management in the East African cities: Understanding the drivers of Waste Generation, collection and disposal and their impacts on Kampala City’s sustainability. Sustainability 11(19):5523. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11195523.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Ddiba, D., Andersson, K., Rosemarin, A., et al. 2022. The circular economy potential of urban organic waste streams in low- and middle-income countries. Environment, Development Sustainability 24(1):1116–1144. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-021-01487-w.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Ekwe-Ekwe, H. 2010. What-is-Sub-Sahara-Africa. In: West Africa Review, Adeeko, A., Nzegwu, N., and Taiwo O, eds. Cape Town: Africa Resource Center.

  22. UN. 2020. United Nations, department of economic and social affairs, population division. World Population Prospects 2019. Volume II: Demographic Profiles. Available at: https://population.un.org/wpp/publications. Accessed 25 Jan 2022.

  23. IEA. 2019. Africa Energy Outlook 2019. In: World energy outlook special Report 2019. Paris: International Energy Agency. Available at: https://www.iea.org/reports/africa-energy-outlook-2019. Accessed 25 Jan 2022.

  24. African Development Bank Group. 2021. African Economic Outlook 2021- From Debt Resolution to Growth: The Road Ahead for Africa. Available at: https://www.afdb.org/en/documents/african-economic-outlook-2021. Accessed 25 Jan 2022.

  25. World Food Programme (WFP). 2022. Understanding the energy crisis and its impact on food security. Available at: https://www.wfp.org/publications/understanding-energy-crisis-and-its-impact-food-security. Accessed 23 Sept 2022.

  26. Médoc, J.-M., and van Veenhuizen, R. 2017. WABEF: Western Africa bio-wastes for energy and fertilisers. Urban Agriculture 32:11–17.

  27. Ngumah, C.C., Ogbulie, J.N., Orji, J.C., et al. 2021. Biogas potential of organic waste in Nigeria. Environmental Engineering 7(1):110–116. https://doi.org/10.5755/j01.erem.63.1.2912.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Raimi, A., Roopnarain, A., and Adeleke, R. 2021. Biofertilizer production in Africa: Current status, factors impeding adoption and strategies for success. Scientific African 11:e00694. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sciaf.2021.e00694.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Rupf, G., and De Boer, K. 2015. The energy production potential from organic solid waste in Sub-Saharan Africa. Available at: http://researchrepository.murdoch.edu.au/id/eprint/28351. Accessed 25 Jan 2022.

  30. Longfor, N.R. 2020. Biomass waste to energy in Cameroon: Analysis of its potential. Presented at 18th Asia Pacific Conference.

  31. Nhubu, T., and Muzenda, E. 2019. Determination of the least impactful municipal solid waste management option in Harare, Zimbabwe. Processes 7 (11): 785. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr7110785.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Nelson, N., Darkwa, J., Calautit, J., et al. 2021. Potential of bioenergy in rural Ghana. Sustainability 13:381. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13010381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Olujobi, O.J., Ufua, D.E., Olokundun, M., et al. 2022. Conversion of organic wastes to electricity in Nigeria: Legal perspective on the challenges and prospects. International Journal Environronmental Science Technology 19(2):939–950. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-020-03059-3.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Goldemberg, J., Reddy, A.K.N., Smith, K.R., et al. 2020. Rural energy in developing countries: A challenge for economic development. Annual Review of Energy and the Environment 10(1):367–384. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.energy.21.1.497.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. IRENA. 2016. Measuring small-scale biogas capacity and production. International Renewable Energy Agency (IRENA). Abu Dhabi 31.

  36. Renewables Info Grid. 2014. About Medication Errors: What is a Megawatt? Available at: http://www.utilipoint.com/2003/06/what-is-a-megawatt. Accessed 10 Feb 2022.

  37. Alabi, R.-A., Adams, O. O. 2015. The Pro-Poorness of Fertilizer Subsidy and Its Implications on Food Security in Nigeria. Work in Progress (WIP) report submitted to African Economic research Consortium, Nairobi, Kenya.

