Abstract
Tethered quadrotors, unmanned aerial quadrotors connected to a fixed point via tether cables, have been widely applied in numerous aerial tasks. However, their structural parameters and external disturbances give rise to dynamic stability issues, resulting in uncontrolled autonomous flight, shaking, and vibrating. Thus, this article investigates the quantitative stability of a tethered quadrotor using the Lyapunov exponent approach. First, a mathematical model of the tethered quadrotor is developed, and its dynamic stability is quantified to verify the rationality of the designed physical prototype and enhance the aerial system’s stability. Both simulation and experimental results show that the dynamic stability during the landing phase is better than that during takeoff. Finally, optimizing the structural parameters enhances the dynamic stability, which is sensitive to cable length, wind gusts, and yaw angle.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The parameters of the aerial robot we used have been shown in the paper. The data of the simulations and experiments can be provided if necessary.
References
Imanberdiyev N, Kayacan E (2019) A fast learning control strategy for unmanned aerial manipulators[J]. J Intell Rob Syst 94(3):805–824
Niedzielski T, Jurecka M, Miziński B et al (2018) A real-time field experiment on search and rescue operations assisted by unmanned aerial vehicles[J]. Journal of Field Robotics 35(6):906–920
Wang G, Han Y, Li X et al (2020) Field evaluation of spray drift and environmental impact using an agricultural unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) sprayer[J]. Sci Total Environ 737:1–15
Hönig W, Preiss JA, Kumar TKS et al (2018) Trajectory planning for quadrotor swarms[J]. IEEE Trans Rob 34(4):856–869
Nicotra MM, Naldi R, Garone E (2017) Nonlinear control of a tethered UAV: the taut cable case[J]. Automatica 78:174–184
Eskandarpour A, Sharf I (2020) A constrained error-based MPC for path following of quadrotor with stability analysis[J]. Nonlinear Dyn 99(2):899–918
Liu Y, Li X, Wang T et al (2017) Quantitative stability of quadrotor unmanned aerial vehicles[J]. Nonlinear Dyn 87(3):1819–1833
Chen CW (2011) Stability analysis and robustness design of nonlinear systems: an NN-based approach[J]. Appl Soft Comput 11(2):2735–2742
Wolf A, Swift JB, Swinney HL et al (1985) Determining Lyapunov exponents from a time series[J]. Physica D 16(3):285–317
Oseledec VI (1968) A multiplicative ergodic theorem, Lyapunov characteristic numbers for dynamical systems[J]. Trans Moscow Math Soc 19:197–231
Amiri N, Ramirez-Serrano A, Davies RJ (2013) Integral backstepping control of an unconventional dual-fan unmanned aerial vehicle[J]. J Intell Rob Syst 69(1):147–159
Pflimlin JM, Souères P, Hamel T (2007) Position control of a ducted fan VTOL UAV in crosswind[J]. Int J Control 80(5):666–683
Islam S, Liu PX, El Saddik A (2014) Nonlinear adaptive control for quadrotor flying vehicle[J]. Nonlinear Dyn 78(1):117–133
Li X, Ding R, Li J (2020) Quantitative comparison of predictabilities of warm and cold events using the backward nonlinear local Lyapunov Exponent Method[J]. Adv Atmos Sci 37(9):951–958
Dai L, Xia D, Chen C (2019) An algorithm for diagnosing nonlinear characteristics of dynamic systems with the integrated periodicity ratio and lyapunov exponent methods[J]. Commun Nonlinear Sci Numer Simul 73:92–109
Liu Y, Li X, Wang T et al (2017) The stability analysis of quadrotor unmanned aerial vechicles[M]//wearable sensors and robots. Springer, Singapore, pp 383–394
Liu Y, Chen C, Wu H et al (2018) Structural stability analysis and optimization of the quadrotor unmanned aerial vehicles via the concept of Lyapunov exponents[J]. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 94(9):3217–3227
Chen C, Dong T, Fu W et al (2019) On dynamic characteristics and stability analysis of the ducted fan unmanned aerial vehicles[J]. Int J Adv Rob Syst 16(4):1–14
Armiyoon AR, Wu CQ (2016) Lyapunov exponents-based stability analysis and integrated control of rollover mitigation and yaw stabilization of ground vehicles[J]. Int J Veh Syst Model Test 11(4):343–362
Fu JZ, Zang PF, Liu YP et al (2018) Quantitative stability of underwater robot during diving[J]. Comput Simul 35(9):343–348
Dingwell JB, Marin LC (2006) Kinematic variability and local dynamic stability of upper body motions when walking at different speeds[J]. J Biomech 39(3):444–452
Li XY, Zhao B, Yao Y et al (2018) Stability and performance analysis of six-rotor unmanned aerial vehicles in wind disturbance[J]. J Comput Nonlinear Dyn 13(3):1–11
Ding L, Zhou J, Shan W (2018) A hybrid high-performance trajectory tracking controller for unmanned hexrotor with disturbance rejection[J]. Trans Can Soc Mech Eng 42(3):239–251
Ding L, He Q, Wang C et al (2021) Disturbance rejection attitude control for a quadrotor: Theory and experiment[J]. Int J Aerosp Eng 2021:1–15
Antonio-Toledo ME, Sanchez EN, Alanis AY et al (2018) Real-time integral backstepping with sliding mode control for a quadrotor UAV[J]. IFAC-PapersOnLine 51(13):549–554
Ding YD, Wang YY, Chen B (2021) A practical time-delay control scheme for aerial manipulators[J]. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part I 235(3):371–388
Quan Q (2017) Introduction to multicopter design and control[M]. Springer, Singapore
Greco L, Impollonia N, Cuomo M (2014) A procedure for the static analysis of cable structures following elastic catenary theory[J]. Int J Solids Struct 51(7–8):1521–1533
Lyu P, Bao S, Lai J et al (2019) A dynamic model parameter identification method for quadrotors using flight data[J]. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part G 233(6):1990–2002
Arnold L, Doyle MM, Sri NN (1997) Small noise expansion of moment Lyapunov exponents for two-dimensional systems[J]. Dyn Stab Syst 12(3):187–211
Yang C, Wu Q (2010) On stability analysis via Lyapunov exponents calculated from a time series using nonlinear mapping—a case study[J]. Nonlinear Dyn 59(1):239–257
Maus A, Sprott JC (2013) Evaluating Lyapunov exponent spectra with neural networks[J]. Chaos, Solitons Fractals 51:13–21
Jardin MR, Mueller ER (2009) Optimized measurements of unmanned-air-vehicle mass moment of inertia with a bifilar pendulum[J]. J Aircr 46(3):763–775
Ding L, Li Y (2020) Optimal attitude tracking control for an unmanned aerial quadrotor under lumped disturbances[J]. Int J Micro Air Veh 12:1–12
Dong W, Gu GY, Zhu X et al (2014) High-performance trajectory tracking control of a quadrotor with disturbance observer[J]. Sens Actuators, A 211:67–77
Acknowledgements
We thank the anonymous reviewers for their helpful and insightful remarks. In addition, helpful discussions with Professor Xiaofeng Liu from Hohai University on his guidance in aircraft designation are gratefully acknowledged.
Funding
We thank the anonymous reviewers for helpful and insightful remarks. This work was partially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (52005231, 5220505311), Social Development Science and Technology Support Project of Changzhou (CE20215050), and China-Israel Industrial Technology Research Institute Open Fund (JSIITRI202210).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that there are no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Liang, D., Ding, L., Lu, M. et al. Quantitative Stability Analysis of an Unmanned Tethered Quadrotor. Int. J. Aeronaut. Space Sci. 24, 905–918 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42405-023-00574-8
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42405-023-00574-8