Skip to main content
Log in

Research issues and challenges related to Geo-IoT platform

  • Published:
Spatial Information Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

People have been increasingly interested in the hyper-connected society, where billions of IoT devices and smart phones could be connected to each other and their data could be shared in anywhere and anytime. In the hyper-connected society, Geo-IoT has been attracting much attention as a core technology to realize cyber-physical system which intertwines the real world and the cyber world. Therefore, much research such as data acquisition, storage management, data analysis, visualization, and standardization for Geo-IoT has been actively conducted. In this study, we will present future research directions and challenges by analyzing such the research trends, core issues, and technology levels for various Geo-IoT research areas. As one solution to the future research challenges, we will also present a platform architecture capable of efficiently supporting various types of Geo-IoT applications. The proposed platform consists of a node platform and a server platform, which can support dynamic acquisition, integration, management, and analysis of huge amounts of heterogeneous spatial, location, social and sensor data. In particular, we design the Geo-IoT node platform to enable real-time edge computing support in sensor nodes of mobile environment. Finally, we think our proposed platform architecture will be sufficient to prepare the rapid growth of the recent real-time Geo-IoT service market such as Smart City, CPS, O2O, LBS, AR, CPS, Autonomous Driving, Robot and Drone.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gonzalez-Jaramillo, V. H. (2016). Tutorial: Internet of Things and the upcoming wireless sensor networks related with the use of big data in mapping services; issues of smart cities. In Third international conference on eDemocracy and eGovernment, pp. 5–6.

  2. Kim, M. S., & Lee, C. H. (2012). A middleware system for efficient acquisition and management of heterogeneous Geosensor networks data. Journal of Korea Spatial Information Society, 20(1), 91–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Kim, M. S., & Jang, I. S. (2016). Efficient in-memory processing for huge amounts of heterogeneous geo-sensor data. Spatial Information Research, 24(3), 313–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Chen, N., Wang, X., & Yang, X. (2013). A direct registry service method for sensors and algorithms based on the process model. Computers & Geosciences, 56, 45–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Nagib, A. N., & Hamza, H. S. (2016). SIGHTED: A framework for semantic integration of heterogeneous sensor data on the Internet of Things. Procedia Computer Science, 83, 529–536.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Lee, B. Y. (2015). STTinyDB: Spatio-temporal database system for sensor networks. Konkuk University Master’s Thesis.

  7. Kim, J. J., Yoo, R., Shin, I. S., Kim, S. J., & Han. K. J. (2011). Development of a spatial sensor database system for the USN environment. In Proceeding of the korean society for geospatial information system fall conference, pp. 173–180.

  8. Jin, B., Zhuo, W., Hu, J., Chen, H., & Yang, Y. (2013). Specifying and detecting spatio-temporal events in the internet of things. Decision Support Systems, 55(1), 256–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kim, M. S., Jang, I. S., & Li, K. J. (2013). A study on cost estimation of spatial query processing for multiple spatial query optimization in GeoSensor networks. Journal of Korea Spatial Information Society, 21(2), 23–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ji, M. S., Lee, Y., Kim, K. B., & Bae, H. Y. (2012). A dual processing load shedding to improve the accuracy of aggregate queries on clustering environment of GeoSensor data stream. Journal of the Korea Society of Computer and Information, 17(1), 31–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kim, H., Baek, S. H., Lee, D. W., Kim, K. B., & Bae, H. Y. (2010). Pre-filtering based post-load shedding method for improving spatial queries accuracy in GeoSensor environment. Journal of Korea Spatial Information System Society, 12(1), 18–27.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Baek, S. H., & Kim, K. B. (2015). Spatio-temporal sliding window processing over geosensor data streams. International Journal of Software Engineering and Its Applications, 9(1), 127–142.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Eom, S., Shin, S., & Lee, K. H. (2015). Spatiotemporal query processing for semantic data stream. In IEEE international conference on semantic computing, pp. 290–297.

  14. Ribeiro, A., Vieira, J., Sousa, V., & Cardoso, A. (2015). Demonstration of GIS web-based platform for experimentation supported by geosensors in a WSN. In Experiment@ international conference on experiment, pp. 137–138.

  15. Shi, D., Xu, H., Su, R., & You. Z. (2010). A GEO-related IOT applications platform based on Google Map. In IEEE 7th international conference on e-business engineering, pp. 380–384.

  16. Aceves, E., & Larios, V. M. (2012). Data visualization for georeferenced IoT open data flows for a GDL smart city pilot. In IEEE-GDL CCD smart cities white paper.