  38. IPE. 2021. Demonstrating the potential of biogas to contribute to the SDGs. IPE Triple Line. Available at: https://shellfoundation.org/Demonstrating_Biogas_Contribution_SDGs_Final.pdf. Accessed 25 Jan 2022.

  39. Waves. 2019. Uganda Woodfuels Overview. Technical report. https://www.docplayer.net/187887689/wavespartnership.org/UgandaNCA/Woodfuels/Overview

  40. McCord, A.I., Stefanos, S.A., Tumwesige, V., et al. 2020. Anaerobic digestion in Uganda: Risks and opportunities for integration of waste management and agricultural systems. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems 35(6):678–687. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1742170519000346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Dada, O.R., Mbohwa, C. 2016. Municipal solid waste from landfills a solution to energy crisis in South Africa. Conference paper. https://hdl.handle.net/10210/215015

  42. EPCM. 2022. Anaerobic digester design in South Africa. EPCM Consultants. Available at: https://epcmholdings.com/anaerobic-digester-design-in-south-africa. Accessed 11 Nov 2022.

  43. Cloete, K. 2018. Ground-breaking waste-to-energy plant opens in Cape Town. Environmental Home. https://www.engineering.co.za/article/ground-breaking-waste-to-energy-plant-opens-in-cape-town.

  44. Nyika, J. M., Onyari, E. K., and Dinka, M.O. 2020. Waste Management in South Africa. In Sustainable Waste Management Challenges in Developing Countries. Hershey: IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-0198-6.ch014

  45. Wiśniewska, M., Kulig, A., and Lelicińska-Serafin, K. 2021. Odour nuisance at municipal waste biogas plants and the effect of feedstock modification on the circular economy—A review. Energies 14(20):6470. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14206470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Tsai, C.J., Chen, M.L., Ye, A., et al. 2008. The relationship of odor concentration and the critical components emitted from food waste composting plants. Atmospheric Environment 42(35):8246–8251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.07.055.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Shane, A., Gheewala, S.H., and Kasali, G. 2015. Potential, barriers and prospects of biogas production in Zambia. Sustainable Energy & Environment 6:21–27.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Kamp, L.M., and Bermúdez Forn, E. 2016. Ethiopia’s emerging domestic biogas sector: Current status, bottlenecks and drivers. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 60:475–488. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.01.068.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Kelebe, H.E. 2018. Returns, setbacks, and future prospects of bio-energy promotion in northern Ethiopia: The case of family-sized biogas energy. Energy, Sustainability and Society 8(1):1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Ekane, N., Mertz, C.K., Slovic, P., et al. 2016. Risk and benefit judgment of excreta as fertilizer in agriculture: An exploratory investigation in Rwanda and Uganda. Human Ecological Risk Assessment 22:639–666. https://doi.org/10.1080/10807039.2015.1100515.

  51. Danso, G.K., Otoo, M., Ekere, M., et al. 2017. Feasibility of Faecal sludge and municipal solid waste-based compost as measured by farmers’ willingness-to-pay for product attributes: Evidence from Kampala, Uganda. Resources 6(3):31. https://doi.org/10.3390/resources6030031.

  52. Nag, R., Auer, A., Nolan, S., et al. 2021. Evaluation of pathogen concentration in anaerobic digestate using a predictive modelling approach (ADRISK ). Science of Total Environment 800:149574. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.149574.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Demirel, B., Gol, N. P., and Onay, T. T. 2013. Evaluation of heavy metal content in digestate from batch anaerobic co-digestion of sunflower hulls and poultry manure. Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management 15(2):242–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Islam, M. S., Ahmed, M. K., and Habibullah-Al-Mamun, M. 2014. Heavy metals in cereals and pulses: Health implications in Bangladesh. Agricultural and food chemistry 62(44):28–35. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf502486q.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Siciliano, A., Limonti, C., and Curcio, G.M. 2021. Improvement of Biomethane production from organic fraction of municipal solid waste ( OFMSW ) through alkaline hydrogen peroxide ( AHP ) Pretreatment. Fermentation 7 (197): 16. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation7030197.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Siciliano, V., Limonti, A., Curcio, C., et al. 2019. Biogas generation through anaerobic digestion of stirred tank reactors. Processes 7(9),635. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr7090635.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Holden, N. M., and Wolfe, M. L. 2021. Biogas energy from organic wastes. In Introduction to Biosystems Engineering. St. Joseph: American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers.

