Skip to main content
Log in

Quantitative stability of quadrotor unmanned aerial vehicles

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Nonlinear Dynamics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article studies the quantitative stability of quadrotor unmanned aerial vehicles, by analyzing the dynamics model and dynamics stability at the stage of takeoff, landing and yawing, respectively. The dynamics stability problems, such as shaking, losing the tracking accuracy of command and out of control, and the design of structural parameters were investigated in detail. Dynamics stability reflects the dynamics characteristics of the whole systems, which is mainly affected by the structural parameters and control moment. The stability of system can be improved by optimizing structural parameters. The quantitative relationship between structural parameters and dynamics stability is based on the theory of Lyapunov exponent from the designing viewpoint of structural parameter, which aims at improving the reliability and stability of systems. The results indicate that the dynamics stability of systems can be promoted by optimizing the structural parameters of systems, which demonstrates the feasibility and effectiveness of this method.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bai, Y.Q., Liu, H., Shi, Z.Y., et al.: Robust flight control of quadrotor unmanned air vehicles. Robot 34(5), 519–524 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Xu, Y.L.: Crash Source Investigation on the Safety of Take-Off and Landing. Xinhua, Beijing (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Xiao, W.: Research on the Control Technology of Lateral Coupling for Hypersonic Vehicle. Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kumon, M., Katupitiya, J., Mizumoto, I.: Robust attitude control of vectored thrust aeria vehicles. In: 18th IFAC World Congress, Milano, vol. 28, no. 8, pp. 2607–2613 (2011)

  5. Dong, M.M.: Design and Dynamic Analysis of a Helicopter Landing Gear Parameters. Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Zhao, J.: The Dynamic Analysis of a Controllable Underactuated Robot. Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bosworth, J.T., West, J.C.: Real-Time Open-Loop Frequency Response Analysis of Flight Test Data. AIAA 86-9738 (1986)

  8. Gera, J., Bosworth, J.T.: Dynamic Stability and Handling Qualities Tests on a Highly Augmented, Statically Unstable Airplane. NASA TM-88297 (1987)

  9. Pflimlin, J.M., Soueres, P., Hamel, T.: Position control of a ducted fan VTOL UAV in crosswind. Int. J. Control 80(5), 666–683 (2007)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Li, Y.B., Song, S.X.: Hovering control for quadrotor unmanned helicopter based on fuzzy self-tuning PID algorithm. Control Eng. China 20(5), 910–914 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Sun, Y., Wu, Q.: Stability analysis via the concept of Lyapunov exponents: a case study in optimal controlled biped standing. Int. J. Control 85(12), 1952–1966 (2012)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Hong, S.T., Lee, M, Kim, D.M.: Dynamics and control of a single tit-wing UAV. In: 2012 12th International Conference on Control, Automation and Systems (ICCAS). IEEE, pp. 430–432 (2012)

  13. Pflimlin, J.M., Soueres, P., Hamel, T.: Position control of a ducted fan VTOL UAV in crosswind. Int. J. Control 80(5), 666–683 (2007)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Islam, S., Liu, P.X., Saddik, A.: Nonlinear adaptive control for quadrotor flying vehicle. Nonlinear Dyn. 78, 117–133 (2014)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Nguyen, H.D., Vu, H.L., Volker, M.: Robust stability of differential-algebraic equations. Surv. Differ. Algebraic Eq. 2, 63–95 (2013)

  16. Dingwell, J.B., Marin, L.C.: Kinematic variability and local dynamic stability of upper body motions when walking at different speeds. J. Biomech. 39, 444–452 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Yang, C., Wu, Q.: On stabilization of bipedal robots during disturbed standing using the concept of Lyapunov exponents. Robotica 24, 621–624 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Yang, C.X., Wu, Q.: On stability analysis via Lyapunov exponents calculated from a time series using nonlinear mapping—a case study. Nonlinear Dyn. 59, 239–257 (2010)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Yang, C.X., Wu, Q.: A robust method on estimation of Lyapunov exponents from a noisy time series. Nonlinear Dyn. 64(3), 279–292 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. Sun, Y.M., Wu, C.Q.: Stability analysis via the concept of Lyapunov exponents: a case study in optimal controlled biped standing. Int. J. Control 85(12), 1952–1966 (2012)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Abdulwahab, E.N., Atiyah, Q.A., Alzahra, A.T.A.: Aircraft lateral-directional stability in critical cases via Lyapunov exponent criterion. Ai-Khwarizmi Eng. J. 1(9), 29–38 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Ershkov, S.V.: New exact solution of Euler’s equations (rigid body dynamics) in the case of rotation over the fixed point. Arch. Appl. Mech. 84, 385–389 (2014)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Liu, Y., Chen, C., Wu, H., et al.: Structural stability analysis and optimization of the quadrotor unmanned aerial vehicles via the concept of Lyapunov exponents. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 86, 1–11 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Slaughter, S., Hales, R., Hinze, C., Pfeiffer, C.: Quantifying stability using frequency domain data from wireless inertial measurement units. Syst. Cybern. Inform. 10(4), 1–4 (2012)

  25. Wen-Chao, Z., Si-Chao, T., Pu-Zhen, G.: Chaotic forecasting of natural circulation flow instabilities under rolling motion based on Lyapunov exponent. Acta Phys. Sin. 6(9), 605021–605028 (2013)

  26. Ogawa, Y., Venture, G., Ott, C.: Dynamic parameters identification of a humanoid robot using joint torque sensors and/or contact forces. In: 2014 IEEE-RAS International Conference on Humanoid Robots. Madrid, pp. 457–462 (2014)

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the anonymous reviewers for helpful and insightful remarks. Helpful discussions with Professor Wu Qiong from Canada University of Manitoba on his guidance in Lyapunov exponent theory are gratefully acknowledged. This research is supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu province (BK20130999), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51405243, 51575283), Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yunping Liu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liu, Y., Li, X., Wang, T. et al. Quantitative stability of quadrotor unmanned aerial vehicles. Nonlinear Dyn 87, 1819–1833 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-016-3155-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-016-3155-9

Keywords

Navigation