  17. Ding, Z., Chen, Z., & Yang, Q. (2014). IoT-SVKSearch: A real-time multimodal search engine mechanism for the internet of things. International Journal of Communication Systems, 27(6), 871–897.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Gray, M. A. (2015). Spheres: A web services framework for smartphone sensing as a service. In International conference on next generation mobile applications, services and technologies, pp. 19–28.

  19. Lv, Z., Yin, T., Zhang, X., Song, H., & Chen, G. (2016). Virtual reality smart city based on WebVRGIS. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 3(6), 1015–1024.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Jie, L., Zhaolong, N., Jedari, B., Feng, X., Lee, I., & Tolba, A. (2016). Geo-social distance-based data dissemination for socially aware networking. IEEE Access: Practical Research, Open Solutions, 4, 1444–1453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Benson, K. E., Qing, H., Kim, K., Phu, N., & Venkatasubramanian, N. (2016). Resilient overlays for iot-based community infrastructure communications. In IEEE first international conference on Internet-of-Things design and implementation, pp. 152–163.

  22. Resner, D., Araujo, G. M., & Frohlich, A. A. (2016). On the impact of dynamic routing metrics on a geographic protocol for WSNs. In Brazilian symposium on computing systems engineering, pp. 109–115.

  23. Baharudin, A. M., & Yan, W. (2016). Long-range wireless sensor networks for geo-location tracking: Design and evaluation. In International electronics symposium, pp. 76–80.

  24. Yoon, M., Kim, Y. K., Bista, R., & Chang, J. W. (2010). A data aggregation scheme based on designated path for efficient energy management of sensor nodes in geosensor networks. Journal of Korea Spatial Information Society, 12(1), 10–17.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Cheng, B., Papageorgiou, A., Cirillo, F., & Kovacs, E. (2015). GeeLytics: Geo-distributed edge analytics for large scale IoT systems based on dynamic topology. In IEEE 2nd world forum on Internet of Things, pp. 565–570.

  26. Saurez, E., Hong, K., Lillethun, D., Ramachandran, U., & Ottenwalder, B. (2016). Incremental deployment and migration of geo-distributed situation awareness applications in the fog. In ACM international conference on distributed and event-based systems, pp. 258–269.

  27. Jeong, M. H., & Duckham, M. (2013). A coordinate-free, decentralized algorithm for monitoring events occurring to peaks in a dynamic scalar field. In IEEE eighth international conference on intelligent sensors, sensor networks and information processing, pp. 437–442.

  28. Thejaswini, M., Rajalakshmi, P., & Desai, U. B. (2015). Novel sampling algorithm for human mobility-based mobile phone sensing. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 2(3), 210–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Argany, M., Mostafavi, M. A., & Karimipour, F. (2010). Voronoi-based approaches for Geosensor networks coverage determination and optimisation: A survey. In International symposium on Voronoi diagrams in science and engineering, pp. 115–123.

  30. Nagarajan, S. G., Zhang, P., & Nevat, I. (2017). Geo-spatial location estimation for Internet of Things (IoT) networks with one-way time-of-arrival via stochastic censoring. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 4(1), 205–214.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Poston, J. D., Schloemann, J., Buehrer, R. M., Sriram, M., Woolard, A. G., & Tarazaga, P. A. (2015). Towards indoor localization of pedestrians via smart building vibration sensing. In International conference on localization and GNSS, pp. 1–6.

  32. Daqiang, Z., Shengjie, Z., Yang, L. T., Min, C., Yunsheng, W., & Huazhong, L. (2015). NextMe: Localization using cellular traces in Internet of Things. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 11(2), 302–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Terroso, S. F., Valdes, Vela. M., & Skarmeta, G. A. F. (2015). Towards human mobility extraction based on social media with complex event processing. In IEEE 2nd world forum on internet of things, pp. 435–440.

  34. Lunsford, P. (2016). Geo-fencing technologies and security. East Carolina University, College of Technology and Computer Science, Department of Technology Systems, William Jason Haddock, ICTN 4040.

  35. Balandina, E., Balandin, S., Koucheryavy, Y., & Mouromtsev, D. (2015). Innovative e-tourism services on top of Geo2Tag LBS platform. In International conference on signal-image technology; internet-based systems, pp. 752–759.

  36. Byon, Y., Young, S. J., Easa, S. M., & Baek, J. (2013). Feasibility analysis of transportation applications based on APIs of social network services. In International conference on information science and technology, pp. 59–64.