  58. Akinbomi, J. G., Patinvoh, R. J., and Taherzadeh, M. J. 2022. Current challenges of high solid anaerobic digestion and possible measures for its effective applications: A review. Biotechnology for Biofuels and Bioproduction 15:52. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13068-022-02151-9.

  59. Fagbohungbe, M. O., Herbert, B. M. J., Hurst, L., et al. 2021. The challenges of anaerobic digestion and the role of biochar in optimizing anaerobic digestion. Waste Management 61:236–249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2016.11.028.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Ayantoyinbo, B.B., and Adepoju, O. O. 2018. Analysis of solid waste management logistics and its attendant challenges in Lagos metropolis. Logistics  2(2):11. https://doi.org/10.3390/logistics2020011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Mathias, J. F. C. M. 2014. Manure as a resource: Livestock waste management from anaerobic digestion opportunities and challenges for Brazil. International Food and Agribusiness Management Review 17(4):87–110. https://doi.org/10.22004/ag.econ.188711.

  62. Msibi, S. S., Kornelius, G. 2017. Potential for domestic biogas as household energy supply in South Africa. Journal of Energy in Southern Africa 28(2):1–13. https://doi.org/10.17159/2413-3051/2017/v28i2a1754.

  63. Nevzorova, T., and Kutcherov, V. 2019. Barriers to the wider implementation of biogas as a source of energy: A state-of-the-art review. Energy Strategy Reviews 26:100414. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2019.100414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Scarlat, N., Dallemand, J.F., and Fahl, F. 2018. Biogas: Developments and perspectives in Europe. Renewable Energy 129:457–472. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2018.03.006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Van Nes, W. J. 2016. Asia hits the gas: Biogas from anaerobic digestion rolls out across Asia. Renewable Energy World 1:102–111.

  66. Frix, P. 2017. The main Challenges for Financing Sustainable Energy in Africa: Lessons from the past and new Opportunities for PPP. viewed from an European Point of view. http://www.kaowarsom.be/documents/Energy4Africa/SustainableEnergy4Africa_Frix.pdf

  67. REN21. 2019. Renewable energy policy network for the 21st century renewables 2019: Global Status Report. https://doi.org/10.3390/resources8030139

  68. Stan, F., Gheorghe, A., and Ghenea, A. 2017. State of the art of waste prevention and ‘Urban Wins’ Countries and Municipalities.

  69. Purkus, A., Gawel, E., Szarka, N. et al. 2018. Contributions of flexible power generation from biomass to a secure and cost-effective electricity supply—A review of potentials, incentives and obstacles in Germany. Energy, Sustainability and Society 8:18.

  70. Sebastien, B., and Fabien, N. 2020. The role of a local authority as a stakeholder encouraging the development of biogas: a study on territorial intermediation. Environmental Management 258:110009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.110009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Koop, S. H. A., Koetsier, L., Doornhof, A., et al. 2017. Assessing the governance capacity of cities to address challenges of water, waste, and climate change. Water Resources Management 31:3427–3443. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-017-1677-7.

  72. Aguilarab, M. G., Jaramillo, J. F., Ddiba, D., et al. 2021. Governance challenges and opportunities for implementing resource recovery from organic waste streams in urban areas of Latin America: Insights from Chía, Colombia. Sustainable Production and Consumption 30:53–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2021.11.025.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Agricultural and Biosystems Engineering, Makerere University, P.O. Box 7062, Kampala, Uganda

    Isaac Rubagumya, Allan John Komakech, Isa Kabenge & Nicholas Kiggundu

Authors
  1. Isaac Rubagumya
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Allan John Komakech
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Isa Kabenge
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Nicholas Kiggundu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Isaac Rubagumya.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rubagumya, I., Komakech, A.J., Kabenge, I. et al. Potential of organic waste to energy and bio-fertilizer production in Sub-Saharan Africa: a review. Waste Dispos. Sustain. Energy 5, 259–267 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42768-022-00131-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42768-022-00131-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation