Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Democracy, Constitutionalism, Modernity, Globalisation

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Jus Cogens Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This essay is a contribution to a symposium on Madhav Khosla’s important book, India’s Founding Moment. It uses the book to reflect on the relevance of the story of the Indian founding to constitution making around the world in the twenty-first century. It explores this question through three themes that run through the book: people and process; the substance of constitutions; and global influences. In conclusion, I suggest that the principal value of the Indian example lies in its emphasis on the development of a democratic people through the principles and processes for which a democratic constitution provides. The direct applicability of the Indian example should not be overstated, however. In matters of important detail, it was necessarily anchored in the particularities of the Indian case, including the nature of the societal divisions as they had evolved under colonial rule, attracting substantive constitutional solutions that would not necessarily be applicable elsewhere. The world of constitution making has moved in in 70 years, moreover, as might be expected. Many of the challenges for constitution making now reflect both the possibilities and the pathologies of post-modernity, to which the Indian founding provides at best a general guide.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Khosla 2020.

  2. Khosla 2020, 24.

  3. Khosla 2020, 20, 21.

  4. Khosla 2020, 153–4.

  5. Khosla 2020, 6.

  6. Khosla 2020, 6.

  7. In relation to constitutional development in Thailand, see Uwanno and Burns 2021.

  8. Mirow 2015, 6–7.

  9. Constitution of the Union of Burma 1947.

  10. Coffey 2021, describing the activities of Chan Htoon, legal adviser to the Constituent Assembly of Burma, in India in 1947.

  11. Myint-U T 2019, 30–31.

  12. Rothermund 2006, 10.

  13. Yeh and Chang 2011.

  14. Saunders 2021, 238.

  15. Timor Leste and South Sudan are examples.

  16. Dann, Riegner and Bönnemann 2020.

  17. Daly 2019.

  18. Bell and Zulueta-Fulscher 2016,

  19. Khosla 2020, 4, 21.

  20. Khosla 2020, 25.

  21. This part of the story is told, somewhat briefly, in Khosla 2020, 13–14.

  22. Khosla quotes Gandhi in 1940 on this point: Khosla 2020, 13.

  23. A breakdown of these categories is available at Lok Sabha 2021.

  24. Khosla 2020, 13.

  25. Khosla 2020, 157–158.

  26. A similar approach has been taken, with varying measures of success, in other constitution-making contexts where there is no extant legislature with adequate legitimacy. South Africa and Nepal are good, contrasting, examples.

  27. South African History Online 2019.

  28. Commonwealth Human Rights Initiative 1999.

  29. Hart 2003.

  30. See now, UN Secretary-General 2020.

  31. UN Development Programme 2016.

  32. UN Development Programme 2016, 33.

  33. UN Secretary-General 2020, 4.

  34. Hart 2003, 4.

  35. Saati 2017, 13, 19.

  36. Prempeh 2017, 296, 300.

  37. South Africa also exemplified the significance of this form of leadership: Haysom 2004.

  38. Khosla 2020, 110, 138.

  39. Khosla 2020, 142.

  40. Khosla 2020, 36.

  41. Constitution of Nepal 2015.

  42. Bulmer 2019.

  43. Khosla 2020, 65, 46.

  44. Khosla 2020, 65–69.

  45. See Rao 1967, 147–150.

  46. Coffey 2021.

  47. Khosla 2020, 16.

  48. Dam 2013.

  49. Dam 2013, 154.

  50. Saunders, 2019a, b.

  51. It was elevated to become the second principle in UN Secretary-General 2020, 3.

References

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cheryl Saunders.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Saunders, C. Democracy, Constitutionalism, Modernity, Globalisation. Jus Cogens 4, 11–23 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42439-021-00048-z

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42439-021-00048-z

Keywords

Navigation