  37. Andreini, F., Crisciani, F., & Cicconetti, C. (2011). A scalable architecture for geo-localized service access in smart cities. In Future network and mobile summit, pp. 1–8.

  38. Kim, T., & Hong, S. (2015). Development of GIS based air pollution information system, using a context awareness model. Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society, 16(6), 4228–4236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Kim, K., Jung, S., & Sim, C. (2012). Implementation of user interface and GeoSensor based traveling type sub-observation prototype system for monitoring of groundwate. Journal of the Korea Society of Computer and Information, 17(1), 183–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Liu, Y., Zhang, W., Cui, X., Zhang, G., & Wang, G. (2014). City Pipe network intelligent service based on GIS and Internet of Things. In International conference on intelligent computation technology and automation, pp. 936–939.

  41. Choi, Y., Lee, S. K., & Kim, A. S. (2012). Information retrieval and visualization of social engagement in a city based on social sensor network service. In Conference on journal of the HSI society of Korea, pp. 585–587.

  42. Solanki, V. K., Venkaesan, S., & Katiyar, S. (2017). Conceptual model for smart cities: Irrigation and highway lamps using IoT. International Journal of Interactive Multimedia and Artificial Intelligence, 4(3), 28–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Jung, Y. H., Yang, P. W., Lee, C. W., & Nam, K. W. (2012). Mobile AR system supporting WFS and GeoSensor server. Journal of KIISE, 18(12), 848–858.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Clemens, S. (2015). Applying SWE standards in geo-monitoring. In ISRM regional symposiumEUROCK 2015.

  45. Keng, D., & Koo, S. G. (2014). Spatial standards for Internet of Things. In IEEE international conference on internet of things (iThings), pp. 284–287.

  46. Lee, H., Lee, Y., Jung, W. I., & Bae, H. Y. (2011). Spatial-sensor observation service for spatial operation of geosensor. Journal of the Korea Society of Computer and Information, 16(11), 35–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Koh, J. Y., Nevat, I., Leong, D., & Wong, W. (2016). Geo-spatial location spoofing detection for Internet of Things. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 3(6), 971–978.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Shin, I. S., Kim, S., Kim, J., & Han, K. (2014). Spatio-temporal semantic sensor web based on SSNO. Journal of Korea Spatial Information Society, 22(5), 9–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Calderon, M. A., Delgadillo, S. E., & Garcia-Macias, J. A. (2016). A more human-centric Internet of Things with temporal and spatial context. Journal of Korea Spatial Information Society, Procedia Computer Science, 83, 553–559.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Arkiana, H. R., Diyanatb, A., & Pourkhalili, A. (2017). MIST: Fog-based data analytics scheme with cost-efficient resource provisioning for IoT crowdsensing applications. Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 82(15), 152–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Hong, S. T., Yoon, M., & Chang, J. W. (2010). Implementation of bytecode based data service middleware supporting energy efficiency in geosensor networks. Journal of Korea Spatial Information Society, 18(4), 75–88.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Both, A., & Duckham, M. (2013). Qualitative spatial structure in complex areal objects using location-free, mobile geosensor networks. In IEEE 13th international conference on data mining workshops, pp. 978–985.

  53. Lsikdaga, U., & Piloukb, M. (2016). Integration of geo-sensor feeds and event consumer services for real-time representation of IoT nodes. In International archives of the photogrammetry, remote sensing and spatial information sciences, XLI-B4, pp. 267–274.

  54. Chen, X., Xu, X., Huang, S., Ye, W., Feagan, L., Krishnamoorthy, L., & Ashworth, M. (2015). STaaS: Spatio temporal historian as a service. In IEEE international conference on web services, pp. 747–750.

  55. Keng, D., & Koo, S. G. (2014). Comparing European and American spatial standards for Internet of Things. In IEEE international conference on systems, man and cybernetics, pp. 983–987.

  56. Luan, S., Cai, H., Bu, F., & Jiang, L. (2015). A four-layer flexible spatial data framework towards IoT application. In IEEE 12th international conference on e-business engineering, pp. 339–346.

  57. Madden, S. R., Franklin, M. J., Hellerstein, J. M., & Hong, W. (2005). TinyDB: An acquisitional query processing system for sensor networks. ACM Transactions on Database Systems, 30(1), 122–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by a grant (13 Urban Planning & Architecture 02) from Spatial Information Open Platform Infra Technology Development Research Project funded by Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport government.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Min-Soo Kim.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kim, MS. Research issues and challenges related to Geo-IoT platform. Spat. Inf. Res. 26, 113–126 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41324-017-0161-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41324-017-0161-z

Keywords

Navigation